-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
What sucks is if Tony does have another season like last year, we still won't be able to deal him b/c nobody in their right mind will take on that contract. We just really need him to bounce back, tbh.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Almost any team with a better starter has a better pg situation than us. Parker isn't top ten so there are quite a bit of teams ahead of us.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Our PG rotation sucks, honestly. But we don't need dominant PGs with our current lineup. If Parker loses the extra weight and regains his jump shot, we'll be okay. And with Ginobili and/or Diaw in the second unit, Patty doesn't need to be the playmaker.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
I'd say slightly above average. Parker has mega corporate knowledge that'd make Westbrook head explode.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K...
I'd say slightly above average. Parker has mega corporate knowledge that'd make Westbrook head explode.
People act like westbrook has zero IQ. Parker last playoffs looked like a mentally retarded child.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SuperCam
Worst PG rotation of any contender by far, tbh.
Kyrie/Williams, Curry/Livingston, Westbrook/whatever, Paul/whatever.... all much better.
So there are only like six contenders. Spurs can still be top ten.
Here are some specifics: better than:
Lullard and trash? Clarkson and Russell? Rondo and belli? Wall and beal? Mavs lol?
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
I hope Parker takes a huge Whataburger infused shit on all of us this year and gets back to himself..
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
People act like westbrook has zero IQ. Parker last playoffs looked like a mentally retarded child.
No he looked like a middle age multi racial man. You're projecting.
Westbrook isn't dumb. But he's never learn the spurs offense.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K...
No he looked like a middle age multi racial man. You're projecting.
Westbrook isn't dumb. But he's never learn the spurs offense.
Westbrook instead of porker gets us a 5peat easy. MVP candidate at a young age with a stacked team AND bench with a top 3 coach of all time. :wow
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plum Island
Top 10 in pounds per square inch tbh.
So you think Parker withstands pressure well? If you're gonna make lame "Parker is Fat" jokes, try to get psi vs. density (pounds per cubic inch) right, or it just doesn't work well comedically. Fat isn't all that dense, anyway. Back to Fat Joke drawing board.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
I can't wait to see Parker shit all over the ST haters when he has a bounce back year this season.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
littlecoyotecoin
So you think Parker withstands pressure well? If you're gonna make lame "Parker is Fat" jokes, try to get psi vs. density (pounds per cubic inch) right, or it just doesn't work well comedically. Fat isn't all that dense, anyway. Back to Fat Joke drawing board.
http://fishtown.us/sites/fishtown.us...Killington.jpg
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Westbrook
Paul
Curry
Wall
Lillard
Irving
Lowry
Bledsoe
Lawson
Evans
Teague
Conley
Walker
Jackson
Gragic
Knight
Parker 17
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
south side spur
Westbrook
Paul
Curry
Wall
Lillard
Irving
Lowry
Bledsoe
Lawson
Evans
Teague
Conley
Walker
Jackson
Gragic
Knight
Parker 17
that's just starters right? I was talking about PG depth. Later I proposed to take all starting PG out of the discussion. Where do the Spurs 2 and 3 PG stack?
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plum Island
Thank you! First, I would like to thank all of the little people...
I'll get to thanking Parker later.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Mills plays wells as the second pg when Diaw or manu running the team. His shooting blends well. I like this kid as a young prospect. Has good vision and attacks, which we need from the pg, and with Aldridge and west now in the PnR, he will blend well I'm speculating.
Will be a good rotation for this type of team, that's for sure. One of the better in the league.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
littlecoyotecoin
Thank you! First, I would like to thank all of the little people...
I'll get to thanking Parker later.
Lol. In all seriousness I firmly believe we're going to see a different Parker this upcoming season, but he was simply too dense (better?) for his own good last season.
At least... I hope so.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SpursforSix
that's just starters right? I was talking about PG depth. Later I proposed to take all starting PG out of the discussion. Where do the Spurs 2 and 3 PG stack?
I'd rather have Mills and McCallum than any other point guards not listed so move the Spurs up the list as high as you want.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plum Island
Lol. In all seriousness I firmly believe we're going to see a different Parker this upcoming season, but he was simply too dense (better?) for his own good last season.
At least... I hope so.
LMA will alleviate some offensive duties for porker. Porkers legs will be more rested next year. Maybe even pop benches him when we need too and we start winning more games.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SpursforSix
18???? What 17 teams are ahead of them?
Definitely better: Cleveland, Golden State, Clippers, Grizzlies, OKC, Toronto, Washington
Probably better: Atlanta, Portland
Subjective, but better IMO: Charlotte, Miami, New Orleans
Toss-up: Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Phoenix, Sacramento
Definitely worse: Brooklyn, Dallas, Houston, Indiana, Lakers, Milwaukee, Minnesota, New York, Orlando, Philly, Utah
I could see the Spurs as good as 13th if youre being really optimistic and as low as 19th if we're keeping it 100 IMO..
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SpursforSix
Where does this stack up against the league?
Parker is still top 10. Mills might be the best backup in the league. At least as far as being able to provide instant offense. McCallum as the third option seems strong as well.
Is this the top PG rotation in the league? If not, who is better?
Way to stir the pot. Notice how all the player fans that are on here are also on your 'cursing on Spurstalk' thread?
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LongtimeSpursFan
Way to stir the pot. Notice how all the player fans that are on here are also on your 'cursing on Spurstalk' thread?
You are a player fan. Don't get it twisted. Walk along now.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dabom
LMA will alleviate some offensive duties for porker. Porkers legs will be more rested next year. Maybe even pop benches him when we need too and we start winning more games.
I agree. Hopefully he feels shamed by last season. Maybe come back with a retooled physique and a new, more team-first attitude.
That would be nice.
-
Re: Parker, Mills, McCallum
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SpursforSix
Where does this stack up against the league?
Parker is still top 10. Mills might be the best backup in the league. At least as far as being able to provide instant offense. McCallum as the third option seems strong as well.
Is this the top PG rotation in the league? If not, who is better?
:downspin: