-
Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
...Who Free Minks From Slaughter Are
I'm soooo confused. I really need our resident arbiter of terrorism, spurraider21 to help me out here.
Quote:
The FBI on Friday announced the arrests in Oakland of two animal rights activists, Joseph Buddenberg and Nicole Kissane, and accused the pair of engaging in “domestic terrorism.” This comes less than a month after the FBI director said he does not consider Charleston Church murderer Dylann Roof a “terrorist.” The activists’ alleged crimes: “They released thousands of minks from farms around the country and vandalized various properties.” That’s it. Now they’re being prosecuted and explicitly vilified as “terrorists,” facing 10-year prison terms.
Buddenberg and Kissane are scheduled to appear this morning in a federal court in San Francisco for a hearing on bail conditions, while arraignment is set for early September. The indictment comes just days before thescheduled start of the Animal Rights National Conference, the largest and most important annual gathering of activists. The DOJ did exactly the same thing in July of last year: Shortly before the start of the 2014 conference, they arrested two activists on federal “terrorism” charges for freeing minks and foxes from a fur farm. The multiple activists and lawyers who spoke to The Intercept since Friday’s arrests are adamant that these well-timed indictments are designed to intimidate activists at the conference and more broadly to chill campaigns to defend animal rights.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
a) i've never claimed to be this "arbiter of terrorism" but if you have to build up that strawman to feel better, continue to do so
b) i never said dylan roof wasn't a terrorist
c) the FBI already made their ruling on whether or not this was terrorism, so not sure why you need me here
d) the two guys here who are accused of terrorism aren't muslim, which destroys your ":cry theyre only terrorist if they're muslims attacking whites! :cry" narrative
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
a) i've never claimed to be this "arbiter of terrorism" but if you have to build up that strawman to feel better, continue to do so
b) i never said dylan roof wasn't a terrorist
c) the FBI already made their ruling on whether or not this was terrorism, so not sure why you need me here
d) the two guys here who are accused of terrorism aren't muslim, which destroys your ":cry theyre only terrorist if they're muslims attacking whites! :cry" narrative
a) You're self-annointed
http://i.imgur.com/ljlBrtX.png
http://i.imgur.com/2KRKzmq.png
b) No, but you decide when to arbitrarily declare certain acts of violence terrorism. Where's your "Terrorist attack in Charleston" thread?
c) Not sure if you are needed here to check assholes or not, this seems like such a contradiction of the use of the word "Terrorism" but you always know when it is, and is not, appropriate.
d) You got me :cry I guess I need to update my definition to "Muslims, people with Muslim-sounding names, or animal rights activists who may or may not carry out violence against whites"
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
a) You're self-annointed
b) No, but you decide when to arbitrarily declare certain acts of violence terrorism. Where's your "Terrorist attack in Charleston" thread?
c) Not sure if you need to check assholes or not.
d) You got me :cry I guess I need to update my definition to "Muslims, people with Muslim-sounding names, or animal rights activists who may or may not carry out violence against whites"
a) making that thread =/= claiming to be an "arbiter of terrorism." there were hundrends of articles as the story was breaking, some used the t-word, some didnt. an attack against military personnel would appear to be politically aimed
b) there was already a charleston thread by the time i got here
c) no, i'm in no position to correct the FBI
d) or you can abandon your retarded definition altogether and stop trying to play the victim
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
a) making that thread =/= claiming to be an "arbiter of terrorism." there were hundrends of articles as the story was breaking, some used the t-word, some didnt. an attack against military personnel would appear to be politically aimed
b) there was already a charleston thread by the time i got here
c) no, i'm in no position to correct the FBI
d) or you can abandon your retarded definition altogether and stop trying to play the victim
a) making a "Another shooting..." as opposed to "Terrorist Attack..." before any details emerge == self-anointed arbiter of terrorism. Assuming any attack against military is terrorism == self-anointed arbiter of terrorism
b) why didn't you check assholes in that thread and ask OP why he didn't use "Terrorist Attack" in the thread title?
c) Phew. Glad you're onboard with the "Dylann Roof is not a terrorist but animal rights activists are" definition. I was so confused. Now all is clear. So relieved you approve of the FBI's definitions.
d) or I can continue to point out the obvious hypocrisy in you trying to defend yourself from a stupid mistake instead of copping to it and moving on
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
a) making a "Another shooting..." as opposed to "Terrorist Attack..." before any details emerge == self-anointed arbiter of terrorism. Assuming any attack against military is terrorism == self-anointed arbiter of terrorism
b) why didn't you check assholes in that thread and ask OP why he didn't use "Terrorist Attack" in the thread title?
c) Phew. Glad you're onboard with the "Dylann Roof is not a terrorist but animal rights activists are" definition. I was so confused. Now all is clear. So relieved you approve of the FBI's definitions.
d) or I can continue to point out the obvious hypocrisy in you trying to defend yourself from a stupid mistake instead of copping to it and moving on
a) i didnt assign myself anything. i just made a thread, and you've reacted quite emotionally to it. this is now your 5th :cry terrorism :cry thread since then
b) i didnt feel the need to
c) wait, do i merely approve of FBI definitions or am i an arbiter? you're contradicting yourself
d) keep making a fool of yourself. you're disproportionally upset and it shows.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
a) i didnt assign myself anything. i just made a thread, and you've reacted quite emotionally to it. this is now your 5th :cry terrorism :cry thread since then
b) i didnt feel the need to
c) wait, do i merely approve of FBI definitions or am i an arbiter? you're contradicting yourself
d) keep making a fool of yourself. you're disproportionally upset and it shows.
I'm just:
a) checkin assholes
b) checkin assholes
c) checkin assholes
d) checkin assholes
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
weak.
imo your next move should be:
a) to wait for another big shooting incident
b) start a thread about it using the word "terorrist" in the title
c) mention me in the OP
d) think you made a point
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Sounds like splits is ready to blow up, tbh.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
Sounds like splits is ready to blow up, tbh.
i mean, he IS muslim. blow up seems about right :downspin:
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
I'm just:
a) melting down like a faggot
b) melting down like a faggot
c) melting down like a faggot
d) melting down like a faggot
FIFY
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Wow, all in a single thread, (within the first 12 comments!!) we have the top to bottom 3 degeneracy of ST.
At the top (meaning least degenerate, "most closely" aligned with human decency), the arbiter of terrorism
In second place, someone who actually thinks Donald the Rapist would make a good president :lmao :rollin :lmao
And at the bottom of the missing chromosome ladder, one of the most openly racist and biggest faggots on the site in SupremeGuy :lmao "Supreme Guy" as a user name! WTF, do you only fuck guys in the ass who eat pizzas with multiple toppings?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
He's getting ready to blow... :lol
https://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2...le-prophet.jpg
So are you a pedophile like your sick god?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
Are you really a serial-killer in training?
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/imag...6&type=profile
You look like Roof-2.0
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
No, now can you answer whether you're a pedophile like muhammad?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
No, now can you answer whether you're a pedophile like muhammad?
I hate all religion equally. And I hate yours even more.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
I hate all religion equally. And I hate yours even more.
You hate agnosticism? Ok, good luck with that.
Are you ever going to answer whether you're a pedophile like that sick fuck muhammad?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
You hate agnosticism? Ok, good luck with that.
Are you ever going to answer whether you're a pedophile like that sick fuck muhammad?
Yes, Mike C, I will answer your question. I hate and despise prophets/allah/jesus/yahweh/Tebow/pedos/PeterPiper/mohammed or whatever religion that worships things that don't exist. Like Tebow being a good handoval player.
What do you think, Mike? Should I expose you as a racist?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
Yes, Mike C, I will answer your question. I hate and despise prophets/allah/jesus/yahweh/Tebow/pedos/PeterPiper/mohammed or whatever religion that worships things that don't exist. Like Tebow being a good handoval player.
What do you think, Mike? Should I expose you as a racist?
But I'm not a racist. If you're going to go through my profile, at least leave me a message, tbh.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
But I'm not a racist. If you're going to go through my profile, at least leave me a message, tbh.
Don't need to do that. I have plenty of contacts, both former students and current teachers, at A&M Kingsville who can provide evidence you are and always have been a racist.
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
Don't need to do that. I have plenty of contacts, both former students and current teachers, at A&M Kingsville who can provide evidence you are and always have been a racist.
You can go ahead and find out who I am, but I'm not and have never been a racist. Are you?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SupremeGuy
You can go ahead and find out who I am, but I'm not and have never been a racist. Are you?
I hate racists. Does that make me a racist, Champ?
-
Re: Dylann Roof Is Not a “Terrorist” — But Animal Rights Activists...
I actually had my name as my title for like 2 years here, splits. You could have just asked. :toast
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
I hate racists. Does that make me a racist, Champ?
You don't hate racists, you hate certain racists.