When Curry wins 6 Finals MVPs, we'll talk about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Printable View
When Curry wins 6 Finals MVPs, we'll talk about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
i'm not asking you if curry is as good as jordan. your reading comprehension needs work, which is odd for an educated man. i simply asked if Michael Jordan fits your description of a chuckerQuote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Is Curry a chucker? You never admitted to what the OP is about yet you expect to introduce your own little red herring and hope that gets you back on your feet here? I don't get trolled, son.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
i'm not trolling at all, really. in fact, i'm asking a very, very simple question. it would take a very simple person not to be able to answer itQuote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Shitty tactic that's easily read and thwarted. You now have nothing but a MJ comparison with Curry but you'll keep responding as a defensive mechanism.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
i never once compared the two. every time i asked about MJ, i only specifically asked if he was a chucker. its a yes or no question, with a simple yes or no answer, which you have failed to provideQuote:
Originally Posted by DMC
DMC: Steph wants to be Kobe
spurraider21: He's the best ever
DMC: He's a chucker because of:
A.
B.
C.
spurraider21: What about MJ?
:lmao
i never said he's the best ever.
DMC can't make an argument so he puts words in my mouth then adds an emoticon. nice.
and btw i asked the MJ question months ago back when this thread was fresh and you ignored it then too. why you dodging a simple question?
:lol I can't believe posters like DMC and Shadowflames believed the Thunder would be better off without Russ
:lol the !njun now doubling down on his shitty takes
i asked this on may 7, tbhQuote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Do you know what "concede" means?Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
con·cede
kənˈsēd/
verb
verb: concede; 3rd person present: concedes; past tense: conceded; past participle: conceded; gerund or present participle: conceding
1.
admit that something is true or valid after first denying or resisting it.
Where did I deny or resist your suggestion that MJ is a chucker?
Since I pointed that out to you back then and you never corrected it, why should I ever answer it? It's a misleading question.
oh, i haven't corrected it? how about all these i've asked you recently?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
dodging a simple yes or no question :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
which of those 4 was misleading? just give me a yes or no. any other answer you give me would be more complicated. keep it simple. yes or no.
Kiteo, his eyes closedQuote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
You didn't correct it. You proceeded to use your initial false premise as a platform for asking that question. Since you referenced that initial false premise, you've still not corrected it. You're still working from a false premise.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Do you wish to concede your original question was based on a false premise? If so, perhaps we can proceed.
Sure. i meant cede instead of concede. now that formalities are out of the way, would you categorize Michael Jordan as a chucker based on the requisites you have presented?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
Cede means "give up". In order to "give up" I would have to have something I was trying to hold onto. I never such an assertion. So you need to relinquish the entire aspect of that question and just admit you planted that seed yourself so you could grow your conclusion on those grounds. Just relinquish it and ask the question you intend to ask. Don't try to repair it.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Do you relinquish the question? Are you willing to start over with the question in a new form, without the premise that I hold any particular position on MJ?
if you are more interested in playing grammar wars than talking basketball, then it shows how secure you are with your argument. i have asked you a VERY simple question which requires a 1 word answer, and you've been dancing and dodging around it like a bullfighter. yes or no. is michael jordan a chucker?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
You started with a lie. You accused me of holding a certain position that I never said I hold. You've yet to admit to that, calling it a grammar error instead, even though your intended version was still wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
When you can correct that, we can proceed.
summary of DMC in this thread in responce to a very simple yes or no question:
http://imgur.com/zUb5W.gif
you know what, i'll play along in your sad game. fine. i lied. i said concede when it wasn't the right word. i was grammatically off base. :cry
now that the air has been cleared, let us proceed. was michael jordan a chucker, based on the very standards you have set?
What standards would that be, liar?Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
so if you claim you've made points A B and C, you know damn well what your standards are... or you were lying.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMC
and :lol calling me a liar because I used the word concede instead of agree
I simply asked which standards you're referring to. I pointed out Curry's tendencies, not Mike's. I never called them standards.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Actually no, you called yourself a liar. I just called you what you admitted to being.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
I asked several people here to define "chucker" and instead of getting a standard, I got some pics. Identifying a chucker isn't the same as defining the term.
So show me the standards I applied to Curry.