I agree with the bad timing, but as Brazil and others have said, Miami deserves a lot of credit for that...
Paul George had 5 TOs in Game 5 and 6 TOs Game 6 in the ECF. David West had 6 in Game 7. Those guys are washed up too?
Printable View
I agree with the bad timing, but as Brazil and others have said, Miami deserves a lot of credit for that...
Paul George had 5 TOs in Game 5 and 6 TOs Game 6 in the ECF. David West had 6 in Game 7. Those guys are washed up too?
Yet he has more assists and I posted his higher ast% in another thread. That and Miami's identity on D. Spurs identity on offense, should tell people everything they need to know. Instead they'll rather use incredibly flawed imagination and use that to grasp at straws when uncomfortable facts stare at them right in their faces.
He didn't shoot well. Yet is there a possibility that it hurt the team much less than what is being imagined? For starters shooting isn't a main part of his role in the Spurs lead leading create through assists-play as a team always-system. And in one interesting curveball his True shooting pct was better than Duncan's these playoffs.
Not in any way am I saying he is more valuable than our clear MVP Duncan, just throwing the possibility out there that even this poor shooting from Manu isn't enough for him to hurt the team overall on offense when you factor in his huge role in handling and creating with the ball. An area where he has career high numbers. A key area in the offensive identity that the Spurs team-version of the last two seasons is not a serious contender without. Then the haters only really have the Turnobili-myth to desperately cling on to. But it's a myth being debunked right in front of them.
edit: removed mixed up fga/fgm
he played less minutes than he ever did, especially in the first few rounds, so it's no mystery that his turnovers/game were lower than his averages. so were his points, assists, steals, etc. in the finals he had big minutes and committed crucial turnovers. 8 of them in the infamous game 6 that went to OT, and while i thought he played a good game 7 (18 points 6-12, 5 assists, 4 turnovers), all 4 of his turnovers came in the 4th quarter, especially the back to back where he 1) dropped the ball by the sideline 2) on the very next possession whizzed a pass out of bounds.
still, i think the suddenly increased role did play a huge factor in this, and had he not gotten hurt prior to the playoffs, i think he would have played much better. either that, or they had to get him going earlier in the playoffs with the big minutes. the turnovers in the finals mattered so much more because it came against miami. if you turn it over against the grizzlies, lakers, or a team out east like the pacers, it doesn't matter nearly as match as it would against a team like miami or OKC.
still, i thought manu played better than most give him credit for, but after watching game 5 and seeing how well manu played throughout game 7 (outside of that one stretch), there is ZERO doubt in my mind that we absolutely need him back. all the people calling for him to retire or for the spurs to "let him walk" are out of their damn minds and probably weren't old enough to appreciate just how valuable he has been to the team over the years, which would help you see the little things he does that still makes him valuable now
I dont care about shooting. Bad shooting nights happen. my issues were the turnovers.
For those saying to give miami credit for thier D, fine, but somehow the rest of the team only had 5 turnovers in game 6. ill say it again...5 turnovers, while manu had 8 on his own. I think you guys are giving miamis D too much credit. How many passes were unforced on the pick n roll? How many turnovers did he jump to pass and ended up caught in the air with nowhere to go?
And ive said it before, if pop is seeing that manu cant help himself and turning it over running pnr, its pop job to call off the pnr while manu had the ball. I cant count how many times I predicted a turnover as soon as tim started coming to set the pick. if I can see it, othets can see it, why cant pop see it?
Manu had this rep of being so smart on the court, but obviously thats not the case anymore.
12 turnovers in games 6 & 7 just shat over your Manu apologetics. According to Manu fanboi, these are the kinds of games in which he's supposed to shine, because he's so very competitive, or "He's Manu Ginobili," or some other tedious bollocks.
The excuses never end with Manu fanboi.
Who cares about turnovers/game if he had 8 of them in a game in which we could've rang?
Manu didn't just have the listed turn overs he also had a bunch of passes and plays that put other players on the spurs in a bad position.
To put it in perspective, for the series, Tony led the team in assists with 45, Manu was 2nd with 30, and the next best guys were Diaw and Timmy, with 10 a piece...
