Flagrant Foul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Obstructed_View

Manny's got too many fucking problems to list. He thinks Manu's to blame for 2006. Lost cause.

---

Link to where I ever claimed that? Manu made a really stupid foul in 2006. One of the dumbest fouls in Spurs history. Lots of things could have changed the outcome of the game. You're a fucking moron.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

When you are asked directly for a link to the actual rule from the rule book, it is not good enough.

Post the actual rule from the actual rule book.

I triple dog dare you.

---

I'm satisfied with the rule explanations posted for everyone's convenience at the official site of the nba. The only reason you aren't is because you found out it doesn't jibe with your misconceptions of reality. We already know you won't be satisfied until the rulebook is updated. It may never be. I'm sorry to say your puckered pooter won't get the deep penetration and satisfaction it so desperately craves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Manu made a really stupid foul in 2006. One of the dumbest fouls in Spurs history.

---

And if Manu hadn't made a 3-pointer before that, the Spurs wouldn't have even had a 104-101 lead to begin with.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

Rules and regulations: Flagrant Fouls

By Official NBA Rules
Posted Apr 18 2010 7:54PM

The following is a summary of rules and regulations regarding flagrant fouls, technical fouls, elbow fouls and other player conduct issues.

---

Not the actual rules.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TJastal

I'm satisfied with the rule explanations posted for everyone's convenience at the official site of the nba. The only reason you aren't is because you found out it doesn't jibe with your misconceptions of reality. We already know you won't be satisfied until the rulebook is updated. It may never be. I'm sorry to say your puckered pooter won't get the deep penetration and satisfaction it so desperately craves.

---

U mad, and fantasizing about me again.

You certainly are afraid to post the actual flagrant foul rule.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs and Mavs fan

And if Manu hadn't made a 3-pointer before that, the Spurs wouldn't have even had a 104-101 lead to begin with.

---

And? This doesn't excuse stupid fouls at stupid times. Manu made several great plays in that comeback. None of that changes the fact that Manu committed one of the dumbest fouls in Spurs history.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Not the actual rules.

U mad, and fantasizing about me again.

You certainly are afraid to post the actual flagrant foul rule.

---

Not afraid of anything. The nba basically acknowledged the rulebook wasn't adequate when they provided more detailed information on their website by one named "Official NBA Rules" (The name being a strong hint as to what was contained within). That you keep failing to a knowledge the reality of this isn't anyone else's problem but yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2centsworth

The rule book is pretty clear and states an elbow to the head, excessive or not, is an automatic ejection. Wade got to elbow someone in the head and miss no playing time, which clearly compromises the intent of the rule to protect from head injuries/concussions.

---

I have yet to hear what exactly Wade was attempting to do?

Players moving up court and he finds it appropriate to jump up and aim an elbow at the head from behind?

what in God's name was he doing?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TJastal

Not afraid of anything.

---

Then post the actual rules.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CoachRumpHumper

I'm real worked up.

---

Humpy i just sent payment for these to OilCan Harrys for you/Blake:
http://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/570....340502769.jpg

http://www.littlepinkumbrella.com/dr...pe.php?id=3196

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

I'm worked up because I completely agree with ChumpDumper, but feel kinda dumb for reposting TJ's article while I do not agree with him.

---

I guess they know you really well at OCH.

Never been there myself.

Why don't you post the rule Humpy?
Are you afraid?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

Why don't you post the rule Humpy?
Are you afraid?

---

On the contrary, I am making fun of the people who won't post it because they know it will seriously damage their argument.

And they hate it.

Why would I end that prematurely by myself?

Nothing is stopping you from giving it another try though.

^^ confusing. You're copping out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

^^ confusing. You're copping out.

---

What part is confusing to you?

I'm here to help people understand, apparently.

:lol you're talking in circles and fantasizing about what others think of you. Grow up.
If you don't know the flagrant rule/afraid to post it, own up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

:lol you're talking in circles and fantasizing about what others think of you. Grow up.

---

They are the ones making the fantasy posts.

Including you. Take your own advice.

Quote:

---

If you don't know the flagrant rule/afraid to post it, own up.

---

As I explained, I and I suspect those I have asked to post the rule looked up the rule long ago. They won't post it because they know it will hurt their stated positions in this thread. I won't post it because I am having a good time making fun of those who are afraid to post it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

They are the ones making the fantasy posts.

Including you. Take your own advice.
As I explained, I and I suspect those I have asked to post the rule looked up the rule long ago. They won't post it because they know it will hurt their stated positions in this thread. I won't post it because I am having a good time making fun of those who are afraid to post it.

---

Ya. Cool story.
http://suite101.com/article/malignant-narcissism-a29906

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fabbs

Ya. Cool story.

---

It's the story of your posting about my going to a gay bar in Austin.

If you don't want me to talk about your posting about me, don't post about me.

Let me know if there is a part of that you don't understand.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why Chumpdumber has seventy-five THOUSAND posts, seventy-four thousand, nine hundred eighty of which don't really add anything to a discussion.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why people resort to ad hominems and post count smack when they can't concede a simple point out of abject fear.

Hell yes I'm going to have fun with that. No one has posted the rule, including you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why people resort to ad hominems and post count smack when they can't concede a simple point out of abject fear.

Hell yes I'm going to have fun with that. No one has posted the rule, including you.

---

The nba made it clear they think intent matters on their official website. Nobody really cares if the rulebook includes this or not, except you apparently. The longer you fail to recognize the reality of this the more idiotic you appear. So please, by all means, continue championing your failed position. By the time your finally finished you will be the laughingstock of all of spurstalk for the rest of eternity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Obstructed_View

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why Chumpdumber has seventy-five THOUSAND posts, seventy-four thousand, nine hundred eighty of which don't really add anything to a discussion.

---

:lol

He's probably got his own pocket rule book.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TJastal

The nba made it clear they think intent matters on their official website. Nobody really cares if the rulebook includes this or not, except you apparently. The longer you fail to recognize the reality of this the more idiotic you appear. So please, by all means, continue championing your failed position. By the time your finally finished you will be the laughingstock of all of spurstalk for the rest of eternity.

---

My position is great -- you are still afraid to psot the flagrant foul rule and getting angrier with every post. Win + bonus for me.

Your position, otoh, is more akin to some of your other notable takes like your predictions for Splitter in the NBA -- just really wrong and honestly just another thing for you to get angry about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Slippy

:lol

He's probably got his own pocket rule book.

---

No. It's easily found online where all the others found it but continue to act as if it doesn't exist. Their continued refusal to acknowledge black letter rules makes me win by default. They could have posted it and continued their weakened argument with some possible success, but they just rolled over and ceded any chance they had with denial and ad hominems -- anything to preserve their e-pride on an anonymous message board in front of a bunch of strangers.

So, nobody explaining how come it was not a flagrant the foul against Manu when trying to score he was not only hacked but also violently pushed, yet it was just a "hard foul" (which I agree by the way)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why people resort to ad hominems and post count smack when they can't concede a simple point out of abject fear.

Hell yes I'm going to have fun with that. No one has posted the rule, including you.

---

:lol Like you think I've read any of your posts to this point. I just see your name over and over again playing "hey I have the last word so I rule" while the rest of us are actually discussing basketball. You're like a rash that certain posters are too stupid to realize they shouldn't scratch.