another free agency rumor: spurs interested with john lucas III and zaza pachulia

i guess the spurs interest in FA's is boundless if these guys are being mentioned...

I don't see either of these signings eventuating

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

How many teams did you build in the NBA?

---

more then you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

more then you

---

You aren't qualified to talk then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

You aren't qualified to talk then.

---

I do not I quack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

I do not I quack

---

No, you suck.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

No, you suck.

---

Keep it professional, DPG... we're here to talk basketball...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

No, you suck.

---

on your wife tits

zaza = better bonner ..................... sign zaza................ release bonner.....................

cojo
ginobili
diaw
zaza
baynes

2nd unit >>>>>>>........................

where is blair going no mention of him

^ blair = replacing splitter in starting line-up ........................................

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

blair

---

:lmao

:lol

From Gortat to Pachulia in about 2 hours. Gotta love free agency.

Seriously though, Pazuzu has no business coming anywhere near San Antonio. Would be a completely useless addition.

there's a saying where i come from:

"You can't get punk'd by a guy named Zaza"

I just vomited

I know there will be a lot of rumors but it's sad when you go from Ellis, AK47, Gortat to Pachulia and Lucas.

No reason for considering either of these dinosaurs.

Unless the Spurs are going to be short of cash and players soon cause they'll be trading cash and players soon for seriously paid talent incoming...

:stirpot:

No to both. Low cost, low quality moves.

I'm tired of the cheap shit. I know the Spurs have a huge operating income. Time to stop pretending they don't have the money when they clearly do.

They'd both be solid additions to the summer league squad.

Wouldn't be surprised if this is what the Spurs end up with. SA's front office has always been terrible when it comes to FAs and trades. Poor Duncan - all-time great cursed with a mentally weak coach and soft Euros for his second and third options. Old DRob was the only great player he ever played with.

If they can trade Splitter for Gortat's $7.7m, sign Kirilenko for $7m, and re-sign Ginobili for $4m they'd be down to minimum salary guys. Makes sense they'd look at getting guys like Zaza or Oden cheap to fill out the end of the roster. Lucas to a much lesser degree. They'd need a min salary guard or 2 but I'd rather audition summer league guys than sign Lucas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

How many teams did you build in the NBA?

---

wow from gortat and monta ellis to pachulia and lucas ....talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel

Hell no! Pass!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by timvp

Tbh, I'd rather just give Baynes a chance rather than pay Pachulia any type of money. He'll be on the wrong side of 30 soon and there's no guarantee he'll make it back from the Achilles injury. He has a lot of beef to carry around on a wonky tendon.

JL3 ........................... um ............... err................. well, I guess as a training camp invite, the Spurs could do worse. But even then, unless the Spurs start trading away their point guards, I don't see how he even makes sense as a training camp invite.

---

Exactly right on both counts.

Lucas is undersized, meaning the Spurs are infatuated