That '04 team had Hedo, who was probably the closest Spur we've had to RJ. That team couldn't shoot at all. This Spurs team can shoot pretty well, as you've no doubt noticed.
Printable View
That '04 team had Hedo, who was probably the closest Spur we've had to RJ. That team couldn't shoot at all. This Spurs team can shoot pretty well, as you've no doubt noticed.
Meh. Who cares about history?
Hedo made 8 out of 28 (28% ) from downtown that series.......Quote:
Originally Posted by roycrikside
I like our shooters better
Quote:
Originally Posted by smaka
Obviously Hitler for one.
:p:
History majors.Quote:
Originally Posted by smaka
Del Negro was the closest Spur we had to RJ tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by roycrikside
Obviously the 2004 demise is in the back of the minds of the Big 3 and Pop. I'm sure Pop has mentioned how win streaks don't guarantee anything about 234,112,644 times this season.
This Spurs team may eventually implode but it's much more likely to be a defensive meltdown than an offensive meltdown. That 2004 Spurs team was statistically the best defensive team in NBA history. However, offensively they were below average. That below average offense eventually caught up to them . . .
As long as the timekeeper is sober we will be fine.
timvp, why do you have pic of Manu and TP in your posts and not TD??? I mean, look at your name, for chrissakes. Are you figuring that Timmy is old now so not worthy of being in your picture?
:depressed
Manu's old too dude. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimcs50
people always say pack the paint blahblahblah like that hurts the spurs
it hurts parkers scoring game but if you pack the paint that means that shooters will be open
we have the best shooters in the league
we want teams to pack the paint
thats how our offense works
then if they decide theyre getting burned to much they stop packing the paint and parker goes into layup drill mode
Tony Parker can shoot jumpshots now.
That is the reason we didn't win that series...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimcs50
So, here we are again....17 straight wins.....game in LA.....can it happen?
Nah.
:p:
I think the reason was that nobody could hit a damn jumpshot that series, not TP, not Malik, and not He"don't." We would have won if we had kept Jax.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec24Row7
We also had Horry who couldn't make a shot against his former team.
This is worthy of a bump, given the circumstances.
I was afraid that the longer the winning streak got, so would the losing streak that would inevitably follow (law of averages). That's why I was halfway "hoping" for a loss or two in earlier rounds, just so this winning streak would not end up working against the Spurs (mathematically speaking).Quote:
Originally Posted by Keepin' it real
Sadly, the Spurs are halfway toward a 4-game losing streak, which would put their playoff win percentage at 71%, which would be very close to their 75% winning percentage in the regular season.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keepin' it real
As I said, these things have a way of evening out. Let's hope the Spurs can overcome the mathematical challenge facing them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keepin' it real
:flag:
What about history repeating itself from '03 against the Lakers (W-W-L-L-W-W)? Or the Sonics in '05 (W-W-L-L-W-W)? Those were easily the toughest WC teams the Spurs played in each of those championship runs.
2003 and 2005 Duncan would laugh at this version...Quote:
Originally Posted by gameFACE
I'm thinking having game 5 at home is what will swing the momentum back to the guys in silver and black.Quote:
Originally Posted by gameFACE
Can it yes? Will it no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimcs50
Damn, it looks like history is repeating itself, only one series later. 20 game win streak instead of 17 game win streak, 2-0 lead, and possibly lose 4 straight again.
Don't think that in back of my mind, when Spurs had shot to tie game( down 3), with TD having ball in 3 pt area, that I thought of him launching the 3, making it, then having Westbrook hitting game winner at buzzer.....that would have been too freaky.
I am hoping SA can somehow pull out a game 6 victory, because this team does not deserve the ignominy of losing 4 straight and getting bounced out of playoffs. I'd much rather they lose in game 7.
Man Pop should have lost a game sooner.
I commented about this worry when we were up 2-0. Everything, especially the winstreak and how unstoppable Parker looked on screen and rolls, was way, way too similar not to be concerned.
It all came to head on that last jumpshot from Tony last night. I was visibly sickened and disheartened when Parker hesitated and looked wildly around for a defender, even though his defender was seconds behind the play and everyone else was staying home, daring him to shoot a simple 17 footer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by z0sa
Yeah, we had a chances numerous times to hit go ahead shots or shots to tie game. That shot by Manu looked like he made it to me, it was sickening seeing it miss and them get rebound.