why would anyone give up richard jefferson, a potential allstar, for a mediocre center like rash?
Printable View
why would anyone give up richard jefferson, a potential allstar, for a mediocre center like rash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chump on 7/1
You sure you weren't taking the tutorial not giving it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chump today
no charge
Yes. Jefferson makes about $10M this season, I believe.Quote:
Originally Posted by BronxCowboy
If the Spurs trade Rasho, Nazr will probably raise his contract price through the roof next summer.
Is there a second of all, or do you just like typing random words in your posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Michaels
*Disclaimer: You're right that such a trade will never happen. If it did, I would wonder what kind of secrets the Nets doctors were hiding about RJ.
Is that offer on the table?Quote:
You sure you weren't taking the tutorial not giving it?
Has it been refused?
No.
It's hy
po
the
tic
al
Say it slowly. I know you can do it.....
Now you can show me the link where I said "Rasho will be a Hawk -- it's a lock!"
When Rasho is traded and if Nazr works out ok and tries to put the $ squeeze on the Spurs he will be gone. This is assuming Oberto lives up to expections. Javokatos
will be here in 2006-2007 and should be able to fill the bill and we might be able to get someone to help in the Raso trade, or the Nazr trade, if one comes about.
everything any body says on the board is the same as you saying
"Hawks would trade Diaw for Rasho straight up". So what we need written statement from RC and King saying that the trade was offered and denied?
you think people are stating fact when they say "[insert team] will win the championship" or "if we had Payton we'd win 5 championships"
you speculated/made a hypothesis, which right now looks wrong (who know the trade may go down -- in that case you'd have been correct 7/1 and wrong yesterday).
I don't know how the intelligent posters see it but you logic looks an awfully lot like:
if chump said it = true
I can almost hear you brain cranking with all the qualifiers and word play...
A news report citing those players would be fine.Quote:
So what we need written statement from RC and King saying that the trade was offered and denied?
so if we were to cut Rasho or dump him or trade assets to get rid of him you couldn't take the baby step to say 'if deal worse than rasho for diaw = true then rasho for diaw hypothesis I had was wrong'
this is whole new level of dancing dude
chump = whott
you've become your greatest fear. the irony
If Rasho for Diaw was turned down, you can throw a party.
Just link it.
huh?Quote:
If Rasho for Diaw was turned down, you can throw a party.
are you in a fetal position sucking you thumb?
Now you're just babbling.
Still looking for links?
can you re-igore me? thanks
I never had you on ignore. You just weren't interesting enough to converse with until you started pimping the seventh swingman on a six-swingman team.
can you igore me? thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by spvrs
We need a 3 teams trade for Rasho, for make a trade exemption, like the Nets when traded K-Mart, with that trade we can save almost 50% of his contract
We would likely get a trade exception if we traded with Atlanta.
you know the definition of ignore?
I would do it to you but you are such a pompous ass that you've disabled it
the stubborn retard has won. I surrender. phrase circular logic is now chump logic...Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by spvrs
I surrender.
the whott is dead... long live dump :king
You were calling me out in another thread Sybil....Quote:
you know the definition of ignore?
Not my doing -- and you certainly don't need to read or respond to my posts.Quote:
I would do it to you but you are such a pompous ass that you've disabled it
Dumped.
did you check the times on those posts? where they before or after I said ignore?
hmmmm..... is this a hypothesis or fact?Quote:
Not my doing
p.s. the questions are rhetorical... no need to respond