-
Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
I've been screami g this same shit since at least 2009, Boner is a Massive liability on the court and we will NEVER win a titlr wth him getting significant minutes. He played less today, spurs win.
d
HE IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN THE ALBATROSS. SPURS CAN WIN BUT WONT UNTIL HE IS RELEGATED HIS RIGHTFULL ROLE AS A STEVE KERR TYPE SPOT MINUTES SET PLAY FOR 3 POINTER TYPE PLAYER
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
You Forgot Blair and Neal!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
The team that scores more point usually wins
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Blair doesn't continue to get the big minutes Boner still does.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
lol at least Bonner did good work against Dwight Coward.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheGoldStandard
The team that scores more point usually wins
The team who holds the opposing team to less points than they score usually wins too. :P
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Charlie Sheen
You, sir, are an idiot. Take a look at advanced stats. Bonner is not a horrible defender, by any means.
This.
Calling him horrible is an insult to horrible defenders.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
He had a couple sequences in the post where he held his ground tonight...
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Obstructed_View
This.
Calling him horrible is an insult to horrible defenders.
Still better than Blair, sadly.
And hey, Bonner gave one of the real frontcourt players 6 minutes of rest in the first half and didn't lose the game in those 6 minutes. I'll take it with no complaints.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Charlie Sheen
You, sir, are an idiot. Take a look at advanced stats. Bonner is not a horrible defender, by any means.
Wtf is wrong with you, yes, he is a HORRIBLE defender and always has been, the other team goes on runs when he is on the fllor, they have since 2009, even the announcer ALWAYS point out the mismatch with Boner no matter who they are playing
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Ice is cold, especially dry ice.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
he's pretty much useless when he's not hitting 3s
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tesseractive
Still better than Blair, sadly.
And hey, Bonner gave one of the real frontcourt players 6 minutes of rest in the first half and didn't lose the game in those 6 minutes. I'll take it with no complaints.
Anybody that was watching knows he's in no way better than Blair in this series. If he hadn't hustled for two offensive boards in the second game there would be literally nothing good to say about him. He cost the Spurs plenty in his six minutes while the other guys played 4 on 5. Would rather have had Mills in his spot tonight.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Obstructed_View
This.
Calling him horrible is an insult to horrible defenders.
:rollin
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Charlie Sheen
I'm going to assume you are a troll, or you seriously know zero about the NBA. Check +/- rankings for Bonner during his career.
Quite simply, if there's an advanced stat that disproves what is plainly visible on the court, like missed rotations, failing to put his hands in the air on defense, failure to box out, bad fouls, and failure to hit his shots, then that advanced stat is being misinterpreted by you.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
:lol OV going to work tbh
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Charlie Sheen just want to show he can defend better than Bonner by defending Bonner from haters.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
BONNER FUCKING SUCKS, thats all. Charlie SHEEN FUCK OFF, you are a clown he sucks. I am convinced he is that Chazley idiot.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Obstructed_View
Anybody that was watching knows he's in no way better than Blair in this series. If he hadn't hustled for two offensive boards in the second game there would be literally nothing good to say about him. He cost the Spurs plenty in his six minutes while the other guys played 4 on 5. Would rather have had Mills in his spot tonight.
If Pop doesn't think he can lean on Duncan, Splitter, and Diaw for 96 minutes, then he basically has a choice of which turd he wants to make a sandwich out of for a few minutes. Bonner was lousy, but not so lousy that he cost us the game. Maybe Blair would be a less awful turd in this series, but maybe not.
And after the rolling disaster that was playing small ball, the last thing in the world that I want to see is smallball with freaking Mills on the floor. Parker and Joseph are decent defenders who are undersized, and Golden State has taken advantage of them. Gary Neal requires opponents to account for him on the other end of the court. Mills is undersized for this series, a bad defender in the best of times, and weak as an offensive threat. I'd play Baynes at the 3 before I'd let Mills on the court in this series.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Charlie Sheen
I'm going to assume you are a troll, or you seriously know zero about the NBA. Check +/- rankings for Bonner during his career.
