Ron Paul 2016, sons!

Yeah, I don't get it but you do whatever makes you happy. Vote for Obamney.

Again, you can shit on Ron Paul and his supporters but the man is a walking encyclopedia. He could be a history teacher with amount of shit that he knows.

Anyways, this is pointless. You like Obamney so that's that. Good luck with it.

You don't get it because you don't know the facts :lol

:lol a walking history book who doesn't know shit about the founding fathers

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...11533103_n.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SA210

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...11533103_n.jpg

---

:lol Cry baby loser paulbots.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cJjqRt7kFx...ur-a-loser.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

:lol Cry baby loser paulbots.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cJjqRt7kFx...ur-a-loser.jpg

---

I wouldn't call it crying, but voicing that changing the rules in the middle of the game is flat out unethical.

Do you condone such practices?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jacob1983

Ron Paul would hammer Obama on the Patriot Act, the NDAA, expanding the war in Afghanistan, drone attacks, and Gitmo. It would be fuckin' priceless. It's a shame that so many people are blind sheep in America.

---

agree and i've even thought obama & his supporters rigged the republican presidential primaries and purposefully made a mormon the presidential candidate who would never have a chance to beat obama

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

I wouldn't call it crying, but voicing that changing the rules in the middle of the game is flat out unethical.

Do you condone such practices?

---

rules are REGULATIONS.

Repugs are flat out, relentlessly against ALL regulations, wanting to be trusted to Do The Right Thing.

And when the Repugs flaunt the rules and YOUR man is screwed, you still don't support rules and regulations, you TRUST the Repugs anyway.

Politics is down there in nastiness with untreated, untreatable venereal disease.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

rules are REGULATIONS.

Repugs are flat out, relentlessly against ALL regulations, wanting to be trusted to Do The Right Thing.

And when the Repugs flaunt the rules and YOUR man is screwed, you still don't support rules and regulations, you TRUST the Repugs anyway.

Politics is down there in nastiness with untreated, untreatable venereal disease.

---

What about the demonrats proclamation of Jerusalem against their delegates wishes? They are both for themselves first and against the people. Why do you only pick on repugs?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin

---

:tu

As long as the Libertarian Party is filled with tin-foil hatters who come up with a new government conspiracy every other day it'll never be taken seriously. If people like Alex Jones want Ron Paul to be president, the best thing they can do would be to stop giving him so much public support.

I have a family member who lets just say is a pretty big leader in the Libertarian movement and his/her friends are the most batshit people I've ever met in my life.

Ron Paul will be 81 years old in 2016. Apparently Paulbots think he's the Lubavitcher Rebbe and will live eternally.

I laughed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Homeland Security

Ron Paul will be 81 years old in 2016. Apparently Paulbots think he's the Lubavitcher Rebbe and will live eternally.

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

What about the demonrats proclamation of Jerusalem against their delegates wishes? They are both for themselves first and against the people. Why do you only pick on repugs?

---

yup, notice how it's crickets in that thread.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202992

you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. we already had a thread on that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sa210

yup, notice how it's crickets in that thread.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202992

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by winehole23

you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. We already had a thread on that.

---

pwned!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. we already had a thread on that.

---

Nah, not on this particular comparison and news story. And you miss the point anyhow, It's about how BOTH sides are ok with clear and open corruption/election fraud and too afraid to admit it for fear of admitting to themselves that they are brainwashed and ignorantly argue over red/blue rather than truth. lol

Nice try though. :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SA210

Nah, not on this particular comparison and news story. And you miss the point anyhow, It's about how BOTH sides are ok with corruption. lol

Nice try though. :tu

---

It's already been noted and demonstrated without your help.

Nice fail, though. The whining helped. :tu

Rand 2016!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Edward

Except for the Ron Paul supporters who think the Constitution was written by anti-Federalists who want small government (which means most Ron Paul supporters).

---

I'd suggest that you read Article I Section 8, Article II Section 2, and Article III Section 2 in the Constitution, B.... that clearly lists all the powers given to each branch of government, and nowhere does it give a blank check to any branch for inflating the size and scope of the government....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin

---

Translation: :cry "I don't like Ron Paul because he won't lie to me and promise me more Baby Boomer handouts!" :cry

By the way, Paul disavows the 9/11 truther nonsense, tbh, as do plenty of Ron Paul supporters....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Galileo

Rand 2016!

---

I would support Rand if/when he runs. He would have a real shot at getting the nomination. Don't think he has the personality to win in the general though.

Rand is a total and complete sellout, Paul Ryan 2.0 tbh... if you want a faux-libertarian neocon who supports drones and sanctions, by all means, vote Rand if he runs... if you want liberty, Rand is NOT your guy....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

Rand is a total and complete sellout, Paul Ryan 2.0 tbh... if you want a faux-libertarian neocon who supports drones and sanctions, by all means, vote Rand if he runs... if you want liberty, Rand is NOT your guy....

---

:lol In other words, real libertarians only support completely bat shit crazy candidates.

Again, you can shit on Ron Paul and his supporters but at least the man stands for something and actually seems sincere and wants to do good for people. That's rare in politics. Is Ron Paul perfect? No. Does he have all the answers? No. Could he solve every problem in America? No. With that being said, Ron Paul is one of the most consistent sincere politicians in America. That has to count for something.

And Romney supporters can laugh all they want but they will be the ones crying on election day when the majority of Ron Paul supporters vote for 3rd party candidates and basically give Obama a 4th term of Bush. :lol