Since Evolution Is The Answer - Tell Me When Can I Expect To Grow My Wings And Fly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

I haven't observed fossilization but I accept it occurs.

---

Translation: until I see a fossil that proves me wrong.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps2cffac60.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Translation: until I see a fossil that proves me wrong.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps2cffac60.jpg

---

:lol

I have seen some fossils lately, and take my word for it, they should not have been behind the wheel of a car!

mouse puttin in work, :toast

The Truth is Science and all the TV shows you see like Discovery. TLC .and Natural Geographic are owned and produced by Atheist and they won't allow any new evidence that may contradict thier agendas.

In fact Discovery channel did a Show about dinosaurs and there was a man who discovered a Dinosaur print on top of a human print. And get this, the Discovery channel purposely edited that footage from the show. If you do the research the largest fossil museum in the world fired the director of the Museum for trying to introduce the fossil.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps77464b6d.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-AyDtD6sPA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Translation: until I see a fossil that proves me wrong.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps2cffac60.jpg

---

Did you see it fossilize? I see animals and humans every day. That doesn't prove they evolved.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

I see animals and humans every day. That doesn't prove they evolved.

---

Then how did they get here?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ion/foot87.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Then how did they get here?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ion/foot87.jpg

---

That's a question for another thread. The fact they exist and you did not seem them fossilize means you don't have to see it happen to conclude it did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

That's a question for another thread.

---

post a link to that "thread"

Quote:

---

The fact they exist and you did not seem them fossilize means you don't have to see it happen to conclude it did.

---

and what "thread" is that reply approved for?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

post a link to that "thread"

---

You'll have to start that one.

Quote:

---

and what "thread" is that reply approved for?

---

This one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robdiaz2191

mouse puttin in work, :toast

---

I see you have given up.

Sad.

Not really, I'm still looking for proof but have yet to find any.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Translation: until I see a fossil that proves me wrong.


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps2cffac60.jpg

---

um.. that isn't a fossil. You know that right?

It is also a really, really bad fake.

Shockingly enough the guy who found it is now trying to sell it, and creationists are falling all over themselves trying to buy it and play it up.

How exactly does this fossil speak to the genetic phylogeny we have developed after sequencing the genes of various creatures today?

In your own words, please.

i don't think wings would help (considering your weight)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robdiaz2191

Not really, I'm still looking for proof but have yet to find any.

---

What kind of proof are you looking for?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

What kind of proof are you looking for?

---

Bible verses :lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ

http://www.answersingenesis.org/about/faith

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by creationist statement of faith

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

---

They cannot, by definition, accept any evidence that contradicts their worldview.

That is not what anyone would call an "open" mind, is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robdiaz2191

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ

---

Not watching it.

You won't watch what I post.

Put it in your own words.

:lmao

At this point, I am more concerned with devolution tbh.

We could go back and forth all day posting yootoobs. I generally don't find that productive, especially since people who think that the theory of evolution is some evil conspiracy tend to not watch material that contradicts their world view.

Quote:

---

Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias) is a tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses.[Note 1][1] People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. They also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
A series of experiments in the 1960s suggested that people are biased toward confirming their existing beliefs. Later work re-interpreted these results as a tendency to test ideas in a one-sided way, focusing on one possibility and ignoring alternatives. In certain situations, this tendency can bias people's conclusions. Explanations for the observed biases include wishful thinking and the limited human capacity to process information. Another explanation is that people show confirmation bias because they are weighing up the costs of being wrong, rather than investigating in a neutral, scientific way.
Confirmation biases contribute to overconfidence in personal beliefs and can maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Poor decisions due to these biases have been found in political and organizational contexts.

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

This is the reason why you do not actually look at the evidence supporting evolution, nor do you bother watching or really reading anything I post.

Doesn't it bother you that you have been lied to so consistently and purposefully?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robdiaz2191

:lmao

---

???


I have already watched enough creationist lies to be familiar with them, and am not inclined to spend my time watching something when the favor is not returned.

If you actually watched what I posted on a minute for minute basis, I would be happy to entertain however much you want to post.

Quid pro quo.

No my friend, it is you who has been lied to. I have watched all of your links and have yet to find any proof that we evolved from fish.

tadpoles, yo.