http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/04/politi...html?hpt=hp_t1
:lmao another retarded bible thumping house wife bites the dust!
Printable View
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/04/politi...html?hpt=hp_t1
:lmao another retarded bible thumping house wife bites the dust!
no surprise there...
sniff sniff
go home and be subservient to that gay-hating hubby.
What a dickhead god was to lead her on like that only to tell to drop out at the last minute.
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by baseline bum
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=188983
She'll be on a book tour in no time.
Or VP pick.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeChalupa
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Why not. Palin was picked last time...Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
You answered your own question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
I imagine WC can't wait to vote for Bachmann
I'm curious to see if she'll run for re-election to Congress.
No fucking way Bachmann is even considered for VP...Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
the tea party is not gonna have its way with the GOP this go around. no chance Bachmann sniffs a VP nod
Almost correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaNuMaNiAc
I can't wait to vote against Obama.
Scary that there are probably many voters like you that feel anyone that the gop rolls with is automatically better than Obama.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Isn't it the truth? That's how I see it. Anybody is better except maybe Gingrich. Gingrich is as unprincipled and unethical, but of a near 180 degrees.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
There's rarely such thing when opinion is involved...Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
The truth is that voters like WC scare me.
....you can also throw angel_luv in that group of voters that scare me
Scare you? Why? There are more of us than you know, and this (anti)progressive politics only does our nation harm.
The people who scare me are the 47%.
How many?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
What percentage of voters stalk people via satellite?
Predetermined voters and staunch partisan hacks scare the shit out of me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
One Wild Cobra is scary enough as is........the thought of multiple WCs is boot shakingly terrifying.Quote:
There are more of us than you know.
.....and nothing of value was lost.
You can call it whatever you want, but I can't see Obama doing anything in the next ten months that would possibly make me change my mind and vote for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
That's the scary part. There are literally millions of people as retarded as you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
this literally made the hair on the back of my neck stand up....Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
There really are a ton of people that don't approve of Obama's job performance and it's got NOTHING to do with the fact that he is black.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
So if Rick Perry somehow comes out of this mess in the primaries on top, you would vote for him over Obama?Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
I don't approve of the job Obama is doing. What scares me is the amount of people who think Rick Santorum would be a better president.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
LolwtfQuote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Just beating you to the punch before you accused me of being a racist for not approving of him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:madrun This is bullshit!! :madrun
:rollin
And I'll say it. If he was white, he would have lost. He was elected for racial reasons as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
:lmao no. He lost because W's approval rating was at like 29% and it was easy to associate McCain with George Bush. It would have taken a miracle for the GOP to win in 2008.
I would probably vote for any "smaller government" candidate over Obama. I'm not worried about their primary pandering to the right, because there is no way they could ever get that moral/social agenda passed. As for the question about Perry...as governor is a scary conservative running in the primary, a moderate in the general election, and pragmatist as governor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ChasingWithBible
Who is that?Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Nothing says "small government" like victims of rape being forced by the government to have a kid
The vote was 52.9% to 45.7%. Blacks turned out in probably double the numbers they normally do and was so close to 100% voting for Obama, it was ridiculously racial.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
I'm pretty sure the outcome would have been different if Obama was white, especially when you include the whites who also wanted to see history made.
Whites who "wanted to see history made" with a black president are people who'd vote democrat anyway.
Please link me a source regarding your conjecture that "double" the amount of black people showed up and voted.
Presidential elections are not won by popular vote. In which states did the increased black vote make the difference for Obama?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
And there were plenty of dumb rednecks out there who normally don't vote but voted in 2008 because the dreaded the reality of a black president. It's retarded to act like being black didn't cost Obama any votes either.
Like I said, they don't have a chance in hell of overturning roe vs.wade and I personally wish they would just shut the fuck up and accept it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
It never ceases to amaze me how people like you assign motives to an entire voting bloc..Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Oh, I think just about any candidate on the republican side is less of a proponent of "more government is the answer" than Obama is.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
I accuse you of being a strawistQuote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Fortunately, I don't really give a fuck what the forums intellectual midgets think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
lolwtfwut....?Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Are you drunk?
What gives you that impression? I mean, Ron Paul I can see... but the rest are as status quo as they come, IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Hmmm...the Lithium doesn't seem to be working like it used to. Come by the office early tomorrow and i'll start you on a generous loading dose of Thorazine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
He pulled it out of his ass... One could just as easily make the claim that hispanics hate blacks and would've turned out en masse to vote against Barry.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
And hispanics (16%) are a bigger portion of the US population than blacks (12%).
I do for entertainment purposes.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Thanks for your entertaining response to my simple question.
Well, the fact that they are universally against the bastardized nationalized health care plan that got passed, for starters...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Probably the same types, but they had more motive to actually vote than in previous elections.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
First of all, I said "probably double" which is cleanly an opinion. I think the facts of complaints of their not being enough voting machines in black neighborhoods is proof enough, since they are allocated by past voting history.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
I laugh at the thought that the GOP represents small government. Starting as many wars as possible and keeping drugs outlawed for no reason isn't exactly small government.
You mean they say they're universally against it. Well, I'm not even sure Romney even fits that criteria, tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Somehow I get the feeling that didn't stop you from re-electing Bush Jr after they passed Medicare Part D...
