Printable View
Why ESPN? No mention at all that the Spurs had just as much of a layoff as the Heat.
You can't have it both ways.
Heat come out and fall behind early, and they are all like "Oh yeah gotta settle down and get the rust off". The Spurs come out and fall behind early, and they are all like "Oh man the Warriors came out with a lot more energy", not that the Spurs were missing wide open shots left and right, and making defensive errors they usually don't make.
The Spurs won, so they don't need any excuses.
Real talkQuote:
Originally Posted by tesseractive
I'm talking about during the game as much as after the game. I watched both games, and it was all rust...rust...rust during the Heat game, and not even a mention of rust at any point during the Spurs game.
Then it's the same thing again on Sportscenter now.
The announcers spoke briefly asking if you could chalk up the Spurs poor performance for most of the game to rust but I believe it was Webber who immediately said the Spurs are a team that don't make excuses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat67
Winning rusty is winning
The game was on tnt not espn. Heat game had kerr. He is a hack and brings up cliches. Spurs game had webber. He is og.
Yeah, but they had game recaps on ESPN SportsCenter where they said the Heat were rusty.Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeh8u
And ours wasn't so much caused by rust (not too many lazy turnovers I don't think) just by an inability to stop Curry
Rightfully so. Excuses are for soft teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stabula
I don't know, but TP needs to start balling early and not look like a scrub for the first half of the game. Spurs missed an enormous amount of layups.
because
1) they won
2) theyre the spurs
Because the Spurs weren't rusty, but just plain bad? A team isn't rusty when its coach starts the turd towers or goes for 4-guard line-ups...
ESPN is giving the Spurs a lot of credit for winning this game and the coverage seems pretty good. Just check the Daily Dime to see what I mean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tesseractive
How long have you been a Spurs fan? This is nothing new dude.
Get used to 4 guard lineups, the only way to guard them.Quote:
Originally Posted by will_spurs
Unless Diaw and Kawhi are now guards, the end of the game shows it's not. That doesn't change even with Thompson in.Quote:
Originally Posted by EricB
It was more of a college lineup, three guards and two forwards, with nobody taller than 6-8.Quote:
Originally Posted by EricB
I get it that sometimes/often ESPN takes shots at San Antonio, but I think you're reeeeally reaching here with this one
http://espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2013...ame-1-reaction
4. What's your takeaway from Game 1 on the Spurs?
Gordian: It's hard to draw too many conclusions after one game, even one of that magnitude. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the Spurs played more "small ball" going forward. San Antonio's small units score very efficiently and, if the Spurs struggle to slow the Warriors' hot shooting, they're going to need to match it.
Palmer: They're the Evander Holyfield of the NBA. Heart of a champion. I hear Rudy T in my ear when I watch them.
Shelburne: They're still the Spurs. The original "next man up" team got key buckets from Danny Green and defensive play from Kawhi Leonard to make up for an awful shooting night from Manu Ginobili and a flu-ridden Tim Duncan. It wasn't pretty, and the Spurs don't want to try that again, but they came out ahead in a game they had no business winning to hold serve in what promises to be a rugged series.
Stein: That the Spurs, as rusty as they looked, really are in Golden State's head. Because the Dubs -- as slow as San Antonio looked at times trying to keep tabs on Curry -- must think by now that they're never going to win a game in that building. I know those of us in the media tend to overreact about how mentally damaging any one loss is, but this ain't just one loss. This is 30 straight losses in San Antonio dating to Valentine's Day 1997 as well as the second straight playoff game on a massive stage that Golden State unraveled in a huge way in the fourth quarter.
Strauss: Without Tim Duncan or Tiago Splitter, this isn't the Spurs. Since Duncan was ill and Splitter was out, San Antonio looked weak defensively on pick-and-rolls. That will probably change in the future. The Warriors likely lost to San Antonio at its weakest point.
people still watch ESPN?
