-
14 million per year..
For this garbage? Smh..one of the worst contracts in recent league history, tbh..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Why did Pop re-up him after a garbage playoffs showing and hobbled parker?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
Why did Pop re-up him after a garbage playoffs showing and hobbled parker?
:(loyalty:(
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr Bones
Surprising thread.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
How much do we also pay Cancernelli and CancerJo?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
For this garbage? Smh..one of the worst contracts in recent league history, tbh..
Don't worry, it's just until 2018.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Disgusting tbh. Best FO in the league but they still make retarded decisions regularly.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Maybe he'll sign up,for Lil' Dribblers camp this summer to work on his D.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cantthinkofanything
Don't worry, it's just until 2018.
:lmao
inb4 someone points out raw ppg. faggot.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cantthinkofanything
Maybe he'll sign up,for Lil' Dribblers camp this summer to work on his D.
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Maybe Phil Jackson or Vivek or Flip Saunders will take him:lol..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Couldn't resist huh??? Ya'll really blaming Parker??
-
Re: 14 million per year..
:lol at us scoffing at Laker fans for keeping Kobe but now we got our own version.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Dude is just shit. He isn't going to get better as he gets older. He needs to call it quits tbh.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
coachmac87
Couldn't resist huh??? Ya'll really blaming Parker??
Yeah, they're still trying.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
I can't even get joy out of making fun of him anymore. We all knew he was going to end up dooming the team this year and it looks like that time is near. What he's doing to the team is depressing af. :depressed
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Op, I told you man. Parker is way too old and his idea of aggression revolves around a TD two man game. NOLA, HOUSTON..all terrible first quarters with Parker doing his usual TD and TP PnR in the first..He never run a single loop set for himself..maybe he was tired. But that's where I wanted tony to take most of his shots. Rather, his aggression was a predictable two man game between him and TD that amounted to nothing.
I don't think this team will win this year. They will have to make major adjustments with how they move the ball next year..Last two years, TP has been the engine. Drive and open up lanes...but he looks so shitty now and manu is 38..
Pop needs to look at how Bud play's offense..Great ball movement but not as reliant with the drive. They use the post a lot to open up teammates in the weak side.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FkLA
I can't even get joy out of making fun of him anymore. We all knew he was going to end up dooming the team this year and it looks like that time is near. What he's doing to the team is depressing af. :depressed
We called it a long time ago, but I stopped saying anything negative about him the past few months..I gave him a chance, I showed confidence in him, I did what all these player fans wanted me to do, but the result was the same as it has always been..Playoff Parker the playoff choker..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
Yeah, they're still trying.
Obviously, many players played poorly, but how do you assess TP's performance on both ends tonight specifically?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Oh look, Apa_9 agrees with Mailk. Surprises abound.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DPG21920
Obviously, many players played poorly, but how do you assess TP's performance on both ends tonight specifically?
Not good, but not bad enough for the try hard krew to start all these threads and not talk about anything else.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apalisoc_9
Op, I told you man. Parker is way too old and his idea of aggression revolves around a TD two man game. NOLA, HOUSTON..all terrible first quarters with Parker doing his usual TD and TP PnR in the first..He never run a single loop set for himself..maybe he was tired. But that's where I wanted tony to take most of his shots. Rather, his aggression was a predictable two man game between him and TD that amounted to nothing.
I don't think this team will win this year. They will have to make major adjustments with how they move the ball next year..Last two years, TP has been the engine. Drive and open up lanes...but he looks so shitty now and manu is 38..
Pop needs to look at how Bud play's offense..Great ball movement but not as reliant with the drive. They use the post a lot to open up teammates in the weak side.
Parker was mediocre last year(not as bad as this year, though), too, but as you said, Manu was able to play the facilitator role perfectly, and Patty provided a nice change of pace..unfortunately, Manu doesn't have anything left for more than short stretches nowadays, nobody to mask Porky's deficiencies..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
Yeah, they're still trying.
they?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FuzzyLumpkins
they?
