http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ceo-ra...212850113.html
Printable View
LOL...Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
There will be whiners no matter what someone does.
No good deed goes unpunished!
Admirable tactic, stick with it, but he didn't do his homework. The senior, key people shouldn't also be making his "minimum" wage.
Why spead the wealth
CEOs,owners making too much
Spread the wealth
Happens all the time brother worked job 13 years guy started yesterday paid what he is getting
I didn't read the whole thing, but isn't the point that if you pay some well above their market value then you may not be able to foot the bill for other necessary expenses (such as higher market value wages for key employees with high-demand/specialized skill sets)?Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
are doubting the impeccable precision and perfection of the "market" (for labor)?Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
There's a point where somebody's pay isn't just about cost to the employer but fairness to, humanity of the worker.
If y'all's fucking "free market" says "fuck workers' pay down as low as possible (which is EXACTLY what it says)" then that's sociopathic capitalist "market" system.
Any social system organized to ignore the plight, the hardships, the inhumanities it creates for, forces onto its members is one fucked up social system, and obviously hasn't been organized by its all its members but only by the members which benefit from the system.
iow, America is fucked and unfuckable as long as the political class is owned by, doing the dirty work of the 1%, BigCorp.
If you pay too low, you may ignore the humanity of workers. However, if you pay too high, you may ignore the simple economics and sustainability of your business. There is a middle ground. As far as big retailers go, I hear Costco does a pretty good job of paying reasonable wages that they can also afford to pay. The key is successfully finding the middle ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Executive level (primarily CEO) wages also stand out as an issue. They have been going up and continue to go up at high rates even when the businesses they run don't always even generate positive results. I suppose a war for executive talent has really come at the expense of ordinary workers. Though there are other problems too.
"may ignore the simple economics and sustainability of your business"
if your business success depends on paying your employees poverty wages (but sustaining the costs of high turnover and disengaged employees), then you don't have a business.
what?Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
if your business success depends on paying your employees poverty wages (but sustaining the costs high turnover and disengaged employees), then you don't have a business.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
This isn't coherent.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
those are two costs of paying shitty wages, check with Walmart.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
Nobody economist believes the labor market has impeccable precision or perfection. Nobody believes the product market has that, but the labor market is even worse. For one the labor market is very inelastic. It also has far less than perfect information...ever try getting a companies salary data? Why is it taboo to ask what another employee makes? Also, with the advent of online applications companies force applicants to be the first mover in salary negotiations.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
No, its not. It is always about cost and should always be that way. A company that ignores costs because of "humanity" is going to be a failed company, and all of a sudden these poor people that you care about so much are going to be out of a job. Higher than market wages are called efficiency wages. Henry Ford was one of the first people to use them.Quote:
There's a point where somebody's pay isn't just about cost to the employer but fairness to, humanity of the worker.
I don't know what to say other than NO. You are wrong. Of course they want to pay as low as possible, but the free market says that they cant if their is competition for a persons skill set.Quote:
If y'all's fucking "free market" says "fuck workers' pay down as low as possible (which is EXACTLY what it says)" then that's sociopathic capitalist "market" system.
Better than a social system that attempts to address those issues and fails far worse than any market economy. Venezuela anyone?Quote:
Any social system organized to ignore the plight, the hardships, the inhumanities it creates for, forces onto its members is one fucked up social system, and obviously hasn't been organized by its all its members but only by the members which benefit from the system.
Stupid liberal shit without a point.Quote:
iow, America is fucked and unfuckable as long as the political class is owned by, doing the dirty work of the 1%, BigCorp.
Slutter McGee
Actually you do if the marginal expense of hiring new workers is less than your marginal revenue. But to understand how this works you would have to educate yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
And if the business fails, then the employees no longer have a job.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
I agree with raising the base pay for each position, but the base pay shouldn't be equal for all jobs at the company, hence why people left.
everybody, listen up:
If your business success depends on paying your employees poverty wages (but sustaining the costs of high turnover and disengaged employees), then you don't have a business. You're a poverty-wage-slave driver.
Federal minimum wage must be set to $15/hour for the low-cost regions, then adjusted upward for the high-cost regions, and all indexed to the regional increase in inflation, some kind of regional PPP which would include food, housing, etc.
Fed minimum wage applies to every employee,no matter how few hours worked.
pay 1.5 x minimum for 40 - 50 hours, and 2 x minimum above 50 hours.
Supply and demand should dictate the pay of all who are above minimum pay levels.Quote:
Originally Posted by ddjeffries
You are a model authoritarian.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Yup and those with specialized degrees tend to be in demand more. Hence, software engineering salaries flying through the roof. They are extremely in demand in Silicon Valley.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
that's why BigTech created a cartel to suppress salaries by agreeing not to poach employees, and import cheap programmers from India.Quote:
Originally Posted by ddjeffries
Which they settled for half a billion dollars for.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Nevermind.. Hey boutons look up Sherman and Clayton. Cartels are illegal.
Pretty much.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
Not really shocking. That was the first thing that occurred to me.
Better would have been to simply raise everybody's pay 10%
Meh. You would simply substitute the authoritarian government for authoritarian corporations, not like you have any room to talk, the only real goal of libertarianism is to deprive people of any defense against rapacious companies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
That is pretty stupid. Most libertarians are against corporatism and policies and laws that favor one corporation over another. Capture theory of regulation is very relevant, and its too bad liberals ignore it.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
About the only complaint I have of libertarians is with the anarcho capitalists and other extreme libertarians who wan't no government at all. Most anti-trust laws are crap (Robinson Patman, and both Clayton and Sherman were very badly written) but there is a legitimate roll of government to stop and prosecute cartels and price fixing.
Outside of that, Im not sure how these horrible companies are depriving people?
I know what libertarians think they are for, but reality has a way of intruding in the fantasy, just as it did for the communists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slutter McGee
Both economic models sound good on paper, until you try to implement them.
Resource asymmetry.
Yes, capture of regulation is a problem of our current system. Not sure how/why "liberals" ignore it. I certainly don't.
"Most libertarians are against corporatism"
which politicians, since libertarians can't accomplish their stuff without politicians?
the dominant theme of libertarianism seems to be small govt, which is exactly what VRWC/BigCorp wants, no govt power to regulate, stop BigCorp/BigFinance from screwing Americans, America, the planet.