Nah,5.75 for two years,so 2.8something a yearQuote:
Originally Posted by silverblackfan
Printable View
Nah,5.75 for two years,so 2.8something a yearQuote:
Originally Posted by silverblackfan
Good visual, but no real shocker - spurs are winningest franchise in that time period, why wouldn't they have top net ratings?
War manu
Right, but for the majority of his career, he's been a legit star mostly going against true bench players and doing so with managed minutes. That's a big advantage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diego20
Out of his 28627 total career minutes (playoffs and regular season), he played:Quote:
Originally Posted by TD 21
- 18415 mins with Duncan (64% of the time)
- 16647 mins with Parker (58% of the time)
The perception that he played the majority of his minutes against bench talent is not really true.
He played a lot more than the typical player of or above his caliber.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
He also had his minutes managed, which obviously helped him play at or near capacity and not have to concern himself with pacing.
This is certainly true.Quote:
Originally Posted by TD 21
he's not a believerQuote:
Originally Posted by ducks
Folks doing all that math. :lol
Let's say Manu would have started instead of coming off the bench, do you really think his numbers would have changed so dramatically to prevent him from still toping that list? Manu's netRtg in '05 when he started the whole season is 16.6 :lmao