http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_sQsntc3Xw
D's up bosh and the current nba champs and drops 27
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_sQsntc3Xw
D's up bosh and the current nba champs and drops 27
129 players 7' or taller have played at least 100 games in NBA history.
Andrea ranks 126th out of 129 in total rebounding percentage. His career rebounding percentage is 9.6 compared to 10.9 for Bonner. #1 pick in the draft, 7' feet tall, and doesn't rebound as well as Matt Bonner.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...der_by=trb_pct
he had bosh on his team, hard to get rebounds when bosh is taking them allQuote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
Check #7 of the FAQ stickied at the top of the forum for instructions.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
and hes 4th on that list for scoring....you put him next to duncan and he will be 1000000x better than bonner
Sorry, but lame.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
He's at 9.6 for his career. 8.6 and 9.8 in the two years without Bosh. He's among the very, very worst rebounding 7 footers in NBA history. That's just a fact.
hes 9th in total rebounds.....
Btw, if you're trying to make a case for a former #1 overall pick by saying that he's better than Matt Bonner, you've already lost the debate.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
and you choose the one stat that is guessed and doesnt mean shit...he gets 5.5 rbs a game...not that bad, hes a dirk type player
Among the bottom 29 in rebounding percentage... not exactly something to hang your hat on.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
an estimated rebounding percentage....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
the people who voted against getting bargnani are crazy, he is a young #1 pick who can drop 25 points easily, and would play bonners role drastically better than bonner and then some
Last year. 4.9 for his career. That's horrific for a 7 footer. Dirk is at 8.3 for his career.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
The same method was used to calculate every player's percentage. Are you saying that the method is unfairly biased against Andrea?
Again, being a better Bonner is an awfully low bar for a former #1 pick.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
no, im saying its a stupid stat...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
4.9 for the years with bosh...now that hes out of bosh's shadow he is raising his rebounds per game. next year i bet he will average 6-7 rbs a gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
Ok, we'll use rebounds/36 minutes. 131st out of 133. Face it, no matter how you slice it Andrea is among the very worst rebounding 7 footers in NBA history.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
http://www.basketball-reference.com/..._by=trb_per_mp
only 32 spots under dirk, not too bad for the start of a long and hall of fame ending careerQuote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
No, 4.9 for his entire career.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
He was at 6.2 his last season with Bosh. 5.2 and 5.5 in the two seasons without him. Plus his rebounds per minutes are down and his rebounding percentage is down.
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani
Ok, you win. 131st out of 133 isn't too bad.
he is a top 10 shot blocking 7 footers in NBA history according to that siteQuote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
top 8 7 footer in NBA history in steals
#1 FT%, def something the spurs need
No, he's not. When you click the Blocks column at the top of the page on which he's listed, it only ranks him against the other 32 worst rebounders.Quote:
Originally Posted by mabrignani