Spurs Record After Winning Game 1's in the Tim Duncan Era

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones

Just the numbers...not a prediction of any sort.

Your comment doesn't even make sense..."applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled." What is that?

The Spurs won game 1...that's the only "assumption that's fulfilled." You sound like a retard.

My advice to you would be to say "we can't predict the future based on past history." At least then you wouldn't sound like an idiot.

---

:lmao

They may have won 1 but we lost the 6. :cry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lil'mo

:lmao

---

Let's start a new stat. What's the spurs record after jars mesh set calls lil'mo a faggot. Stay tuned :lmao

Statistics is a fucking joke. It's a practice of making up numbers to say anything you want them to. :Rollin

Fake math :lol

I thought we always lost a series after losing game 3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KaiRMD1

I thought we always lost a series after losing game 3

---

So which stat/trend was applicable against dallas? The one that says we win 90%+ of our series after winning game 1, or the one that says we lose 90% of our series after losing game 3?

(That's a rhetorical question)

Advanced stats have shown that when the spurs win 4 games they always win the series

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jARS mEsH sEt

(That's a rhetorical question)

---

Stats are useless, fag

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lil'mo

Statistics is a fucking joke. It's a practice of making up numbers to say anything you want them to. :Rollin

Fake math :lol

---

Jars is probably retarded. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally retarded.

FOUR RINGS FAGGOT

The last game 1 loss was the friggen Grizzlies? How spoiled we are...

fuck it ... we lost against OKC being up 2-0 and against Miami having a 1-0 ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jARS mEsH sEt

These stats are completely useless because the applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled.

---

They actually come into play as how well the Spurs as a unit close out series and hang on to series leads. But I think the main factor is Duncan and Co. are no spring chickens anymore. But Kawhi, Splitter, Green, Beli, Mills, now Baynes kinda negate the age factor a bit for the Spurs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by _JaG

Jars is probably retarded. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally retarded.

---

Because I have a grasp on statistics, I know they are a fucking joke :lol

Hey I can take any set of random data I want to make any argument I want! :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lil'mo

Because I have a grasp on statistics, I know they are a fucking joke :lol

Hey I can take any set of random data I want to make any argument I want! :lmao

---

Becaush I took a stats class once. Shutdahellup. Stupid full of themself youngsters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones

Just the numbers...not a prediction of any sort.

Your comment doesn't even make sense..."applicability of these stats in predicting future outcomes are based on assumptions that aren't fulfilled." What is that?

The Spurs won game 1...that's the only "assumption that's fulfilled." You sound like a retard.

My advice to you would be to say "we can't predict the future based on past history." At least then you wouldn't sound like an idiot.

---

He's not even sure what he's saying sometimes..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by _JaG

Jars is probably retarded. But anyone who says statistics is a joke, because he isn't smart enough to grasp statistics, is equally retarded.

---

:lmao Jag with the usual high horse bullshit without contributing anything meaningful to the thread. How does it feel to be a non-contributing zero?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spur|n|Austin

He's not even sure what he's saying sometimes..

---

:rollin so...fucking...mad. I love it.

Mad at? :lol I think it's fun watching you troll around here with shit takes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hater

We got a black hawk down, we got a black hawk down! Super 61 is down. We got a bird down in the city!!

:lol

---

"Shughart and Gordon requesting permission to go in and secure the crash site."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones

The Spurs have won 29 opening games in playoff series since Tim Duncan's arrival. Of those 29 series with game 1 victories they've gone on to win the series a total of 25 times (86%). However, their record in games 2s after a game 1 win is only 20-9, so based on that 86% series winning percentage it would appear that the Spurs let off the gas a bit in game 2 winning only 69% of those games.

If the Spurs go up 2-0, they own a 18-2 record in those series in the Duncan era (90%).

---

totally irrelevant since every variable has changed except for Pop and Tim. They have changed, too. Gotten older. So forecasting is impossible.