What if Kevin Garnett demended a trade?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nkdlunch

Dude wtf u talking about??? the wolvies are nothing like the old bulls. The 90s bulls had another superstar in his prime, Pippen and they had a real hunger for winning. Plus they had Phil Jackson. WTF do the wolvies have? Cassell and Spree? and zerbiak?? :lol

---

Another misunderstanding. I said it poorly but who knows how good Garnett would be on a team that is talented as what Jordan or Duncan had. Sorry for the confusion. I was typing fast and left some info out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Talent wise Garnett is better ...

---

You can't be serious? That's why KG has so many rings and Tim has none, yes?

LMAO! :spin

(you're kidding, right?)

I count athleticism and finesse as talent. Garnett is better in athleticism and equal in finesse. Shooting, passing, timing, and etc is an example of finesse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

I count athleticism and finesse as talent. Garnett is better in athleticism and equal in finesse. Shooting, passing, timing, and etc is an example of finesse.

---

Yes , he is so good that he couldn't lead his team to the playoffs.
:blah :blah
man, stop living on a fantasy..
In the real world, the best KG did in 10 years was to lose to the lakers in 2004 WCF.

what a f***ing joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dn0

Yes , he is so good that he couldn't lead his team to the playoffs.
:blah :blah
man, stop living on a fantasy..
In the real world, the best KG did in 10 years was to lose to the lakers in 2004 WCF.

what a f***ing joke.

---

I'm sorry that you don't get that 1 player can't win a championship by himself. It has never happened.

Quote:

---

What if Kevin Garnett demended a trade?

---

If KG demended a trade I probably wouldn't worry one bit if I were Minnesota.

However, if he demanded a trade. . .well. . .that would be something different altogether now wouldn't it?!!

KG leads Duncan in punching teammates. Case closed!

[Waits for Marcus to start a "Free Agent: Rick Rickert" thread]

KG might start making some threats, but I don't think anyone in Minnesota would let them get very far. They won't let him go. They'd throw out the entire team and start over, if that was what KG wanted. They'll go after whoever he wants them to go after. Much like SA and Timmy, Minnesota knows KG's value and isn't going to let him go. But they're going to have to seriously re-vamp this offseason. I expect SPree and Cassell both gone, maybe others. Does KG like Trenton Hassell and Wally? Because if he doesn't they're pretty much gone.

Minnesota needs to replace Kandi. Wouldn't be surprised to see them go after Eddy Curry or Dalembert. Then they need a new, younger PG.

KG being traded is more likely than KG winning a title.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Useruser666

KG being traded is more likely than KG winning a title.

---

If KG gets traded there would only be a few worse teams that he could play on than what he has now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

If KG gets traded there would only be a few worse teams that he could play on than what he has now.

---

Actually... no


KG is not being traded, he's a franchise player... and teams don't get rid of those.. especially if it's players like him or Tim...

Spursdaone....how bout you come back when KG wins 1, not 2 not 3, but just O-N-E championship. Then you can back up your argument, until then STFU!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

It would take more than Kobe for LAL to get them. You could only trade Garnett for Duncan, Garnett for Stoudemire, Garnett for L. James, and Garnett for Wade.

---

TD FOR GARNETT= THE SPURS WOULDNT EVEN CONSIDER IT... AMARE FOR GARNETT= NOPE. JAMES FOR GARNETT=UH UH U MUST BE NUTS. WADE FOR GARNETT= UUUUUH MAAAYBE NOT

THE 4 PLAYERS U STATED ARE VALUED 2 MUCH BY THERE RESPECTIVE TEAMS TO EVEN CONSIDER KG...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE3000

TD FOR GARNETT= THE SPURS WOULDNT EVEN CONSIDER IT... AMARE FOR GARNETT= NOPE. JAMES FOR GARNETT=UH UH U MUST BE NUTS. WADE FOR GARNETT= UUUUUH MAAAYBE NOT

THE 4 PLAYERS U STATED ARE VALUED 2 MUCH BY THERE RESPECTIVE TEAMS TO EVEN CONSIDER KG...

---

Agreed, I wouldn't even consider trading Nazr for KG!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Which team has a better point guard? San Antonio
Which team has better ball movement? San Antonio
Which team has better defense? San Antonio
All of this effects how much a great player can help their team.
Garnett with Parker would be a improvement over the always shooting first Cassell and Hudson. You haven't seen Garnett do that because you haven't watched many of his games. He would love for his team to do 1 of the above.

---

Tony wouldnt be as good with KG...
Tim is the anchor of SA DEFENSE... KG simply dont provide the right leadership to anchor his team the way TD does...
ball movement.... see reason why defense is better

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ambchang

And Spursdaone, don't avoid the real question, tell me how Garnett is better than Duncan due to stats, while Garnett's supporting casts are worse than Duncan's despite stats.

---

ur makin a fool of this clown :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

There is no simple way of answering that question without going into detail. Tell me how the 80's Jordan was better than Duncan. He didn't win any championships at that time.

---

the 80, Jordan was NOT better than TD!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

I count athleticism and finesse as talent. Garnett is better in athleticism and equal in finesse. Shooting, passing, timing, and etc is an example of finesse.

---

That's why Harold Minor is better than Magic Johnson and Larry Bird combined!
Still haven't told me how Garnett is better than Duncan due to stats, while Garnett's supporting casts are worse than Duncan's despite stats.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Useruser666

KG being traded is more likely than KG winning a title.

---

WORD-UP!!

KG proves that he is the best player in the game by the way he comes out every night and plays his guts out. Now that is a leader. Duncan sometimes doesn't show enough emotion or caring enough. He needs to be more vocal. I would rather have KG because of that reason alone. He has outplayed Duncan the last 3 years on stats and you would have to be stupid to say he has good teammates.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Useruser666

Spursdaone is not a Spurs fan.

---

Agreed!

Allen Iverson plays his guts out everynight. Manu plays his guts out everynight. Heck, Bruce Bowen plays his guts out everynight. Does that mean they are better plays than KG or TD? Thats weak. Saying KG shows more emotion, so therefore hes better is also a weak argument. Thats like saying 'I show more emotion than einstein, therefore i must be smarter then him'.

I think the best way of showing that TD is better than KG is probably the .702 winning percentage in 8 years (or whatever the exact stat is). RESULTS are what counts.

That is a weak argument because that is the same as saying Billups is better than KG because Detroit has been better the last 2 years. Watch the games of Minnesota learn something. Sprewell sucks. Szerbiak sucks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

That is a weak argument because that is the same as saying Billups is better than KG because Detroit has been better the last 2 years. Watch the games of Minnesota learn something. Sprewell sucks. Szerbiak sucks.

---

.... you are no Spurs fan.