Yep, each member of the krew has to start his own thread.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apalisoc_9
Op, I told you man. Parker is way too old and his idea of aggression revolves around a TD two man game. NOLA, HOUSTON..all terrible first quarters with Parker doing his usual TD and TP PnR in the first..He never run a single loop set for himself..maybe he was tired. But that's where I wanted tony to take most of his shots. Rather, his aggression was a predictable two man game between him and TD that amounted to nothing.I don't think this team will win this year. They will have to make major adjustments with how they move the ball next year..Last two years, TP has been the engine. Drive and open up lanes...but he looks so shitty now and manu is 38..Pop needs to look at how Bud play's offense..Great ball movement but not as reliant with the drive. They use the post a lot to open up teammates in the weak side.
That winning streak gave us some hope but Pop and Rique aren't willing to give Kawhi the reins. The team dominated during the streak with a heavy dose of Kawhi post-ups and they've progressively been going away from that in favor of Rique's dribble dribble dribble or two man game.
cue the morons that respond with FGAs or lack of aggression
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FkLA
That winning streak gave us some hope but Pop and Rique aren't willing to give Kawhi the reins. The team dominated during the streak with a heavy dose of Kawhi post-ups and they've progressively been going away from that in favor of Rique's dribble dribble dribble or two man game.
Pray for Hope brah.
That's the only way this team wins this year...IMO.
kawhi was 7/12 tonight...But the team wasn't prepared with LA doubling Kawhi..They couldn't take advantage of the pass out.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
:hang
Not sure how anyone could thing signing an aging pg a year before his deal is even up is a good idea. Did they really think other teams would be all over him. Ugh. Another Rj-like contract. Another team cancer.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
Not good, but not bad enough for the try hard krew to start all these threads and not talk about anything else.
You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.
Honestly, did you watch the game?
Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
:depressed 45 million extension for the next three years.
And he'll most likely play for France this summer too just to rub it in the fan's faces. Most selfish player in Spurs history.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DMC
You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.
What would you like me to say?
Quote:
Honestly, did you watch the game?
I did.
Quote:
Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?
No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Parker was part of the problem tonight, along with Green, Leonard and Manu...
A lot less Cojo, more Patty Mills also.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
What would you like me to say?
I did.
No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?
Chump's takes are like black unicorns. Never seen one before. :lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DMC
You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.
Honestly, did you watch the game?
Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
Chump's takes are like black unicorns. Never seen one before. :lmao
What color unicorns do you see?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ditty
Parker was part of the problem tonight, along with Green, Leonard and Manu...
A lot less Cojo, more Patty Mills also.
:wtf
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
What would you like me to say?
I'll respond just this one time because I pinged you first, but I'm not going 3 pages with you and unlike you, I won't answer a question with a question.
I'd like you to give a technical basketball assessment on Tony's performance, what hindered him, what can be done about it. I'm not going to tell you what to say, but I'd like to see it fit that description of a response.
Then you should be able to give a better response. I don't want to get into the technical definition of "better".
Quote:
No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?
It was a rhetorical question, but you knew this already. Again, you feel the need to respond to every single statement.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
:wtf
Yes Manu was sloppy took some bad shots himself, and Leonard played a below average defense and offensive game.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DMC
You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.
Honestly, did you watch the game?
Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DMC
I'll respond just this one time because I pinged you first, but I'm not going 3 pages with you and unlike you, I won't answer a question with a question.
I'd like you to give a technical basketball assessment on Tony's performance, what hindered him, what can be done about it. I'm not going to tell you what to say, but I'd like to see it fit that description of a response.
My take was that other factors seemed to influence the game more than Parker's less than stellar play, which I mentioned. All the sudden you become the forum police you claim I want to be and list your demands on what you want from other people's takes. My take didn't satisfy you. Or DPG. Or the krew. Nice.
Quote:
Then you should be able to give a better response. I don't want to get into the technical definition of "better".
Why should it be "better"? -- it's not like any of us are professional basketball journalists, coaches or players. We're a bunch of dudes on a message board. Now it's all serious analysis for some reason after every single person who is trying to criticize me has trolled the shit out of this message board. That's rich.
