RON PAUL>>> WHOO HOOO!!!! :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by SA210
Printable View
RON PAUL>>> WHOO HOOO!!!! :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by SA210
Strong defense of team blueQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Actually I recall Perry's saying much the same thing as Stewart.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
I know, you prefer Obama's treatment for 5 year olds a lot better. :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Hey, let the Catholic church help those Pakistanis.
More of an indictment of team red.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
Have you figured out the difference between legal and moral yet?
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
now that's some weak sauce shit.
Have you ever voted?Quote:
increases beaurocracy and increasing goverment size
They already have volunteer poll watchers. No need to increase anything.
You didn't answer the question.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
That's some weak sauce shit.
Chump fails AGAIN.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
No additional bureaucracy needed because we already have poll watchers.
CC fails AGAIN.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
How much of that fraud is covered by existing laws, and how much will be prevented by the proposed voter ID law?
You idiot.
Actually it's an indictment of both teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Yah, I know all about that difference. Have you figured out who's responsible for appointing the AG, jackboot?
Oh, I just ignored that shit. We have been over and over this same ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
You and RG will just vomit out blue team talking points that there is no voter fraud and Republicans just want to disenfranchise the poor ignorant vunnerables.
I will say that we don't have any idea how much voter fraud we have because we have never checked for it. No checking = no valid data for either side to use.
It just devolves into a pointless waste of time.
Sorry, there are already checks, genius. Stay out of the conversation if you just want to remain an ignorant bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
What checks are there that the person voting is who they say they are?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
*crickets*
lol trying to change the subject like the bitch you are.
You're back to proving that voter impersonation actually happens.
Which you can't.
And never could.
And would be the only reason for voter ID laws.
Therefore, you have no reason for voter ID laws.
QED.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
I think Chump refuses to admit he likes voting at as many polling places as he can make it to in one day.
*crickets*
WC likes to lie at every opportunity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Tell me how your fantasy would work out practically.
Thanks in advance.
None. God blessQuote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Who ever went through the trouble of impersonating a voter?Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
Think about how that is supposed to play out, geniuses.
lol think
You god can't even help you with that.
Ron bless.
DuhQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
There is no data to prove it one way or the other because we don't check.
Keep vomiting blue team talking points Chump.
Brother, I would think people who are not eligible to vote. Approx 12 million illegals live in the USA and I'm sure a lot of them make it down to the polls on election day to vote. Nothing to stop them. Its easier to vote than it is to get here. Lots of hostility in your post, brother. God blessQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Duh, indeed.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy
Actually there have been a couple of voter impersonation convictions in the past couple of decades. If nothing was checked, how could they have happened, genius?
Keep vomiting up your ignorance, idiot.
I think you have never actually voted. Lots of stupidity in your post, sister. Ron bless.Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
lol "I would think"
lol "I'm sure"