some vaccines have worked very well, other vaccines are nothing but money-spinning marketing scams.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Printable View
some vaccines have worked very well, other vaccines are nothing but money-spinning marketing scams.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
There is a difference between vaccine manufacturers sitting on the UN-WHO panel and pushing for more vaccines in Africa and "any idea whatsoever how corrupt and evil the FDA actually is and how many deaths they are responsible for year in and year out with their lies, corruption and brainwashing?"Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
The FDA does indeed get pressured by pharmaceuticals and puch meds out without enough testing. OTOH, if they had not been holding anything back at all which would be the bigger problem.
There is a difference between not protecting us enough and hurting us. Paulites remind me of Christian in their latching onto dogma.
You seem to be very misinformed about how they suppress cures and information which leads to millions of deaths. They got at least 4 or 5 Grand Jury's to try to stop this doctor from his PROVEN cancer cure for many patients. Then when they couldn't stop him by so many grand jury's, they pretended to run studies on the doctors work by purposely omitting certain ingredients in his cure during trials, then claimed his cure didn't work. This is fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Your dismissal of this corruption reminds me of the typical blind red/blue team supporters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qG_ZWs04es
BigPharma does nearly all the testing of their stuff, with too small samples, and for about 90 days, AND they suppress negative results, and pimp positive results. It's totally corrupt without any effective oversight, since so many of the FDA mucky mucks actually worked for and will be going back to BigPharma. This is pretty much S.O.P:Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
http://rense.com/general33/fd.htm
briefly, the FDA and BigPharma are effectivitly indistinguishable.
And if any FDA researchers, scientist express differently, ie, blow whistles, from the FDA/BigPharma, FDA snoops their communications, and will fire them. The absence of FDA integrity, its corruption, is safely assumed to be total.
BigPharma corps have been fined nearly $20B over the last 20 years or so for killing/maiming people. Fines are written off as a business expense, and I suppose fully tax deductible as a loss.
Same story with Fed + Treasury + SEC, as TARP, etc QE proved beyond any doubt.
The complete capture of regulatory/legislative apparatus by corporations is irrecoverable. And Gecko says he will even kill the weak EPA, financial, etc regulations if elected.
You act as if this hasn't been hashed out before.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
Scientific method: learn about it.
And for all of your claims that I sound partisan how about you point to particular behavior. i want substantiated proof and not uncorroborated or non-repeatable claims by a random individual. If by proven, you mean failed clinical trials then you have a point.
You on the other hand pull the Cosmored/WC schtick of repeating the same tired shit and ignoring rebuttals only to repeat the same thing a month later. Willing something to be true works no better.
:lol That link has a big title claiming that the free masons don't want you to see it.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Seriosuly guys. You need to rethink how you come to conclusions.
BigPharma profits and BigPharma/FDA careers trump "scientific method" and the public's health.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
Seriously, dude, you're fucking fool if trust the FDA, or any regulatory agency, or any politician, to value citizens and the country above the 1% and corporate profits.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
No, the problem is I post a lot of truths, and morons dismiss it right away without even knowing anything about it. Ya'll immediately rush to believe what Big Pharma, corrupt doctors and FDA say about vaccines, meds, cures, etc. The whole while not understanding that they suppress so much info such as case of Dr. Burzynski. I post again because the truth is the truth and I don't give a shit about the morons who are purposely clueless on it. The quick ignorant response is always "tin foil hat", or references to cosmored, etc, because you and others truly have no real argument against how you and so many people have been fooled by government. It's funny how ya'll can't actually do some real research on what I talk about, instead yall would rather try finding only fraudulent hit pieces trying to disprove them, or disregard it because people don't want to watch a "youtube" lol, but many will spend hours arguing senseless bullshit, but no can't watch that youtube and learn something. All the while no real conversation happens, the ignorant mind would rather stay ignorant, the majority ignorant viewpoints would always agree with you anyway so there is no risk involved going with the norm, I get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
You're repeating yourself. I not only called you behaving like Cosmo but explained why. Burzinski was given his clinical trials and failed. He took it to court and a jury of his peers ruled against him. this has already been hashed out before yet you repeat yourself again.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
That is exactly what cosmored/WC does. You don't move the argument forward. You just try to start it over after you've lost. There is a reason why you get the tin-foil hat treatment. In this case, not only is the FDA in on it but some random group of jurors. You want to believe what you want to believe rather than what you have reason to believe so you jsut repeat the same shit.
:lol I haven't lost shit, you only think I did.. I already explained to you that they ran fake trials by PURPOSELY leaving out a key ingredient in the cure so that they could say that it didn't work. You obviously don't know what really happened. Again, while I repeat the truth you repeat sheeple common assumptions based on what the lying FDA tells you. Keep repeating the same shit, you're wrong every time.
So just to be clear. The FDA, US attorney's office, and the jury were all in on this and in the case of the first two remain in on it. Oh since it was a fake trial, the Federal Court system is in on it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
Might as well throw in the AMA and the pharmaceutical lobby while we're at it. Is this accurate?
And as for your sheeple assertion. A justice on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals is a family friend and I find your assertion to be unfounded and without honor.
Yea, that 5th circuit court of Appeals is trash. They also ruled against stopping a demolition of an historic public housing project because of politics, even though it was historical. I know about this first hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
On the FDA, yes they went after the Dr over and over again and with at least 4 or 5 Grand Jury's and could not do shit to him. Then they ran trials by leaving out a key effective ingredient from it (funny how you ignore this), they knew this and then turned around and claimed it didn't work (after knowingly leaving out the ingredient that makes it work). Yes it was a scam, hell you obviously believed it. Just like the 5th Circuit of appeals believed HUD when they said the projects had no historical significance. Since the Feds said it, it must be true. Fuck the honor bs. I find your assertions completely and sadly wrong.
