NBA owner's worth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

Wanna bet on that?

---

Maybe 30 percent?

I know in 2008 he owned less than 30 percent and I doubt that has changed significantly. The ownership group is a mix of individuals and corporations, and he serves as the chairman of the group. Unless, he's been buying people out like crazy, he owns much less than half of the franchise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by from back then

The Spurs ownership group currently has nineteen investors and are members of a limited liability company known as San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C.

The ownership group has a seven-person governing and decision-making body and Peter M. Holt serves as the Chairman of the group.

Listed below are the current members of San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C.: ARAMARK RBI, Inc., Raymond Joseph Barshick, Raul S. Cantu Trust, Richard Cantu Trust, Clear ChannelCommunications Inc., George C. Hixon, H.H. Sports, Ltd., IBC Capital Corporation, Sylvan Stephen Lang,James R. Leininger, Paul R. Markey, Jeanne Lang Mathews, R&B Partnership (Russell and Bruce Hill), David M. Robinson, Southwest Business Corporation, SBC Communications Inc., Felix L. Stehling, Valero Energy Corporation, Zachry Hospitality Corporation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kool Bob Love

Chump is the wreaking ball tbh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a5Ejb-4XAs

---

I'm sure he is your special wrecking ball, broke back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

Oh...so the poster that says Holt only owns 25% of the Spurs is not held accountable? You guys are to easy. LMAO. Holt has the least amount of money of any owner in the NBA. You posters dont know what you are talking about and I can school you all night long. Be a Spurs fans fan for decades instead of a Spurs fan faor 10 years. LMAO

---

I'm not saying anything about what Kori said. She's usually right and can certainly speak for herself.

I said that for YOUR sake. Holt may well own the biggest piece of the Spurs, but that would not make him majority owner. It's possible that 25 percent is literally the plurality share.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kori Ellis

Maybe 30 percent?

I know in 2008 he owned less than 30 percent and I doubt that has changed significantly. The ownership group is a mix of individuals and corporations, and he serves as the chairman of the group. Unless, he's been buying people out like crazy, he owns much less than half of the franchise.

---

Dont bet on that, Kori. He is easily the Spurs majority owner...by far.

I'm starting to feel more and more that people need to go through an application process to start threads in here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by benefactor

OP with some really bad bads in this thread.

---

Grey trying to bring enough bads to trick us into thinking they're goods. Gotta admire the effort on some level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

Dont bet on that, Kori. He is easily the Spurs majority owner...by far.

---

OK, here's a link saying he likely isn't a majority owner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Buck Harvey

Holt owns somewhere between 40 and 50 percent, so no one person has the power to make a deal.

---

http://www.expressnews.com/sports/co...rs-4566517.php

Where is your link saying he is the majority owner by far?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

Dont bet on that, Kori. He is easily the Spurs majority owner...by far.

---

I believe that he owns the biggest percentage of anyone, but you are acting like he owns 100 percent of the team. He doesn't.

I know that he originally had 13 percent of it when he bought in. I know that at one point he owned 40 percent of it, but I also know a few years back he only owned 30 percent of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

This isnt good for us, Spurs fans. Some of you may not remember when there were serious talks going on to move the Spurs to Kansas City...and luckily Robinson arrived and saved San Antonio. If this team starts to fade....same situation may arise.

---

Well, it remains to be seen how much risk there really is, after all:

San Antonio Spurs: North America's Best Run Professional Sports Franchise

http://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2...rts-franchise/

But hey, I'm sure Forbes magazine doesn't understand economics nearly as well as you do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kori Ellis

I believe that he owns the biggest percentage of anyone, but you are acting like he owns 100 percent of the team. He doesn't.

I know that he originally had 13 percent of it when he bought in. I know that at one point he owned 40 percent of it, but I also know a few years back he only owned 30 percent of it.

---

I tried explaining plurality ownership to him. But he didn't get it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

OK, here's a link saying he likely isn't a majority owner.



http://www.expressnews.com/sports/co...rs-4566517.php

Where is your link saying he is the majority owner by far?

---

That link is over a month old! What good is that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kori Ellis

I believe that he owns the biggest percentage of anyone, but you are acting like he owns 100 percent of the team. He doesn't.

I know that he originally had 13 percent of it when he bought in. I know that at one point he owned 40 percent of it, but I also know a few years back he only owned 30 percent of it.

---

So...are gonna finally back me up and say he owns the majority or not?

Tooo many truth bombs being drop on OP.

Men lie. Women lie. NUMBERS DONT!

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view3/149...-z-laugh-o.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

So...are gonna finally back me up and say he owns the majority or not?

---

No, she explicitly is not.

Where is your proof he is a majority owner "by far"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

No, she explicitly is not.

Where is your proof he is a majority owner "by far"?

---

She has the knowledge unlike you. She knows he owns the majority.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

She has the knowledge unlike you. She knows he owns the majority.

---

Prove he is a majority owner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Prove he is a majority owner.

---

prove he isnt.

One link. One goddamn link to an article stating that Holt owns more than 50% of the Spurs.

Is that too much to fucking ask?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

She has the knowledge unlike you. She knows he owns the majority.

---

Still no proof.:sleep

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

prove he isnt.

---

I just did.

Did you miss it?

One link to prove who owns more stock in the Spurs than Peter Holt...is that to much to ask?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

OK, here's a link saying he likely isn't a majority owner.



http://www.expressnews.com/sports/co...rs-4566517.php

Where is your link saying he is the majority owner by far?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

I just did.

Did you miss it?

---

I guess I did...show me who the majority owner of the Spurs is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

One link to prove who owns more stock in the Spurs than Peter Holt...is that to much to ask?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chinook

Majority owner isn't the same thing as plurality owner, by the way.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HemisfairArena

One link to prove who owns more stock in the Spurs than Peter Holt...is that to much to ask?

---

That isn't what you are arguing.

Seriously, do you know what "majority shareholder" means?

Please post your definition.