Sure, he screwed the pooch in Game 6. But overall for the series, Miami played a large role in making sure the Spurs couldn't play their game. They dictated a lot of things, including matchups, and you can only do that when you're a great defensive team. I frankly can't be more proud of how the team fought in that series.
people giving Miami credit are not saying that Manu didn't have a poor game just saying that Miami is putting a lot of pressure on ball handlers in general and they are the best at doing it. Parker globally did a good job not turning over because dude even bothered by his injury had more legs than Manu to escape pressure and traps. I believe a two years ago Manu would have done a better job and would have taken the opportunity to drive all night long. Issue as most have commented is that Manu has still the vision but has no more the legs to make that tricky pass. Some T/Os were unforced but it was a very physical and intense serie, when u are tired u make this kind of mistake and again give Miami credit for pushing the pace and put our guys in the red, see exhibit a. Tim first half vs. second.
:rolleyes
I would like to see the usage % from the previous years compared to this one. It surely seemed like Manu turned the ball over a lot more per every touch he had.
"team had 5 turnovers, while manu had 8 on his own."
yep, no way around that. his inconsistency game-to-game was dumbfounding.
Some are just blind now as far as homers go. The truth is the truth and what we saw out there and there is no sugar coating some of those passes. I love Manu to death but just let it go already people it is what it is and he had a nightmare finals and everyone saw it. Fans of other teams I talked to say it and people on the radio here in VA etc., can't defend it. He was just walking down and stumbling and throwing the ball to the other team, fact.
Do I want him back? Yep! I like Manu! At a different role and for less though obviously. .This is very true as well.
The guys who want Manu back are blindly hoping that he can turn it around or rebound from the mediocre year and awful postseason he just wrapped up. I used to be annoyed at threads proclaiming he is done and thought they were premature. But nostalgia, hoping, and wishing will not change reality. Manu is as done as burnt steak. I would be okay if he came back in a limited role with a new SG on the roster, but that is not going to happen and Pop will continue to ride a broken horse. It's incredibly frustrating with this guy. He's either injured, recovering from injury, or he mindfucks himself with his confidence issues. Remember how the team was rolling when manu was injured this season? In the playoffs he seemed healthy enough for once, but his decisions were horrible. The truth hurts. Why would the spurs want a player who plays like he has double vision and is drunk??? It's time to retire.
this.
I've always liked Manu more than Parker, probably still do, but CoP >>>> CoM. I can't believe some of his fanbois are still trying to defend the shit that happened. Some of them are probably emailing John Hollinger to see if he can come up with a new advanced metric to prove the opposite of what we all saw.
Manu had like 8-12 Bill Buckner moments in games 6-7 (not counting some of his really stupid passes previously), stuff that we are still trying to make sense of. I just don't think his mind was in this for some reason. I honestly don't know what happened to him. I think what pisses me off, what still gets to me, is how absolutely badass Timmy was throughout this series. At 3fucking7 years old, he was playing more badass than Lebron throughout this series. You could tell Bill Russell couldn't wait to give him that Finals MVP, and then .....nothing.
Parker deserves his blame too, but I think most of us just accept him heroballing away several key possessions, we're probably numb to it. But Manu was like watching an accident waiting to happen, in fact it did happen many different times. Maybe his body has broken down more than he's admitting and he couldn't play through it, I really don't know.
cant count the number of times I would see tim start making the move from the post to go set the screen for manu, and I was saying out loud, "no...no...no! hes gonna turn it over!" and surprise surprise, he turned it over.
its one thing to play bad. But its inexcusable to have that many unforced turnovers in a game 6 of the finals. Dudes mind is writing checks his body cant cash. If hes not willing to accept a lesser role and adjust his game, then he is at Kobe levels of stubborness and needs to go.
Good points but good luck trying to convince these delusional Manu lovers. They are the most stubborn people I have ever seen on the internet. I think they're worst than the Kobetards and Lebrontards calling their favorite player the GOAT.
i've said as much, that if his heart isn't into it anymore or if he isn't into a redemptive frame of mind, then it's best to move on. I don't think Manu would want to go out with that being his final memory, but we'll see. All that matters is the price is right.
tbh, i've watched every replay of the Spurs playoff games, but still haven't bothered watching games 6 or 7. i don't think I will for quite some time. my mind is fried from choking it away. in 2012 I blamed the officiating but this was definitely a self inflicted wound. How we clean up and move on will define this organization for a long time.
Can you translate this rubbish into TOV% and give a breakdown of A:T ratios so it's actually meaningful input?
Also, Josh "Smoove" Smith's TOV% in the playoffs was 14.6 and 11.4 a year ago vs. Ginobili's 100 (19.4 really) and 19.8 last season. Ginobili is a post-season plague; sign SMOOOOOOOOOVEE!!!!!!!
lol troof