What about the Lakers? The story line was that they were too wounded to even put up a fight against the Spurs, yet a similarly shorthanded Chicago team can end a 27 game winning streak and win a playoff game on the road against the defending champs (who are 40-1 against the rest of the NBA over their last 43 games).
I noticed that too. The Warriors are a great defensive team, but the Heat were just rusty. Kind of a slap in the face to both the Bulls and the Spurs tbh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat67
It only matters if the Spurs don't come out and hit those shots and make those defensive plays in game 2, tbh.
Kurt Rambis on ESPN said the Heat were obviously rusty but that the Spurs troubles in the first 3 quarters were due to the Warriors playing magnificent basketball and that it gives him good reason to think they can win this series. That's just how they are over there, unfortunately.
What? Kerr is one of the best color commentators out there. Webber doesn't know much at all about the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeh8u
.double post.
He is good at basketball knowledge no doubt, but to me he plays the role of analyst more than being himself. He uses a lot of psychology talk bs. Reads too much into body language, etc. Hacky cliché type of stuff. Chris acts more like himself, he has a few cliches he picked up during his tenure at turner but I feel he is more genuineQuote:
Originally Posted by SpursRock20
OP, that's been annoying me too. A bunch of the talking heads on ESPN keep talking about how the Warriors dominated the Spurs and showed how great they are and how bad the Spurs are, but just claim the Heat were rusty.
I mean, how hard is it to put two and two together, and just understand that the Spurs sucked at first because of rust as well? Their logic, as usual, is incredibly inconsistent.
It isn't just Rambis either, it's also Skip Bayless (the cowardly bandwagoner) and I'm sure others who had the same "Heat were just rusty but Spurs just suck" take. I think one of the idiots on Around the Horn did it too. Israel whatshisname I think it was.
I think they were a tad bit rusty, but not at all like the heat were. Spurs Scored 25 in the 1st qtr, 24 in the 2nd, 31 in the 3rd, and 26 in the 4th. Those are great numbers, that's not necessarily rust. Spurs must clamp down hard on Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson. Curry must play like superman every single game in order for the warriors to win.
The 4letter does all of that...ON PURPOSE.
Thats why they suck.
The Spurs best big man was Diaw and Curry played the best game of his life.
The Spurs won
Who cares about the excuses others make. Sometimes I think you people just make these threads to troll, and wish you'd find new material to troll with
:cryQuote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat67
that link you posted in the NBA Forum reminded me of this thread. That was pretty screwed up, what that member of LG repeating what Linda Cohn said. I believe it, we're boring to them because we're professional and play the game at the best level possible. If we were a trainwreck full of dipshits, we'd provide lots of stupid narratives for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Man In Black
Yep. And with Golden State scoring like 40 points in the paint in the first half, I can't see why anyone would be brain dead enough to suggest those kind of lineups would work. With Splitter back in the lineup, Duncan can go out to the three point line and help defend the pick and roll. Everyone talks about how Joseph got torched by Curry, but he was getting beat by Curry and Bogut for a lot of those shots, and the rest he was just going right to the rim because there was nobody to block the layups. All of that sort of screams for Splitter.Quote:
Originally Posted by will_spurs
The Spurs offense was rusty but that doesn't explain the shit defense. Golden State had wide open looks all game long. And the defense was at its worst late in the third, early 4th. You'd think some of the rust would have worn off by then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat67
You can be rusty on defense as well. It's all about quick thinking and quick rotations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoops Czar
It's not just ESPN.
Anybody listen to The Basketball Jones yesterday?
Their recap of Miami-Chicago was that it was ALL rust, they spent minutes on the rust of Miami affecting guys like Battier and Anderson, etc etc.
But their recap of the Spurs-Warriors game was ALL about the refs taking the game from Golden State. They spent minutes droning on and on about over-the-back calls, Klay Thompson calls, Green calls, non-calls on the Spurs and so forth. All they talked about was how incredible Curry was and how bad the refs were. Spurs received no credit nor rust excuse.
WGAF. Win or go home.
The defense isn't rusty. It just SUCKS!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat67