:lmao you are one stupid fuck if you think we won't need Tony for the WCF :lol
dummy :lol :rollin
Printable View
at this point I'd rather have Tony anyday and Manu pulled out for the rest of the playoffs.
And when Tony returns and runs the same ball handler oriented offense he will call Parker a ball hog for not giving Sugar enough touches.
You mean the Parker who has a career average of 19 ppg on 46%FG and 5 assists.?
Or the The Parker who has averaged better than 20 ppg in 7 post seasons ?
-the Parker that carried us in '07?
-or the playoff Parker that has carried up to 3 straight WCFs?
Please clarify which typical Parker shows up because Parker has been excellent in the playoffs.
Bros, I bet half of ST won't even watch the WCF without Parker tbh.
Nah, I'm talking about the Parker who has a career average .517 TS% in his playoff career. Shitty numbers considering his regular season percentage hover around .551 TS.
Iverson averaged 25 ppg in 7 post seasons. Doesn't make him a good player though.
PER in 2007 Playoffs:
26.1 - Duncan
24.1 - Ginobili
21.4 - Parker
Win shares in 2007 playoffs:
13.0 - Duncan
10.6 - Ginobili
9.6 - Parker
:lol at thinking Parker carried us in 2007. Frenchie wasn't even the second best player on that team. He won the Finals MVP because he was guarded by Boobie Gibson and beasted on one of the worst Finals teams of all-time. It was Duncan and Manu that carried us against the real competition that year.
And failed to show up in the crucial games that would win us a championship.
Yeah right. Parker has been unable to maintain his efficiency from regular season to post-season. Duncan did in his prime. So did Manu. Prime Parker falls pretty short compared to those two. It's no coincidence that the Spurs stopped winning titles after 2007(when TD and Manu began to decline). Parker ball hasn't won us shit.