Quote:
It was a rhetorical question, but you knew this already. Again, you feel the need to respond to every single statement.
You specifically asked for a response in this one. Let me know if you are serious about it.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
My take was that other factors seemed to influence the game more than Parker's less than stellar play, which I mentioned. All the sudden you become the forum police you claim I want to be and list your demands on what you want from other people's takes. My take didn't satisfy you. Or DPG. Or the krew. Nice.
1. "Other factors had more..." is not an assessment to Parker's play.
2. "Nuh uh, you are"
3. Demands.... you asked what I wanted.
Quote:
Why should it be "better"? -- it's not like any of us are professional basketball journalists, coaches or players. We're a bunch of dudes on a message board. Now it's all serious analysis for some reason after every single person who is trying to criticize me has trolled the shit out of this message board. That's rich.
Saying a lot but avoiding any basketball talk.
Quote:
You specifically asked for a response in this one. Let me know if you are serious about it.
You illustrated my point perfectly. Thanks for that.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
There's lots of blame to go around for yesterday's loss. Tony was bad, Tiago and Leonard were non-factors and Green was putrid. Props to Baynes for showing up and trying. Leonard has a ways to go on offense before he can be counted on to be a "go to" guy consistently. I'd rather he make his presence known on defense and rebound like a mad man.
Chris Paul and J.J. Redick got way too many open looks too. That's got to stop.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DMC
1. "Other factors had more..." is not an assessment to Parker's play.
2. "Nuh uh, you are"
3. Demands.... you asked what I wanted.
My assessment is as in depth and monumental as your "too late to do anything" assessment tbh. I don't know why your standards are suddenly higher for other people. Why is it OK for you and not me?
Quote:
Saying a lot but avoiding any basketball talk.
Talking basketball all along. You want to talk about me.
Quote:
You illustrated my point perfectly. Thanks for that.
And you did mine. Thanks for that.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs9
Change my name mods :cry
:lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
What color unicorns do you see?
Lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr Bones
Surprising thread.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
MVParker deserves a max for his contributions to this team tbh.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty
:lol Spurms FO
Going to look even worse for the Spurs front office when Parker chooses to play for France this summer.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs9
Change my name mods :cry
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Parker isn't even worth a third of that contract.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
What color unicorns do you see?
End thread. :lmao :rollin
-
Re: 14 million per year..
At least the cap is going to skyrocket in the next few years so this will be nothing by 2017, imo
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChumpDumper
My assessment is as in depth and monumental as your "too late to do anything" assessment tbh. I don't know why your standards are suddenly higher for other people. Why is it OK for you and not me?
You didn't ask me for my assessment. You specifically asked me what I wanted you to say and I specifically told you. If you want to play the "tu quoque" card, why ask?
Would you like my assessment?
Quote:
Talking basketball all along. You want to talk about me.
Actually no, you've made a side note about baskeball before returning to the passive aggressive responding techniques (that I am sure I do too and you'll let me know it promptly).
Quote:
And you did mine. Thanks for that.
Whatever anyone says goes for them as well, ergo nothing exists since everything is cancelled out. Soooo.... what's the issue?
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Meanwhile, Pablo Prigioni is getting paid 1.6 mil to provide the same impact and role, tbh..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
Meanwhile, Pablo Prigioni is getting paid 1.6 mil to provide the same impact and role, tbh..
That's insulting to Pablo tbh.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
That's insulting to Pablo tbh.
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
OMG.... :lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
This :lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
http://i.imgur.com/ic0ZMVx.gif
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Feels like this fat fuck is holding the team hostage...
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NASpurs
Feels like this fat fuck is holding the team hostage...
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
fuck my life :lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NASpurs
Feels like this fat fuck is holding the team hostage...
He must have some shit on Pop tbh. No way he would be playing going enrique on us if he didn't.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robdiaz2191
:lmao
:lol I wasn't even trying to be funny. It fucking bums me out thinking about it.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NASpurs
:lol I wasn't even trying to be funny. It fucking bums me out thinking about it.
Yeah, most of us feel the same way.:lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
That loyalty shit bit them on the ass.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
the worst part about TP's extension is that it hasn't even kicked in yet :lol
We'll know Brent's pain soon enough. Hope the parkerfans are happy fwiw.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HI-FI
We'll know Brent's pain soon enough. Hope the parkerfans are happy fwiw.
They still think we need more Enrique. :lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NASpurs
That loyalty shit bit them on the ass.
Yeah, sometimes playing that good trusty unconditional thing doesnt pay off, thats life.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
How much is JJ Barea getting paid, tbh? He's shredding the Rockets' defense..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
How much is JJ Barea getting paid, tbh? He's shredding the Rockets' defense..
Making $1.3 mil this year :lol
He's an UFA this summer.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
He's destroying them, and generating wide open looks for scrubs like Villanueva:lol..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
He's destroying them, and generating wide open looks for scrubs like Villanueva:lol..
I've always hated playing against him but he's a scrappy player who comes to play.. Made a pretty solid career for a guy who's 6'0 with limited athletic ability.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BatManu20
I've always hated playing against him but he's a scrappy player who comes to play.. Made a pretty solid career for a guy who's 6'0 with limited athletic ability.
No way he's 6', tbh, 5'9" at most:lol..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
I said yesterday, sign barea in the offseason..and figure out a way to get a defensive big.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Should Enrique try beisbol?
Fat, overpaid and barely moves
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty
Should Enrique try beisbol?
Fat, overpaid and barely moves
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty
Should Enrique try beisbol?
Fat, overpaid and barely moves
He'd have to be the designated hitter. He certainly can't field or pitch, because once he gets the ball in his hands, he's never giving it back.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
He'd have to be the designated hitter. He certainly can't field or pitch, because once he gets the ball in his hands, he's never giving it back.
:lmao
-
Re: 14 million per year..
$14 million per year gets you this come playoff time:
8.8 ppg/ 2.3 rpg/ 2.5 apg on 36 TS%
Meanwhile, look at what a true star point guard like Paul is doing in this series:
23.5 ppg/ 5.3 epg/ 6.0 apg/ 1.5 spg on 65 TS%
:lol at the myth that "Parker owns Paul"
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Johnny RIngo
$14 million per year gets you this come playoff time:
8.8 ppg/ 2.3 rpg/ 2.5 apg on 36 TS%
Meanwhile, look at what a true star point guard like Paul is doing in this series:
23.5 ppg/ 5.3 epg/ 6.0 apg/ 1.5 spg on 65 TS%
:lol at the myth that "Parker owns Paul"
Damn
-
Re: 14 million per year..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robdiaz2191
Damn
Going to look even worse for Enrique if he chooses to play for France after the piss poor playoffs he's having. It would be the ultimate slap to the face of all the fans. Dude is way out of shape, whines about non-stop injuries, can't make any type of shot with consistency anymore(Mid range, FT, three) and he's set to make $45 mil over the next three years. He should work on improving the many flaws in his game this summer and maybe recuperate/get in better shape. But you just know he's going to opt to play for France instead so he can boost his fragile ego after getting his shit pushed in by Chris Paul. Tony loves participating in these meaningless international comps where he can score easy buckets against unathletic Euros. It helps him forget about the playoff choking. Did the same thing in 2013 after getting outplayed by Mario Chalmers in game 6/7 of the Finals.
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Tim Duncan = Tall + fundamentals
Manu = Very tricky player
Parker = speed
TP will fall off much much sooner than Manu or Duncan
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Malik Hairston
Meanwhile, Pablo Prigioni is getting paid 1.6 mil to provide the same impact and role, tbh..
Can't believe I insulted Prigioni by comparing him to Porky, tbh..
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Lol at cp3 choke job max player lol
-
Re: 14 million per year..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ducks
Lol at cp3 choke job max player lol
Could you imagine how bad Spurstalk would be if we had a perennial choker like Paul? This guy is ridiculous. 10 years man, 10 frieking years.