14 million per year..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins

they?

---

Yep, each member of the krew has to start his own thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Op, I told you man. Parker is way too old and his idea of aggression revolves around a TD two man game. NOLA, HOUSTON..all terrible first quarters with Parker doing his usual TD and TP PnR in the first..He never run a single loop set for himself..maybe he was tired. But that's where I wanted tony to take most of his shots. Rather, his aggression was a predictable two man game between him and TD that amounted to nothing.I don't think this team will win this year. They will have to make major adjustments with how they move the ball next year..Last two years, TP has been the engine. Drive and open up lanes...but he looks so shitty now and manu is 38..Pop needs to look at how Bud play's offense..Great ball movement but not as reliant with the drive. They use the post a lot to open up teammates in the weak side.

---

That winning streak gave us some hope but Pop and Rique aren't willing to give Kawhi the reins. The team dominated during the streak with a heavy dose of Kawhi post-ups and they've progressively been going away from that in favor of Rique's dribble dribble dribble or two man game.

cue the morons that respond with FGAs or lack of aggression

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FkLA

That winning streak gave us some hope but Pop and Rique aren't willing to give Kawhi the reins. The team dominated during the streak with a heavy dose of Kawhi post-ups and they've progressively been going away from that in favor of Rique's dribble dribble dribble or two man game.

---

Pray for Hope brah.

That's the only way this team wins this year...IMO.

kawhi was 7/12 tonight...But the team wasn't prepared with LA doubling Kawhi..They couldn't take advantage of the pass out.

:hang

Not sure how anyone could thing signing an aging pg a year before his deal is even up is a good idea. Did they really think other teams would be all over him. Ugh. Another Rj-like contract. Another team cancer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Not good, but not bad enough for the try hard krew to start all these threads and not talk about anything else.

---

You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.

Honestly, did you watch the game?

Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?

:depressed 45 million extension for the next three years.

And he'll most likely play for France this summer too just to rub it in the fan's faces. Most selfish player in Spurs history.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.

---

What would you like me to say?

Quote:

---

Honestly, did you watch the game?

---

I did.

Quote:

---

Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?

---

No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?

Parker was part of the problem tonight, along with Green, Leonard and Manu...

A lot less Cojo, more Patty Mills also.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

What would you like me to say?

I did.

No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?

---

Chump's takes are like black unicorns. Never seen one before. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.

Honestly, did you watch the game?

Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

Chump's takes are like black unicorns. Never seen one before. :lmao

---

What color unicorns do you see?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ditty

Parker was part of the problem tonight, along with Green, Leonard and Manu...

A lot less Cojo, more Patty Mills also.

---

:wtf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

What would you like me to say?

---

I'll respond just this one time because I pinged you first, but I'm not going 3 pages with you and unlike you, I won't answer a question with a question.

I'd like you to give a technical basketball assessment on Tony's performance, what hindered him, what can be done about it. I'm not going to tell you what to say, but I'd like to see it fit that description of a response.

Quote:

---

I did.

---

Then you should be able to give a better response. I don't want to get into the technical definition of "better".

Quote:

---

No. It's not a physical button. Is yours?

---

It was a rhetorical question, but you knew this already. Again, you feel the need to respond to every single statement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

:wtf

---

Yes Manu was sloppy took some bad shots himself, and Leonard played a below average defense and offensive game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

You seem intent on being the forum police. I wonder if you even watched the game. You're asked time and again for your take and you don't seem to have one. "Not good, but not bad enough for..." is not an assessment. Anyone could gather from the thread topic that it wasn't good.

Honestly, did you watch the game?

Another question: Does your "reply" button on your screen ever need to be replaced?

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

I'll respond just this one time because I pinged you first, but I'm not going 3 pages with you and unlike you, I won't answer a question with a question.

I'd like you to give a technical basketball assessment on Tony's performance, what hindered him, what can be done about it. I'm not going to tell you what to say, but I'd like to see it fit that description of a response.

---

My take was that other factors seemed to influence the game more than Parker's less than stellar play, which I mentioned. All the sudden you become the forum police you claim I want to be and list your demands on what you want from other people's takes. My take didn't satisfy you. Or DPG. Or the krew. Nice.

Quote:

---

Then you should be able to give a better response. I don't want to get into the technical definition of "better".

---

Why should it be "better"? -- it's not like any of us are professional basketball journalists, coaches or players. We're a bunch of dudes on a message board. Now it's all serious analysis for some reason after every single person who is trying to criticize me has trolled the shit out of this message board. That's rich.

Quote:

---

It was a rhetorical question, but you knew this already. Again, you feel the need to respond to every single statement.

---

You specifically asked for a response in this one. Let me know if you are serious about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

My take was that other factors seemed to influence the game more than Parker's less than stellar play, which I mentioned. All the sudden you become the forum police you claim I want to be and list your demands on what you want from other people's takes. My take didn't satisfy you. Or DPG. Or the krew. Nice.

---

1. "Other factors had more..." is not an assessment to Parker's play.
2. "Nuh uh, you are"
3. Demands.... you asked what I wanted.

Quote:

---

Why should it be "better"? -- it's not like any of us are professional basketball journalists, coaches or players. We're a bunch of dudes on a message board. Now it's all serious analysis for some reason after every single person who is trying to criticize me has trolled the shit out of this message board. That's rich.

---

Saying a lot but avoiding any basketball talk.

Quote:

---

You specifically asked for a response in this one. Let me know if you are serious about it.

---

You illustrated my point perfectly. Thanks for that.

Change my name mods :cry

There's lots of blame to go around for yesterday's loss. Tony was bad, Tiago and Leonard were non-factors and Green was putrid. Props to Baynes for showing up and trying. Leonard has a ways to go on offense before he can be counted on to be a "go to" guy consistently. I'd rather he make his presence known on defense and rebound like a mad man.

Chris Paul and J.J. Redick got way too many open looks too. That's got to stop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

1. "Other factors had more..." is not an assessment to Parker's play.
2. "Nuh uh, you are"
3. Demands.... you asked what I wanted.

---

My assessment is as in depth and monumental as your "too late to do anything" assessment tbh. I don't know why your standards are suddenly higher for other people. Why is it OK for you and not me?

Quote:

---

Saying a lot but avoiding any basketball talk.

---

Talking basketball all along. You want to talk about me.

Quote:

---

You illustrated my point perfectly. Thanks for that.

---

And you did mine. Thanks for that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs9

Change my name mods :cry

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

What color unicorns do you see?

---

Lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Bones

Surprising thread.

---

MVParker deserves a max for his contributions to this team tbh.

:lol Spurms FO