-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
"It's the healthy fuckers that just won't die that are the REAL problem"
no, it's the 150M Americans inflicting themselves with lifestyle diseases of hi BP, CVD, diabetes, stroke, smoking (400K smoking deaths/year), dementia, osteoarthritis, etc.
they're eating shitty corporate food-like substances and no exercise, mental or physical.
Also, BigPharma has hypnotized everybody into thinking that taking their shitty, dangerous drugs is necessary, bringing happiness, hard dicks, and giving health, just a swallow away (for the rest of your life).
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
If we have to choose between policing the entire world and taking care of our own people, i'm going with taking care of our own 10 times out of 10. no reason why we should spend almost a trillion per year on defense budget then bitch that we can't take care of our sick. government is too big and out of control, and government spending is never efficient spending. the government knows it will always get its revenue (taxes) and can't fail like a business, so therefore they aren't thrifty with their money. So much money gets wasted it's mind boggling.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Oh.... My.... God....
Everyone, mark this day...
I agree with boutons.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boutons_deux
"It's the healthy fuckers that just won't die that are the REAL problem"
no, it's the 150M Americans inflicting themselves with lifestyle diseases of hi BP, CVD, diabetes, stroke, smoking (400K smoking deaths/year), dementia, osteoarthritis, etc.
they're eating shitty corporate food-like substances and no exercise, mental or physical.
Also, BigPharma has hypnotized everybody into thinking that taking their shitty, dangerous drugs is necessary, bringing happiness, hard dicks, and giving health, just a swallow away (for the rest of your life).
well yeah you're pretty much right here, natural news says that prescription drugs kill 16,400 times more people annually than terrorists do. they give you something that only causes something else to go wrong then you need another medicine for that and so on. hell, it's funny you mention hard dicks, it's no coincidence that were the only country outside the middle east who circumcises and then all our dicks won't get hard after 40. we spend way more on viagra than other countries, just another example of being scammed. then the foreskins are turned into a several hundred billion a year industry as they are used in pharmaceutical industry and cosmetics. we're being scammed by big pharma big time.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cheguevara
How can something that does not exists be sitting anywhere?
Accounting. The spreadsheet that holds the number is sitting there.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
Give hem a break. He's addicted to Hope-ium.
lol cheerleader pointing fingers
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Accounting. The spreadsheet that holds the number is sitting there.
what spreadsheet?
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cheguevara
what spreadsheet?
The one that says how many US dollars are on China's account at the Fed.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
so it's not US dollars sitting in the Fed.
Ok thanks :tu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
The US debt is in US Dollars. All of it.
What we owe China? Sitting in the Fed in US Dollars.
What we owe France? Sitting in the Fed in US Dollars.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cheguevara
so it's not US dollars sitting in the Fed.
Ok thanks :tu
You're correct. :tu
It's denominated in US Dollars. And it's only convertible to US goods and services.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
And it's only convertible to US goods and services.
i dont think so. i think technically you can withdraw your money like at any other bank...
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
You're correct. :tu
It's denominated in US Dollars. And it's only convertible to US goods and services.
I wonder what would happen if we placed an expiration date on debt. Convert the debt obligation, or lose it...
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
The US debt is in US Dollars. All of it.
What we owe China? Sitting in the Fed in US Dollars.
What we owe France? Sitting in the Fed in US Dollars.
Well, technically it's not sitting there yet.
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/wp-c...ting-money.jpg
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Truth is we are living on borrowed money. An unsustainable path to economic doom.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CosmicCowboy
And likely never will be. AFAIK, it's not redeemable directly from the Fed.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mavs>spurs
i dont think so. i think technically you can withdraw your money like at any other bank...
I don't think so. I think part of the deal is that you cannot.
Obviously, you can use the money to purchase goods then resell them.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
I don't think so. I think part of the deal is that you cannot.
Obviously, you can use the money to purchase goods then resell them.
:lmao
fucking clueless...
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
I don't think so. I think part of the deal is that you cannot.
Obviously, you can use the money to purchase goods then resell them.
:lol what "deal" are you talking about?
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
:lmao nothing is stopping China from dumping US securities. That is why we cannot really enact any protectionist measures against them or even intervene in the Taiwan-China relations.
:lol ElNono read some more. you got homework tonight :lmao
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Debt with China is not even the issue
Quote:
We have already seen that when the United States runs a current account deficit, there must be net capital inflows (i.e., a capital account, or more precisely financial account, surplus) to fund the gap between domestic savings and investment. The United States needs to increase private domestic saving and cut the size of the budget deficit, preferably by slowing the growth of government spending rather than increasing taxes. Cutting marginal tax rates on saving and investment, meanwhile, would help promote U.S. growth. Downsizing government and tax reform would reduce the growth of U.S. public debt relative to GDP, and increase the standard of living for future consumers.
Limited government, strong private property rights, and open markets were the hallmarks of the U.S. economy during the first wave of globalization in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Economic growth was strong and the United States ran persistent trade deficits financed by foreign investment and borrowed from foreigners for private investment—not to fund government deficits. Limiting government growth would help strengthen property rights, and adhering to free trade in goods and capital would encourage foreign investment in the U.S. private sector.
Running a trade deficit under those conditions would not be a problem.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/articles/dorn_bjwa_142.pdf
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Cato, VRWC funded stink tank.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cheguevara
:lmao nothing is stopping China from dumping US securities
Yes there is, us being the biggest buyer of all their crap being why. China destroying the US economy would be just as destructive to their own economy.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Well, it doesn't benefit China to dump right now but they are damn sure considering their options. We are too deep into them and their position is too big. They would just screw themselves. They ARE making new buys for shorter terms and letting their longer positions age out. When they are ready, they will move. One day we will have a treasury auction and nobody will buy and we will be well and truly fucked.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
BTW, they are dumping HUGE amounts of money into South America and commodities in general as they diversify. We AREN'T the only game in town.
-
Re: Paul: We dont have a revenue problem, we have spending problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CosmicCowboy
:lmao
fucking clueless...
:lmao
fucking clueless...
this is too easy