-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Kawhi on Redick has been working extremely well for us this series. Redick is an underrated aspect of their offense (3rd most important player on offense behind CP3/Blake). He averaged over 16 ppg on 62.2 TS% in the regular season, which is fantastic for a role player. In the first 2 games we held him to 13 ppg on 47.8 TS%. One of Redick's biggest strengths is moving without the ball and getting open looks - with Kawhi suffocating him, it makes it extremely difficult for him to utilize that part of his game. Even if he does break free and get separation, Kawhi has the length to recover and still affect the shot.
If we shut down everyone outside CP3/Blake, it'll be very hard for them to win. As great as those guys are, they aren't like KD/Westbrook (and even those 2 struggled to carry the team in last year's WCF).
I think Pop had the right idea in Game 2. He waited until the 2nd half to start using Green/Kawhi on CP3. Two benefits of doing this:
1) Guarding CP3 for an entire game is extremely tiring and would require a ton of energy. Waiting until the 2nd half to really put the clamps on him saves some energy from Green/Kawhi.
2) Since CP3 is having to play such heavy minutes, it's reasonable to expect he'll be experiencing fatigue by the 4th quarter. When that fatigue starts to set in, and THEN you throw an elite defender like Green or Kawhi on him (who aren't as fatigued since they weren't having to guard him so much in the 1st half, and because they actually get rest throughout the game), that really makes things difficult for him.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Thanks for this info....trust Pop to know how to play this. Tony did provide good ball handling in the first 3 quarters of game 2 which might not be reflected in his Per. He scored 1 point, so of course his Per is what it is...
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
let him keep shooting. for his career, he's a 41% shooter from the field. for the season, he's been at 39.6%
he was 4-13 in game 2 (31%). the more he shoots, thats less looks for Paul/Griffin. if he's going to make a bunch of fluke shots in a row, we're going to live with it
This. And avoid fouling him. Much rather have him taking tough jump shots than Paul or Griffin getting looks.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
The numbers really bear out the depth issues and highlight that, for all of the adjustments and match ups, the series really comes down to whether the Spurs can punish the Clippers when Paul and Griffin sit and force the Clippers to play uphill, particularly in the second and fourth quarters.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apalisoc_9
You don't put kawhi on any of the best players the first two quarters. You're risking offense.
Unless, they have two or three superstars..you hide him then have them defend on the fourth..
it seems pretty obvious...Pop has done this multiple times..The only time you see kawhi against the best offensive perimeter player is in the fourth or if there is two or three superstars in the opposing team.
Kawhi is not a defense only kinda player anymore..he's averaging 21ppg this series.
It actually appears Pop is rotating defenders every trip on defense. I think he is trying to give Paul different looks so he can't get used to how he is being defended.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cd98
It actually appears Pop is rotating defenders every trip on defense. I think he is trying to give Paul different looks so he can't get used to how he is being defended.
sure...
but you're not going to stick kawhi on someone unless it's the fourth or it's a team with more than 2 offensive stars...Pop has been doing this since Kawhi had to carry offensive load..in his 2nd and part of his 3rd year it was different..
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FromWayDowntown
The numbers really bear out the depth issues and highlight that, for all of the adjustments and match ups, the series really comes down to whether the Spurs can punish the Clippers when Paul and Griffin sit and force the Clippers to play uphill, particularly in the second and fourth quarters.
Yup. The Clippers had one of the best starting lineups in the league this year. Unless the Spurs play out of their minds or LAC's starters drop a complete dud, it's unlikely that we'll build a big lead when both starting units are playing against each other. The key should be staying even when their starters are playing, and then building a lead once the bench comes in.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robdiaz2191
crawford is playing well. any ideas on how to slow him down?
actually, i think he has a lot of room to improve, more than anyone for the clippers
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SpursFan86
Yup. The Clippers had one of the best starting lineups in the league this year. Unless the Spurs play out of their minds or LAC's starters drop a complete dud, it's unlikely that we'll build a big lead when both starting units are playing against each other. The key should be staying even when their starters are playing, and then building a lead once the bench comes in.