LOL the Irony from this dipshit! He wants us to lose if you ask me! His team is the LAKERS, this is why this fuckin dipshit pushes BONNER! Thats the only explanation!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tesseractive
If Pop doesn't think he can lean on Duncan, Splitter, and Diaw for 96 minutes, then he basically has a choice of which turd he wants to make a sandwich out of for a few minutes. Bonner was lousy, but not so lousy that he cost us the game. Maybe Blair would be a less awful turd in this series, but maybe not.
And after the rolling disaster that was playing small ball, the last thing in the world that I want to see is smallball with freaking Mills on the floor. Parker and Joseph are decent defenders who are undersized, and Golden State has taken advantage of them. Gary Neal requires opponents to account for him on the other end of the court. Mills is undersized for this series, a bad defender in the best of times, and weak as an offensive threat. I'd play Baynes at the 3 before I'd let Mills on the court in this series.
GOOD GOD why in 2013 are we still talking about F in Bonner and Blair and who is worse and who we should play! FUCK OUR LIVES! DAMN! LOL.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tesseractive
If Pop doesn't think he can lean on Duncan, Splitter, and Diaw for 96 minutes, then he basically has a choice of which turd he wants to make a sandwich out of for a few minutes. Bonner was lousy, but not so lousy that he cost us the game. Maybe Blair would be a less awful turd in this series, but maybe not.
And after the rolling disaster that was playing small ball, the last thing in the world that I want to see is smallball with freaking Mills on the floor. Parker and Joseph are decent defenders who are undersized, and Golden State has taken advantage of them. Gary Neal requires opponents to account for him on the other end of the court. Mills is undersized for this series, a bad defender in the best of times, and weak as an offensive threat. I'd play Baynes at the 3 before I'd let Mills on the court in this series.
I don't think he's serious about Mills, He was just pointing out how bad Bonner on D.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Blair> Bonner
Blair is stupid but he can at least score and grab a defensive rebound
also has way more hustle then Bonner
Blairs stupidity can work for him since hes too dumb to get scared of the moment
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Bonner for Lebron straight up imho. Do it RC tbh.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sean Cagney
LOL the Irony from this dipshit! He wants us to lose if you ask me! His team is the LAKERS, this is why this fuckin dipshit pushes BONNER! Thats the only explanation!
GOOD GOD why in 2013 are we still talking about F in Bonner and Blair and who is worse and who we should play! FUCK OUR LIVES! DAMN! LOL.
The difference is that now that Splitter and Diaw are back, we're talking about who plays spot minutes as the 4th big man, not which of them is less of a disaster as a starter. Huge difference.
We've got 7 real players for this series, and we only have to suffer through a few shitty minutes of Bonner, Neal, and Joseph (or whoever). 7 proven players isn't terrible -- I think it'll be enough to move on to the next round.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sean Cagney
BONNER FUCKING SUCKS, thats all. Charlie SHEEN FUCK OFF, you are a clown he sucks. I am convinced he is that Chazley idiot.
:lmao
Hopefully that would be the closer.
-
Re: Bonner is huge defensive liability!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tesseractive
The difference is that now that Splitter and Diaw are back, we're talking about who plays spot minutes as the 4th big man, not which of them is less of a disaster as a starter. Huge difference.
We've got 7 real players for this series, and we only have to suffer through a few shitty minutes of Bonner, Neal, and Joseph (or whoever). 7 proven players isn't terrible -- I think it'll be enough to move on to the next round.
I hope so man! Those guys are pretty much worthless alot of the time! I said here tonight GOD our role players suck lol! I said that a few times. Some of them year after year just such in the playoffs so bad it's a miracle they still get a minute during the playoffs! I guess we have to, but my GOD they suck lol. I like Diaw and Ginobili is okay off the bench! Splitter is not bad all the time, but my GOD our role players suck alot of times. I hate a 7 man rotation but thats what it is alot of times, the rest just dissapear.