Am I going mad or is this seriously unprecedented...by alot?
Printable View
Am I going mad or is this seriously unprecedented...by alot?
Just Stern making sure the Spurs are nice and worn down.
If you mean having two back-to-backs separated by one day off, that has happened plenty of times before. They call it a "four games in five nights." The Spurs have had a few already this season.Quote:
Originally Posted by skulls138
If you mean the schedule in general, that has happened, too, but having so many games so quickly is something that many fans and people around the team have lambasted this year.
I haven't looked at this year's schedule to see how b2b's are distributed over the course of the year, but I've also had the impression that there have been a fuckton of b2b's so far, and I assume it just means that we won't have very many in the second half of the season.
Basically we're getting them out of the way early, and the schedule should be less crazy in the Spring.
Yeah, there has been an exorbitant amount to date but it will even out. There is only one back-to-back in March. In fact, there's only two b2bs in February.
"Leading the way are nine teams with a robust 22 back-to-back situations. Those teams are the Atlanta Hawks, Boston Celtics, Brooklyn Nets, Charlotte Bobcats, Cleveland Cavaliers, Indiana Pacers, Milwaukee Bucks, Minnesota Timberwolves and Philadelphia 76ers.
On the other hand, the Orlando Magic play just 13 back-to-backs and the Oklahoma City Thunder play just 14. The Mavericks, Lakers and HEAT all play 16 back-to-backs."
http://www.hoopsworld.com/dissecting...-nba-schedule/
Spurs had 8 B2B so far and have 8 left
The worst remaining stretch is:
March 31 vs Miami
April 1 @ Memphis
April 3 vs Orlando
April 4 @ Oklahoma City on TNT
Will pop rest the whole big 3 on a TNT game again? It will be the end of the regular season
Spurs rough schedule stretch has been usually in March. This year it was in the first and half month. I like more a schedule where the rough part is at the start of the season: it will allow Spurs to be more rested for the playoffs.
After tomorrow night, that's their only remaining 4-in-5 set.Quote:
Originally Posted by eric365
By the way, if you wanted to be really conspiratorial, you might make something of the fact that every single one of the Spurs' games with the Thunder this year is part of a Spurs back-to-back. The home opener was the second night of a back-to-back; the 4/4/13 game in OKC is the same. The first game in OKC was the first game of a back-to-back that ended in Denver, and the March 11 game in SA is the first game of a back-to-back with a game the next night in Minnesota.
If you really wanted to be conspiratorial, you might observe that in the games where OKC is the second night of a back-to-back for the Spurs, the Thunder enter those games with substantial rest -- the Spurs home opener was the Thunder's first game of the season; the Thunder's last game before the 4/4 meeting is a March 30 game in Milwaukee.
I think the schedule just works out that way sometimes -- the Thunder will be on the second night of a back-to-back when they come to SA in March, and were playing (or will be playing) the first game of back-to-backs in November and April.
It's not so much the back to back as much as the 4 in 5s and the 6 in 9s. Lots of games under the belt for this time of year, it feels like anyway. We have played 5 more games than the division rival memphis for example. But it evens out I guess.
This seems rough, but as long the the Spurs get through it without major injuries it will pay off. In March and April when the other contenders are running their asses ragged the Good Guys will at least be staying at the house.
Check Spurs March Schedule.
Can you say coasting?
ESPN mentioned that after a 17 game winning streak, the Clips are only a half a game ahead of OKC. They also mentioned that the Nuggets are going to be much better than their current record because they've spent so much time on the road. Both of those factoids apply to the Spurs, as they're only a half a game back of LA and have played the same number of road games as Denver. If it were ever set up for the Spurs to go into the postseason healthy, fresh and with home court, it's this year.
jinx
It's kinda like the guys who did the schedule were still in lockout season mode. So many back to backs, 4 games in 5 nights etc. was totally unnecessary. The stupid schedule cost us 'substantial sanctions' and $250,000 already. Stupid schedule, this isn't a lockout season were they try to cram as many games in as possible.
When today started the Nugs had played 4 more road games than the Good Guys. I agree that these excessive number of road games early in the season will help the Spurs late in the year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Obstructed_View
Thanks for the correction. Either ESPN had the wrong numbers earlier today or my math is REALLY bad. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Strategic
You're right. A relatively easy schedule with the RRT to keep them sharp should be perfect.
And this means that after the Clips' loss last night the Spurs now lead the league in SRS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Obstructed_View
YEP the dirty bum COMMISH tried to make sure the Spurs were out early and often! They are what 26-8 though with the kitchen sink thrown at them? NICE try BUM, it will even out and the Spurs will win more.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
They try to set you up to fail if you are the Spurs not a media darling! If it were the Heat they would not let it happen, Gaykers nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Russo21
Also strange that this Knicks game is on the Thursday TNT time slot, only that its not being televised by TNT...or any other game.
Yet only 2 games are scheduled.
Seriously what is the NBA trying to pull?
Yup. Stern fails again!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Cagney
http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/8638/sternpop.gif
clips went on a 17 game win streak, during which we had a stretch where we lost 4 of 5... and as of tonight we stand better than them :lol
Maybe TNT suits feared getting "Popsicled" again? But then again, the Spurs bench almost laid it to the Heat and the Knicks aren't nearly as good.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurs1990
It's the week of the New Year too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strategic
Yeah maybe a college football game planned.Quote:
Originally Posted by racm
Very true. The Nuggests have been on the road even more than the Spurs, they've played 2/3 of their games away from home. There a few teams like that in the league, though not to this extreme, the Spurs including. It's interesting to note that there are only 5 teams in the entire NBA with .500 or sub .500 record at home. This makes road wins very valuable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Obstructed_View
As we've seen the past few seasons homecourt won't mean much in the playoffs. Improving the defense and not allowing easy baskets will mean more. The Spurs have to be more consistent defensively.
Whoa, two road games the whole month? Tons of rest. Awesome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowflames
You want the rough part at the end of the season? Don't you mean the opposite? How would they be more rested with a tougher schedule to finish the season?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno
My bad, I meant I like if more when the difficult part of the schedule is early in the season like this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice009
Yup...The Fiesta Bowl is tonight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strategic
That should depend on seeding - and not just if the first seed is at stake. Pop should consider first round matchups, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by eric365
But it would be really funny if he rested the Big 3 that game. Stern would be pissed.