Printable View
Why do people think pop can't see Tony sucks? Is this fan fiction or a deeply held belief? Isn't it more likely that he's giving Parker ample time to work out his issues given that hes an all time great who deserves such respect. I mean maybe pop is dumb. He's got two good point guards, he could make the switch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny RIngo
Funny stuff coming from the dyke who gets a hard on for a 12/38 Chimprook performanceQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny RIngo
Do you know the diff between % and TS% you stupid fuck? :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
You threw Manu under the bus for that series. The chart shows that Duncan and Manu were pretty damn good (and highly efficient). TP took 38 more shots than Manu and still scored less per game. When you have two guys scoring on ridiculous efficiency(60 TS%) and another scoring at a piss poor 47% TS, it seems strange to blame the guy that actually played well.Quote:
Originally Posted by daslicer
And I was talking about the '04 Lakers when I mentioned TP taking more shots than TD. Frenchie took 22 more shots than Duncan over those six games and had a putrid series as far as efficiency goes(42 TS%).
I don't hate TP. I just find him to be incredibly frustrating to watch in the playoffs...turns into a chucker way too often, makes excuses, has problems running the offense, etcQuote:
Originally Posted by daslicer
Makes it even worse for WB you retard :lmao shot 1/10 from deep that game :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by dabom
Quit sounding like a used condom, and stick to defending YOUR shit takes :tu
:lol using FG%Quote:
Originally Posted by K...
And yeah, 47 TS% is BAD...that's Iverson-esque.
TS% stands for true shooting percentage you fucking moron. Not three point percentage.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny RIngo
why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny RIngo
True Shooting Percentage; the formula is PTS / (2 * TSA). True shooting percentage is a measure of shooting efficiency that takes into account field goals, 3-point field goals, and free throws. True Shooting Attempts; the formula is FGA + 0.44 * FTA.
Glossary | Basketball-Reference.com
www.basketball-reference.com/about/glossary.html
It looks like you picked at stat that punishes parker for things he wasn't asked to do in the offense.
Tony shoots 42%, he doesn't shoot any threes and shoots 75% from the line. What is the problem? He's the second option that year, third if Manu was playing. Ya'll are cherry picking stats to show things that just aren't there.
No shit numnuts, three point shots are a part of TS%... Chimpbrook shot 1/10 the game he gave you children in vs PHXQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny RIngo
Quit contradicting yourself. You go at a player for shooting bad, but dick ride another just because your midget crew does it
also his freethrows faggot. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
Quiet down downy. I'm talking to someone about stats... Don't make me bring up the thread where you couldn't understand how Kawhi was one of the shittiest drivers in the league... And you needed someone to explain to you what my stat meant :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by dabom
ITs revisionist fan history to suggest parker dictated manu's bench role.You pretend coaches and GMs can go back to 2006 and play Manu heavy minutes. Then the stats would look right to you. You can tell Manu to shoot more. But you can't change history and you look foolish trying to pin parker on sabotaging Manu's career.
Holy hell, i get it.Manu was better. Thank god TOny could eat so many minutes and not wear Manu into the ground.
words vs stats. You don't know the difference. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht
k.. you are beginning to be one of this sites worst posters of 2015 season. No one even replies to ur shitty takes. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by K...
Finally, agenda crew. Plz address the point guard argument in light of the various attempts to blame parkers playoff numbers for under performance.
This is one of the agenda's crews best most though out arguments! cmon.
Also if one of the short bus could try and answer the query. It's a legitimate basketball question. If you don't want to scroll up or haven't read the point guard thread in the NBA forum i can help you narrow the question and find the relevant sources.
DADOM I CAN"T HEAR YOU< I HAVE YOU ON IGNORE
but i looked at your comment and i accept your criticism, i am a pretty bad poster who has no e-crew nor knowledge of advanced stats. I did not watch the last game...lol. If you reject my role as an interlocutor or arbitrator of logic than so be it. But hey it's not like i haven't just asked the crew to talk basketball with me. They could.
:lmao The irony in this post.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
It's alright man. NPQuote:
Originally Posted by K...
Lots of Fe in ur diet man. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Hoops Czar
:lol :tu Mods should just do you a favor and end your e-life , tbh.. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by dabom
no really cmon, take a stab at it.....why does Harlem say point guards are all inefficient in the playoffs yet single out parker here? It doesn't make sense...can you spot the flaw in my logic?
Lets start here....which point guards elevated their performance in the playoffs. That would be a good start.
Dabom if you want to wait until your daddy gets here, just say so.
Bc Harlem is a troll. Nobody takes his threads serious besides Robdiaz, Lefty, and his Alt's :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by K...
Speedy Claxton and Patty Mills come to mind...Quote:
Originally Posted by K...