Super Quick Grades: Game 1 Western Conference Finals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EVAY

I didn't agree with a lot of the grades.

I watched the game last night from my couch without getting on ptr or st because if things went south I didn't want to end up defending great players from idiots on game threads who couldn't find their asses with both hands. I actually enjoyed the game.

Not surprising that Parker got only a B grade (I forget if it had a + or - associated with it), given who was giving out the grades, but it is a travesty nonetheless. How can Parker get respect from the rest of the league when he gets so little from Spurs fans! Parker only took 12 shots, shot 50% from the field and had 12 assists with 1 turnover and he gets a B! What crap. Had he taken 20 shots people would be carping about that. Had he had a fair number of turnovers, people would be carping about that. If he made less than half his shots, people would be carping about that.

Parker outplayed Westbrook by a large margin when you take the entire game into account, and he did it with a strained hammy.

Manu had a really good game as well, and IIRC, only had one turnover.

I'm so glad that the Spurs won. They played beautifully!!

---

I love how the OP talks about Parker not passing the ball, then ignores that he had 12 assists.

Tony deserves an A, not the B- the OP gave him. :lol

Giving Timmy a B- is also a travesty. Does the OP think we win without Timmy's dominant offensive performance? Sure, he had the matchup advantage much of the game, but still.

And then the OP has the gall to give Manu a C, who scored crucial baskets in the third quarter when things were heading south and had 18 second-half points, including several in the fourth quarter that put the game out of reach.

I mean... :lol :lol :lol

But Kawhi got an A+, of course... Kawhi could put up a 4 points, 2 rebounds, 2-16 FG line and probably get an A- from the OP, tbqh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

:lol

At Manu deserving a B just because the spurs blew out the thunder

---

He hit some big shots in the 4th. I believe he hit a pair of 3's that helped bury the Refs.

This grades are pure bullshit.
OP is bullshit, tbh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cd021

He hit some big shots in the 4th. I believe he hit a pair of 3's that helped bury the Refs.

---

So we judge the game based on what he did for 5 minutes and what Duncan did on the offensive end in the first half?

It's gotta be about the totatalliy of the game..

Makes me sad how people expected a Grade A for Duncan when he was awful defensively. I specifically said Manu saved our ass in the third, but hey I guess in a game grade we should just forgot the awful things he did in the game.

I said Tony was phenomnal assisting the ball in the first quarter..I don't understand why we get so many butthurt people. He got 3 in the second half total.

Serious bias in several of these grades.

Tim, Tony, & Manu - too low, especially Manu.

K & Verde - tad too high.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

So we judge the game based on what he did for 5 minutes and what Duncan did on the offensive end in the first half?

It's gotta be about the totatalliy of the game..

Makes me sad how people expected a Grade A for Duncan when he was awful defensively. I specifically said Manu saved our ass in the third, but hey I guess in a game grade we should just forgot the awful things he did in the game.

I said Tony was phenomnal assisting the ball in the first quarter..I don't understand why we get so many butthurt people. He got 3 in the second half total.

---

If those 5 minutes help slam the door then that certainly affects his grade.

Not every player is going to be absolutely flawless for 20 or 30 minutes. If he comes up big in money time then it certainly should bump their grade.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cd021

If those 5 minutes help slam the door then that certainly affects his grade.

Not every player is going to be absolutely flawless for 20 or 30 minutes. If he comes up big in money time then it certainly should bump their grade.

---

Sure, but are we suppose to give a player an A if he scored 5 points in the last minute but was part of the reason why the game was even close to begin with? NO..

Manu was on his way to get a D..He had an awesome third so he got a C..Tony was on his way to get an A, he was bad in the second half so he got a B..Duncan was on his way to get an A, but he was bad in the second half so get a B.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

5. Danny Green - This nigga is the real deal tbh. ]

---

Funniest shit I've ever read
Lol awesome

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

So we judge the game based on what he did for 5 minutes and what Duncan did on the offensive end in the first half?

It's gotta be about the totatalliy of the game..

Makes me sad how people expected a Grade A for Duncan when he was awful defensively. I specifically said Manu saved our ass in the third, but hey I guess in a game grade we should just forgot the awful things he did in the game.

I said Tony was phenomnal assisting the ball in the first quarter..I don't understand why we get so many butthurt people. He got 3 in the second half total.

---

You gave Baynes an A for 5 minutes of work. I'm sure there was a minute in the game where he didn't get a rebound, point , or assist. The point isn't to diminish Baynes, but maybe guys like Tim and Manu were called on to do different things at different points in the game. Give a grade on impact, not a missed shot or two in the first half or a failure to stop Durrant from hitting a pick and roll jumper on a possession.

too bad the trolls ran off the site owners when they started low-balling their private life. shame shame.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

So we judge the game based on what he did for 5 minutes and what Duncan did on the offensive end in the first half?

It's gotta be about the totatalliy of the game..

Makes me sad how people expected a Grade A for Duncan when he was awful defensively. I specifically said Manu saved our ass in the third, but hey I guess in a game grade we should just forgot the awful things he did in the game.

I said Tony was phenomnal assisting the ball in the first quarter..I don't understand why we get so many butthurt people. He got 3 in the second half total.

---

Wrong again.

Tony had 6 assists in the first half and six assists in the second half. He didn't score as much in the second half because, as he said, "It was what they were giving me…". In other words, he read the thunder defense perfectly, took fewer shots himself the Spurs didn't need him to score, and he got the ball to people who were scoring.

It was the perfect way to play the game for the pg.

:lol at arguing about grades

I'm cool with apo grades based on expectation not pure performance, that's why baynes can get a A for 5 mn knowing we don't expect anything from him and he did well in 5 mn.

Then after you can disagree with the comments

Awful grades, nice try tho.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brazil

:lol at arguing about grades

I'm cool with apo grades based on expectation not pure performance, that's why baynes can get a A for 5 mn knowing we don't expect anything from him and he did well in 5 mn.

Then after you can disagree with the comments

---

that's always how timvp's grades were set up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Diego20

Awful grades, nice try tho.

---

Argentinean fans not liking Manu's C tbh :lol

oh and yeah imo manu is not a C but a A+ based on expectations tbh fwiw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brazil

oh and yeah imo manu is not a C but a A+ based on expectations tbh fwiw

---

:lol there's a reason I don't do grades anymore

Kinda sad how low your expectations are for Kawhi if shooting 40% while allowing KD to shoot over 50% is as good as you think he can be...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

:lol there's a reason I don't do grades anymore

---

:lol