SJax trade

I agree SJax needs to retire a Spur; the prodigal son comes home.

This is illogically ridiculous.

If you're clearing cap space to sign Diaw/Lorbek - then you're gunning for the short term (as we should be). If you're gunning for the short term, you don't have FOUR rookies + Joseph taking up 1/3 of your roster slots.

Unless there is some once-in-a-lifetime trade opportunity. Hell no

Never say never, but I highly doubt the Spurs went to such lengths to bring back Jack only to get rid of him the following season.

The Spurs core should be built around Duncan, Parker and Leonard. Anyone else is on the trade block if the Spurs could add younger more athletic bigger players.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SenorSpur

Unless there is some once-in-a-lifetime trade opportunity. Hell no

Never say never, but I highly doubt the Spurs went to such lengths to bring back Jack only to get rid of him the following season.

---

SJax's 10mil expiring contract is a valuable trade chip. It would be stupid for the Spurs to not explore all the possibilities.

Roster next year should be:

PG: Beno
SG: Green (the chocking version)
SF: RJ
BF: Bonner
C: Varejao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpurOutofTownFan

Roster next year should be:

PG: Beno
SG: Green (the chocking version)
SF: RJ
BF: Bonner
C: Varejao

---

Now that's what i call a championship lineup. :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperManu!!!

Fuck yo trade idea clown

---

:makemyday

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T Park

You only trade Jackson for two reasons.

1, you can get a bonafied legit big man to put next to Duncan.

2 somehow hes packaged to move up in the draft to get a said bigman.

Other than that, I see zero reason to trade Stephen Jackson.

He's a player that excels in his later years due to his game of perimeter shooting, occasional drives to the basket, and good solid defense.

---

This. Plus it would be great for him to retire as a Spur.