So you don't deny it. The total of the FDA, the justice department, the jury, the federal courts, and various pharmaceutical interests are all conspiring to prevent a cure for cancer to be revealed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
That's nice
I don't ignore it. Which trial was that excuse for failure used for? It's funny how the only trials that supposedly do not work are the ones with oversight all fail. He has been shown to have lied about corroboration on his other studies but I suppose his stated witnesses are lying too. It's just stupid on a whole lot of levels.
And let me guess HUD and Walmart conspired to tear those tenements down? Save the projects! I'll ask him about it but from a cursory search it looks like the complaint wasn't but together well. Failure to prove via the preponderance of evidence is what it is.
I just read the lower courts decision. The brief that I just read shows that the complaint was about a procedural issue and registration for noise consideration. Seeing the above, it's pretty obvious why they didn't try to argue it in the first place.Quote:
Subsequently, the Housing Authority of New Orleans, the State Historical Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (a federal agency) signed a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) for the project. Demolition began in October 2000.
Are you now saying that the local, state and federal historical societies that were asked for approval were all conspiring as well?
No, he was blackmailed by Willard and his goons, tbh....Quote:
Originally Posted by hitmanyr2k
You are talking about the wrong case. But the project I'm taking about was a historical property (regardless of what the retarded bullshit the conservative 5th Circuit wrote), and that was not the only issue either btw. You are very naive to believe that many agencies do not conspire to back each-other up. I see you like to keep talking about the lies of the FDA and Big Pharma on the good Dr. Yet you continue to ignore how they purposely did not include the key ingredient to their study so that it would appear to not work. He even warned them about this. You can't run from that. It's what happened. Any studies done by them were fraud, it was to fool the masses, which you are included in that. Btw, watch the movie I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
You did exactly what I said, looked for info and reasons to disprove what I'm saying rather than just looking into it. That's not progress, it just means you're hard headed and don't really care about the truth, so I just have to repeat it
Proof?Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipper Nation
So I just want to make sure once again.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
The FDA, DoJ, Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeals, AMA, the witnesses produced to verify several of his trials, and the Village Voice all conspired to prevent a cure for cancer from becoming available?
Please respond to this question in particular.
You might as well include the entirety of media outside of his advertisement err movie. Do you have one even somehwhat reputable outlet that corroborates Brzynski? Not your shitty blogs or movies by advertisers.
And I watched your movie. Its a few anecdotes and a one sided story. I prefer objective journalism or at least an attempt at it. It's kinda like going to a scientology 'clinic' and taking them at their word. I want verifiable proof. That guy hasn't provided it. OTOH, he does charge a few $100k to go there. And you want to call me naive.
That is because you are a fucking idiot with no critical thinking skills.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
Fucking idiots with no critical thinking skills may occasionally glom on to something with some validity, but because they beleive so many stupid things "cause I saw a youtube video about it", it generally isn't worth the time to bother with their newest stupid du jour.
Sorry.
You can't bitch about people not taking your word for it, or watching your moronic videos. You have only yourself to blame for being so unconvincing and intellectually dishonest. Stop blaming everybody else, and ask yourself why no one believes you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbrUPtwIKukQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurs da champs
No, I'm pretty smart, tbh and have whooped ur ass in debates every time simply because you don't even know what ur talking about and you think you do lol. On the other hand troll, you're just a dishonest pussy in a man's body. You hardly know shit when you reply to me with ur bs, and you think you prove anything by exclaiming "youtubes!" lol Stfu already. If you don't like the truths I post then put me on ignore and move on because I will continue to post them no matter how many idiots like you don't like it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
You actually start a thread backstabbing your own family talking shit about them because they choose (within their own rights) to not poison their child with vaccines, and you blab about how you wanna take them to court lol (but you can't afford it though LMAO!). What a misinformed backstabbing disloyal broke ass idiot. They are doing what's best for their kids and your stupid ass convinces yourself to pretend to be angry at innocent parents who care for their child. What an ignorant fool with no critical thinking skills or common sense lol. You couldn't even have the balls to tell your family you started a thread about your backstabbing them with your selfish ignorant ways I bet lol. Now that's a real pussy. Maybe if you spent less time trolling the Internets with your nonsense you could find a higher paying job lol That way you can fully backstab your family 100%
What objective proof do you have other than the advertisement of anecdotes and the uncorroborated testimony of the doctor in question?
And I figured the vaccine thing would come up. At least that had a single clinical trial that was conducted and approved even if it turns out the guy falsified the data. At least at one point there was a single shred of evidence.
It's cool. The FDA, DoJ, two levels of the federal court, the AMA, and every independent vested publication that has commented on it are all colluding to keep a cure for cancer from us. I am sure the nanotube delivery/lysing systems being developed will be scuttled if they are tested just as well.
You are going to believe what you believe based on youtube videos and blog posts or are you saying that you spend the ~$275k to enter one of his 'trials?'
And btw what was the housing project that the courts colluded with HUD to destroy?
Yeah yeah yeah. I heard that bullshit excuse before. And like I said back when that video was released, if Ron Paul was as noble and principled as his idiot supporters make him out to be he wouldn't have bent over and let Romney fuck him like a bitch. He wouldn't have let Romney get away with murder in the debates. Instead he became Romney's lackey and attacked his opponents for him. What does it say about the man that he could cast aside his principles so easily to serve a man like Mitt Romney? :lol If it was so easy for him to become a lapdog in the primaries then what do you think would happen if he made it to the white house? You guys can gloss over it all you want but to me he's no different than any other politician. When things got tough Ron Paul sold out and confused many of his supporters in the process.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipper Nation