-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
I dunno, must be because of all of the artillery he's going to need to steal our money for his election campaigns...
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurminator
I dunno, must be because of all of the artillery he's going to need to steal our money for his election campaigns...
AT GUNPOINT TOO, REMEMBER. Actually I think he's banging on my door right now with what sounds like the end of an M40 Rifle.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blizzardwizard
AT GUNPOINT TOO, REMEMBER. Actually I think he's banging on my door right now with what sounds like the end of an M40 Rifle.
Bernie why did you bring a bolt action?
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
It could happen! He is LITERALLY GOING TO FORCE US AT GUNPOINT to fund his campaign.
We'll be like, "But Mr. Sanders, I don't plan to vote for you!" And he'll be like, "Tough shit, Nancy, either fork over some cash for my yard signs or suck on the end of my Kalashnikov."
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheSanityAnnex
Bernie why did you bring a bolt action?
I knew you wouldn't be able to ignore me for long, I'm just so damn irresistible.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurminator
It could happen! He is LITERALLY GOING TO FORCE US AT GUNPOINT to fund his campaign.
We'll be like, "But Mr. Sanders, I don't plan to vote for you!" And he'll be like, "Tough shit, Nancy, either fork over some cash for my yard signs or suck on the end of my Kalashnikov."
:lol
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.
You flip flop more than DeAndre Jordan over abortion, Paulsucker.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
I am the Great Boutons, GFY, Repubsuckers. America is fucked and unfuckable.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blizzardwizard
You flip flop more than DeAndre Jordan over abortion, Paulsucker.
Your boy's a warmonger. No different than Bush, tbh.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
Care to explain why Bernie is so firmly in bed with Lockheed Martin and other military contractors?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.
:cry gold standard :cry
The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao
Fucking losers. All 10s of them.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.
:cry gold standard :cry
The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao
Fucking losers. All 10s of them.
:lol
But to be fair, Sanders is socialist in many ways, certainly not revolutionary but in terms of sweeping social policies to create wealth equality and the reformation of capitalism he comes pretty close to what most would consider a modern day socialist.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Splits
I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.
:cry gold standard :cry
The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao
Fucking losers. All 10s of them.
Translation: you have no explanation for why Bernie Sanders is a chickenhawk, but you are butthurt that I linked to a site you normally agree with.
:cry "You have absolutely no morals. You should support Bernie whoring his state out to the war lobby in order to help make more drone strikes and oil wars possible." :cry
:cry "You stand for absolutely nothing. You should be principled like me. I hate our foreign policy except for when Bernie's supporting it, then it's fine." :cry
:cry "Reading a wide array of news sites is idiotic and incoherent. You should stick only to the partisan echo chambers that tell you what you want to hear." :cry
:lmao Splitcuck
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Bernie and his history aren't perfect, but he's 1000% better than Hillary and the ridiculous Repug Billionaire's Klown Kar.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Th'Pusher
Neither you, nor your pussy boyfriend would answer my question. Let's try again since this is a shitbag tread anyway. Might as well derail it...
If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?
This is exactly why non-lawyers need to shut the fuck up when it comes to shit like this. Reading posts on a web forum and skimming an article from an idiot **** law student (who doesn't even practice in this area, btw) really sheds no light on the topic.
The only way to answer this question is to do a 50 state survey of each state's rape shield laws, rules of evidence, and cases construing both the laws and the rules. That is incredibly time consuming. Like weeks worth of research to be done properly.
Moreover, the fact that there is precedent to challenge a judge's exclusion of evidence only means that there's grounds for a challenge -- it doesn't mean it'll be successful.
But really, the key reason why this is so fucking retarded is that once the evidence is excluded and/or a guilty verdict reached, the damage is already done. Appellate rules create strong presumptions towards upholding jury verdicts. Meaning that even if there is a legitimate challenge, it is both possible and plausible that the challenge will be rejected regardless.
But hey slurper, you read some shit on the internet once from some **** who went to a law school that used to be a YMCA, so I guess that makes you an expert on things.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vy65
The only way to answer this question is to do a 50 state survey of each state's rape shield laws, rules of evidence, and cases construing both the laws and the rules. That is incredibly time consuming. Like weeks worth of research to be done properly.
Since slurper is so obsessed with this point, that little fagget needs to do this work or shut his pussy ass mouth the fuck up.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
thanks for admitting it would take weeks of research to back up your bs.
lol blaming other posters for not doing your own homework.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winehole23
thanks for admitting it would take weeks of research to back up your bs.
lol blaming other posters for not doing your own homework.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vy65
In some cases they do. Do you deny that?
Do you have a link to me saying all rape shield laws exclude the same evidence in all jurisdictions?
Again, what evidence do you have that my "thinly supported" opinion is overstated. You've been grasping at straws for a while now.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.
not at all. Here's some VERY mixed support:
Bernie and the Sandernistas: Into the Void
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/...+the+Headlines
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
we're at a weird political inflection point: the importance of national party committees has been eclipsed by SuperPACS, which are taking over campaigning and messaging for the candidates.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
for two national cycles in a row, billionaire backers have propelled unviable candidates and prolonged the GOP circular firing squad in the primaries.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
Bernie really is stupid. Someone voluntarily giving money to a campaign is not "legalized bribery." He, on the other hand, wants the taxpayer to be forced by the state to subsidize his campaign whether they support him or not, which is immoral.
how is it not? we'll give you x millions of dollars if you do a, b, and c
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
some posters back hard spending caps and public funding for national elections to prevent arrogant billionaires and special interests from suborning the political process; other posters seem to think that's just as it should be...whoever has the most gold picks our candidates.
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
Well...
You post something from Common Dreams, and expect any intelligent person to click on it?
-
Re: Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
diego
What does his theoretical presidency have to do with public campaign finance vs corporations owning your politicians?
He's reading from Common Dreams.
He has no intelligent answer.