That's the ideal. Alternatively, it might be useful to force Doc to play his starters big minutes in stressful situations, particularly if this series is going to go long and even more particularly with the quick turnaround from Game 3 to Game 4.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FromWayDowntown
The numbers really bear out the depth issues and highlight that, for all of the adjustments and match ups, the series really comes down to whether the Spurs can punish the Clippers when Paul and Griffin sit and force the Clippers to play uphill, particularly in the second and fourth quarters.
I think a lot of ado has been made about the Spurs age and the fatigue factor, but Pop has done a masterful job, not just throughout the season, but also in this series to manage minutes whenever he could.
A cursory look at minutes played for both teams bears that out. As the series progresses, all those extra minutes start to add up, and while the Clippers are young, I think fatigue on their side could end up being a factor.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robdiaz2191
crawford is playing well. any ideas on how to slow him down?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
let him keep shooting. for his career, he's a 41% shooter from the field. for the season, he's been at 39.6%
he was 4-13 in game 2 (31%). the more he shoots, thats less looks for Paul/Griffin. if he's going to make a bunch of fluke shots in a row, we're going to live with it
:hat
:wakeup
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
:lmao Crawford beng #3 just how bad this stat is :lol
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Sorry, but TP's PER is :lol
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DPG21920
Sorry, but TP's PER is :lol
:lol he just needs to survive this series..should be much easier against Houston's terrible PGs..
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Updated with Bonner, who has now played 25 mins.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Feel free to add your own notes, tbh
Sometimes it’s so easy to bug a neg. There’s no challenge to it. But since every faggot deserves the fatal fuk, it’s my duty to oblige. I was at an AIDS benefit, and this young bartender kept giving me the eye. I figured if he wanted me to dick him, I’d accommodate. So I started a conversation, and hinted I’d go home with him if he wanted. He got this look of lust in his eyes, and I knew I had a taker. He said be off in an hour, so I waited around in anticipation of shooting a killer load up his ass. I had his clothes off in no time. He had a good body and a nice dick, but it was his ass I was interested in. The easiest way to get into a faggot’s ass is to rim it, so I went to work on him. I had his legs in the air in no time. I spit on my dick, aligned it with his hole, and thrust my weapon inside his guts. He gasped, urging me to go slow, cause he hadn’t been fukked in a while. That turned me on, so I started to power-fuk him. I had one objective in mind—to blow a huge load of deadly cum deep inside his guts. He kept stroking, and I pulled his hand off and told him not yet. He told me that most guys who screwed him came in a couple minutes. I said that I had no intention of making this QUICK (which was true) and DIRTY–which was not. I started to really plow his ass. I wanted to tear him up a bit. After10 minutes, I was ready for the kill. I asked him where he wanted it. He said to shoot all over him, but NOT INSIDE. That made me smile, knowing he wanted to stay NEG but was taking my poz dick up his ass. “TOO LATE!” I said. He tensed in a last ditch effort to reject me. I shot what felt like a gallon of POZ jizz up his NEG ass. He went limp, accepting the inevitable. I kept fukking him, massaging my cum into his gut. He started stroking his pole again, and I let him. I flipped him onto his stomach, and slid my dick, slick with poz cum, back inside him. I started pumping again, and 20 minutes later shot my 2nd load of poison. I glanced at my watch. I’d fukked him for half an hour so far. My dick came out pink–cum mixed with blood. I pictured my virus entering his bloodstream, which made me hard again. I told him I needed to dick him some more. The grimace on his face told me he was getting pretty sore. But my needs came first, and I rode his neg ass for what seemed like an eternity (but was only 30 minutes). I finally shot my 3rd load. His hand went back to his pole, and I let him cum. I figured he deserved that much. He shot all over his chest—hopefully the last NEG load of his life. As I dressed, he told me he’d never been fukked him like that before, and that it’d been the best sex of his life. I agreed, but not for the reasons he was thinking. I told him to relax, that I’d get the door myself. I locked it behind me. I left him there naked, covered with his own cum, my deadly bug taking over his body. Not bad for an hour’s work.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeebus
Sometimes it’s so easy to bug a neg. There’s no challenge to it. But since every faggot deserves the fatal fuk, it’s my duty to oblige. I was at an AIDS benefit, and this young bartender kept giving me the eye. I figured if he wanted me to dick him, I’d accommodate. So I started a conversation, and hinted I’d go home with him if he wanted. He got this look of lust in his eyes, and I knew I had a taker. He said be off in an hour, so I waited around in anticipation of shooting a killer load up his ass. I had his clothes off in no time. He had a good body and a nice dick, but it was his ass I was interested in. The easiest way to get into a faggot’s ass is to rim it, so I went to work on him. I had his legs in the air in no time. I spit on my dick, aligned it with his hole, and thrust my weapon inside his guts. He gasped, urging me to go slow, cause he hadn’t been fukked in a while. That turned me on, so I started to power-fuk him. I had one objective in mind—to blow a huge load of deadly cum deep inside his guts. He kept stroking, and I pulled his hand off and told him not yet. He told me that most guys who screwed him came in a couple minutes. I said that I had no intention of making this QUICK (which was true) and DIRTY–which was not. I started to really plow his ass. I wanted to tear him up a bit. After10 minutes, I was ready for the kill. I asked him where he wanted it. He said to shoot all over him, but NOT INSIDE. That made me smile, knowing he wanted to stay NEG but was taking my poz dick up his ass. “TOO LATE!” I said. He tensed in a last ditch effort to reject me. I shot what felt like a gallon of POZ jizz up his NEG ass. He went limp, accepting the inevitable. I kept fukking him, massaging my cum into his gut. He started stroking his pole again, and I let him. I flipped him onto his stomach, and slid my dick, slick with poz cum, back inside him. I started pumping again, and 20 minutes later shot my 2nd load of poison. I glanced at my watch. I’d fukked him for half an hour so far. My dick came out pink–cum mixed with blood. I pictured my virus entering his bloodstream, which made me hard again. I told him I needed to dick him some more. The grimace on his face told me he was getting pretty sore. But my needs came first, and I rode his neg ass for what seemed like an eternity (but was only 30 minutes). I finally shot my 3rd load. His hand went back to his pole, and I let him cum. I figured he deserved that much. He shot all over his chest—hopefully the last NEG load of his life. As I dressed, he told me he’d never been fukked him like that before, and that it’d been the best sex of his life. I agreed, but not for the reasons he was thinking. I told him to relax, that I’d get the door myself. I locked it behind me. I left him there naked, covered with his own cum, my deadly bug taking over his body. Not bad for an hour’s work.
So... what I gathered from this is that Parker sucks. :lol
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Tony Parker: 0.7 (84)
http://rawreplaymedia.com/media/2013...s_130703c1.gif
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FkLA
:lmao..
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Reminds me of timvp's game grades...
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robdiaz2191
1.8:lol
That is why you can't always judge performance through numbers. Tony had a solid game and kept the defense honest with his heavy penetration and aggressive ball movement. I was very happy with his game last night despite his shooting percentage.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
elbamba
That is why you can't always judge performance through numbers. Tony had a solid game and kept the defense honest with his heavy penetration and aggressive ball movement. I was very happy with his game last night despite his shooting percentage.
Yeah, this is only a partial picture. A ranking that includes defense too or playmaking would have both Danny and Tony higher...
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
elbamba
That is why you can't always judge performance through numbers. Tony had a solid game and kept the defense honest with his heavy penetration and aggressive ball movement. I was very happy with his game last night despite his shooting percentage.
Crofl. Yeah, you keep telling yourself that buddy.
-
Re: Spurs Offense so far (PER)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
elbamba
That is why you can't always judge performance through numbers. Tony had a solid game and kept the defense honest with his heavy penetration and aggressive ball movement. I was very happy with his game last night despite his shooting percentage.
:lmao