50% of the black population doesn't have enough numbers to make a 20% swing, which is what you need to win the election.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
So you can (reluctantly) scratch that one off your list.
cowboy playing the "i'm not a racist" race card. lol
So it was mere conjecture and was not based off any facts or data.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Glad we cleared that up.
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra's Surgeon
Rofl because he played it before anyone else sat down at the table to playQuote:
Originally Posted by clambake
Quote:
Originally Posted by clambake
I propose a few forum members make it part of their respective sigs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Bingo. For her to get out so soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
lol the Bachmann lovers delusional enough to think any sane candidate would pick that wacko cunt as the VP
your shitty bible thumping house wife is about to be as irrelevant as your previous bible thumping house wife is now
Go for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I defy you to ever find a racist quote from me...
It would be like searching for a needle in a strawstack.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
The big problem is that your average republican these days preach "down with socialism! (but save medicare, social security, etc)".
Basically, they want the socialism, they just don't want it called that.
Or thinking that we should be telling people who they can marry.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Or wanting to ban pornography(Santorum).
The guy's aversion to human sexuality is downright creepy. I give it 6 months till he's caught blowing some dude at a rest stop.
There was only a 7.2% difference in the popular vote. A 3.6% swing would be an effective tie.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
No...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
I see a distinct difference between caring for our elderly and handicapped vs. welfare for able bodied people.
Correct. I see your comprehension of the English language is starting to improve.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
I think regardless of if she was convinced, or if she came to the decision herself, she decided that America didn't need another McCain candidate where the conservative vote was split with Huckster and Mitt.
That's as good a sig as any.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Popular vote doesn't win elections. Heck, we already had a president that lost the popular vote and won the election.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Back to the drawing board for you.
It's still welfare, whatever color you want to paint it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
So?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Do you understand the difference or not?
Quite frankly the amount of tax payer money this country uses to keep people in their 80s alive at the expense of education for people 20 years and younger who actually have something to contribute to society is appalling.
it wouldn't be that bad if our healthcare system wasn't completely fuckedQuote:
Originally Posted by DoK
What's your solution youngster?Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
let useless old people dieQuote:
Originally Posted by Agloco
Bachmann claims she is not a politician
“I am a very real person, I am not a politician,” she said during a speech to her supporters. “Nor do I ever hope or aspire to be a politician.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/0...-a-politician/
Will you feel that way in your later years? Have you told your grandparents that?Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Watching someone who incessantly whines about welfare and big government continuously argue that tax dollars should go towards healthcare of people who were irresponsible and didn't save up enough to take care of themselves if really hilarious tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
But to answer your question, I plan on proper diet and exercise most of my life, along with saving up a lot of money before I retire. If my health deteriorates to a certain point I'd much rather die then live out the rest of my days miserably.
Almost all senior citizens 75 years or older (especially ones in nursing homes) are on some kind of anti-depressant, be it Lexapro, Effexor, Celexa, or something else. They realize they've become nothing more than piss and shit factories and really dont want to be alive anyways
:rollin
Apparently you only see things in black and white. Maybe you should think about the differences, and how I have already explained what I feel are valid exceptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Besides the shades of gray, maybe you should upgrade to color as well. Nice HD TV's are coming down in price you know.
What about the handicapped? Just let them die? What about the elderly who did plan, but already liquidated their assets as required for some benefits? Shouldn't we at least allow for a more comfortable living or our seniors last years with us?Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Now i would draw the line at expensive life extending procedures and drugs. This is for people who can afford them. Not for the tax payers to pay. Still, easing a person's transition into the next realm I think is the proper thing to do.
[QUOTE=DoK]
That's why we have living wills. Oregon has assisted suicide. This gets complicated here though. My personal view is different than others, but shouldn't we consider the person's wishes? Some people are afraid to die, and takes a long time for them to accept it. Some never do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Magua
Great counter argument. As ElNono said, welfare is welfare, and socialism is socialism. Medicare is a form of both welfare and socialism. You support welfare and socialism in a way by supporting medicare.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Going by Republican logic where you always blame the victim, it's their fault they didn't have more assets to liquidate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
If easing a person's transition is this issue, give them a nice, civilized assisted suicide when their healthcare gets too expensive. Some old cunt who's been smoking 2 packs a day her entire life and needs lung cancer treatment shouldn't be the taxpayer's responsibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Something that pisses me off is seeing someone get a heart, liver, or lung transplant that are abusing themselves with drugs of some sort, when others who take care of themselves need them too. Isn't the better candidate the one who will likely not destroy the new ones like they did the ones that they originally had?
There are few absolutes in life. Only an idiot only sees one extreme or another without seeing the vast area between, or allow merit based exceptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Thank you... lol don't want to call it socialism when I agree with itQuote:
Originally Posted by DoK
There's nothing extreme. Medicare is a form of socialism. Do you think medicare isn't a form of socialism?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
It's ok to simply state "I like socialism in certain areas"... nobody is going to jump at you or ask you to return your GOP member cardQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
That's why I support a universal healthcare system that's literally done on a case by case basis. Self inflicted health problems should mean they're on their own, health problems they couldn't avoid should be covered. Age itself though should not be grounds for complete government healthcare coverage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
I never said it wasn't a form now, did I?Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
Just because I primarily take conservative and libertarian stances, doesn't mean i don't disagree with everything outside those defined bounds.
Bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
you do it very often.
when have you ever said you like socialism in certain areas?