Only David would think sex = an agreement for financial subsidization. That's clearly what "every knows better" when they're about to fuck
Printable View
Only David would think sex = an agreement for financial subsidization. That's clearly what "every knows better" when they're about to fuck
Why are you deflecting?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Why does fucking = an agreement to pay for a child if the woman chooses?
Who's David?Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
You'll be equal to a woman when you can pass a baby through your vagina.
If you don't know the risks as a male, you're an idiot. I fully believe you are an idiot.
That's the risk. If you don't want to take the risk, don't have sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
Pretty simple. I think even you can understand.
You've already been found ousted as anti-woman gender inequality loving GOP shill. I'd quit while you're ahead mi hombre.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipper Nation
I'm all for gender equality. Why do you want to deny gender equality to men?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blizzardwizard
Why are you ok with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Better said, why should a man be forced to financially subsidize a woman's decision to do with her body what she pleases?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Why would I not be? I've taken the risks. I have minimized my risks. It's easy.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
Minimizing risk is besides the point. There's still risk. The question is what should happen when the risk is realized.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Because he took that risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
If you are afraid of possible consequences, don't do it. What part of that do you not understand?
I want complete gender equality, unlike you, who supports greasy Mexicans impregnating teens and making these poor women keep that baby that in the future will be a 450lb fat man that slobs around at baseball games catching homers in his beer glass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipper Nation
If you take the risk, it is out of your hands by definition.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
That's what risk is.
Jesus, you really need this explained to you?
Again, besides the point.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
He took the risk that she'd get pregnant, yes.
He took the risk that he'd be forced to subsidize her decision to do with her body as she pleases.
Is that arrangement the most equal for the man and the woman?
Do you honestly think we should treat fucking as a man's waiver of control over his finances/agreement to pay for whatever a woman chooses?
Women and men both know the risk that sex can lead to a baby.
If the woman gets pregnant and the man wants the baby she can abort it.
If the woman gets pregnant and the man doesn't want the baby she can have it and force him to pay for it.
Gotta love gender equality.
:lol thinking men rationally evaluate the pros and cons of fucking a women minutes before they stick their dick inside.
It's an assumption of partial responsibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
The fact monetary support is the most a man is going to be forced to contribute means he's getting off pretty easy tbh.
If you think men should never be responsible for anything, tough shit.
Why wait til then?Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
Are you really this stupid?
Keep us up to date on your vagina too.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex
Still didn't answer the question. Is that arrangement equal for the man and the woman?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Who's assumed partial responsibility?
The fact that the non-monetary support for the woman is so tough is a pretty good indication that the child should not be had in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
If it's so hard on her and he's getting off pretty easy, why's she having the kid (against his wishes, ostensibly) in the first place?
And why is financially supporting a child for 18 years pretty easy?
Who's building straw men now?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Strong possibility David's never had sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I said the man is getting off easy.Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
Damn, you're stupid.Quote:
Who's assumed partial responsibility?
You're now the judge of who lives and who dies? :lmaoQuote:
The fact that the non-monetary support for the woman is a pretty good indication that the child should not be had in the first place.
Who knows? She made the choice about her body.Quote:
If it's so hard on her and he's getting off pretty easy, why's she having the kid (against his wishes, ostensibly) in the first place?
I said "if" -- I haven't really seen a scenario where you have a man taking responsibility.Quote:
Who's building straw men now?
You've never bought rubbers more than minutes before sex?Quote:
Originally Posted by vy65
If you have, then you have rationally weighed the pros and cons and acted accordingly.
Really, this is such basic stuff.
Then you should want the father to have a say in the abortion of their child.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blizzardwizard
We know your vagina bleeds 24/7 and reeks of fish, David.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper