What if Kevin Garnett demended a trade?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TDMVPDPOY

how about spurs give wolves

parker
Gino
scola
1 draft pick

for KG

---

i would love to have KG play with DUNCAN... but it ain't gonna happen

KG has a BIG EGO... he'd rather lose rest of his career or retire early than play w/ TD... which is plain STUPID!!! he just doesn't wanna be known as TIMMYs counterpart... he wants to be TIMMY, he's been trying for 8 years now... too bad he ain't timmy, and he never will be... but if he and timmy became ONE!!! there is NO STOPPING US...

but i would hate to lose MANU for KG... but just imagine (i know, i know... stop imagining)... but can ya picture TD, KG, MANU... as our three superstars, WOW!!!

this is what we would trade... (this is just a dream guys, i am not serious... or am i???)

RASHO (i doubt they'd want him back, but we are dreaming so it can happen),

TONY (no!!! but for KG yes! :( ),

SCOLA (:( ),

rights to IAN MAHINMI ( :( )

and a FIRST ROUND PICK...

that still too less... throw in MANU and it would be a done deal, but i can never see MANU leave... what else could be thrown in there for a chance of getting KG... (don't include TIMMY or MANU)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nkdlunch

If Spursdaone was in charge of the Spurs management, we would be on our way to being the next NY Knicks!

---

If the spurs management listened to some of you nothing would change and age will take out the spurs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

I think if he demanded a trade the spurs should be the first one in the line to get him. Just trade Duncan and he is ours.

---

Man give it up already, KG is nothing compared to TD, how does it taste, having KG's nuts in your mouth?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TDMVPDPOY

how about spurs give wolves

parker
Gino
scola
1 draft pick

for KG

---

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...



Are you sure you are a Spurs fan?

Kinda salty :lol I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Useruser666

Spursdaone is not a Spurs fan.

---

we have already established that last week when we compared stats and it still showed Duncan was better even if it was by a few things he was still statistically better. Spursdaone is on crack.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by batman2883

we have already established that last week when we compared stats and it still showed Duncan was better even if it was by a few things he was still statistically better. Spursdaone is on crack.

---

You never proved shit about the stats. Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Kinda salty :lol I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

---

Ignorant??? No its called being smart, if it aint broken dont fix it, we all know TD is the main reason we win each year. We also know that KG is the main reason they lose every year, he chokes down the stretch, he has too much of a say so on who goes into Minny, most of the fault should be blamed on him for having such a mediocre team.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

You never proved shit about the stats. Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

---

oh man yes we did someone else had posted it and you complained cause you said the first few years of Garnetts stats shouldnt count since he came out of high school.

Minnesota had shit to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by batman2883

oh man yes we did someone else had posted it and you complained cause you said the first few years of Garnetts stats shouldnt count since he came out of high school.

---

The last 3 years Garnett has been the stat leader so you are owned. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

The last 3 years Garnett has been the stat leader so you are owned. :lol

---

overall career wise TD has been the leader so that makes KG owned, and once again lets not even talk about the hardware.....Who is the two time league MVP back to back? Who has 3 finals MVP trophies, 1 all star game mvp, and 3 Championship rings??? i know KG has pretty much nothing in comparison with TD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Minnesota had shit to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

---

Here is your answer to that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Here is your answer to that

---

Here is your answer to that lame excuse, OWNED....KG IS OWNED. Overrated choke artist

This site might help you to how much Garnett was better than Duncan in 2003-04. http://www.nba.com/statistics/2003/d...opic=0&stat=27

lol yo spurdaone , are u still on that shit, bout statistics
Duncans last 2 seasons have been riddled with injury comin off playin in the summer
so his stats have been career lows

You making excuses for Duncan about why Garnett clearly owned him. 69 games is pretty good in my opinion. Those 13 games were missed late in the season so he was healthy for most of the games he played during the season. Garnett is the better player now and Duncan having so many injuries is not a good thing for longevity. Webber had that same problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

You making excuses for Duncan about why Garnett clearly owned him. 69 games is pretty good in my opinion. Those 13 games were missed late in the season so he was healthy for most of the games he played during the season. Garnett is the better player now and Duncan having so many injuries is not a good thing for longevity. Webber had that same problem.

---

Dude, STFU.

Tim Duncan is a leader. Kevin Garnett is a choke artist. Tim Duncan is a back-to-back NBA MVP winner. Kevin Garnett has won once. Tim Duncan is All-NBA First Team his whole career. Tim Duncan has been to the Finals three times, Garnett none. Tim has 3 Finals MVP trophies, Garnett has none. Tim Duncan has 3 rings, and Garnett has none. The Tim Duncan Spurs have 3 Larry O'Brien trophies, the Kevin Garnett Wolves have none.

There's some stats for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Kinda salty :lol I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

---

Duncan Born: 1976, April 25
Garnett Born: 1976, May 19

Garnett is almost a month younger, man, I am sure Garnett has much much more potential, he could win another MVP, 3 Finals and 3 Finals MVP in the next month.

BTW, please say "Hi" to ignorance for me, haven't seen him for a while, and I suspect he's with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

I think if he demanded a trade the spurs should be the first one in the line to get him. Just trade Duncan and he is ours.

---

fuck that, timmys better (i dont want to argue that now.) but I like the way things are and we don't need to trade timmy for Garnett. period If he demanded a trade for the wolves I think we got nothing for them. exept a couple of players. But I don't even like that idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

This site might help you to how much Garnett was better than Duncan in 2003-04. http://www.nba.com/statistics/2003/d...opic=0&stat=27

---

Do they also show how, statistically, Bowen is better than Stockton on defense too?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=177

How does biting yourself in the ass feels?

Quote:

---

Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

---

Led his team straight to the lottery.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TexasBalla1001

Dude, STFU.

Tim Duncan is a leader. Kevin Garnett is a choke artist. Tim Duncan is a back-to-back NBA MVP winner. Kevin Garnett has won once. Tim Duncan is All-NBA First Team his whole career. Tim Duncan has been to the Finals three times, Garnett none. Tim has 3 Finals MVP trophies, Garnett has none. Tim Duncan has 3 rings, and Garnett has none. The Tim Duncan Spurs have 3 Larry O'Brien trophies, the Kevin Garnett Wolves have none.

There's some stats for you.

---

If you consider accomplishments as stats than Billups is better than Garnett. Give me a break about accomplishments. You are missing the point about how good Garnett. They are both great but you haven't seen that Garnett brings more to his team than Duncan. More rebounding, more passing, and more energy. It's to bad he is on a old team that would be last place without him.

Quote:

---

They are both great but you haven't seen that Garnett brings more to his team than Duncan.

---

You're right -- I haven't seen that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Minnesota had shit to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

---

Garnett's supporting casts have better stats than Duncan's supporting casts, so by your logic
Garnett's supportin cast > Duncan's supporting cast.
But as we can see from all the championships, Spurs > Wolves
Since Spurs = Duncan + Duncan's supporting cast (by definition) and
Wolves = Garnett + Garnett's supporting cast, we can easily derive the following:
Duncan >> Garnett.