Conservative hypocrisy in action: Carson published a paper on fetal tissue research

According to Ben Carson (professional) even if life begins at conception and the government should then enter the woman's uterus, he is still allowed to perform research on 17 week old aborted fetuses.

Intellectually consistent, for sure.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y64...-slide-gif.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

According to Ben Carson (professional) even if life begins at conception and the government should then enter the woman's uterus, he is still allowed to perform research on 17 week old aborted fetuses.

Intellectually consistent, for sure.

---

Can you give me some clarification on how the government enters the woman's uterus? You lost me there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Th'Pusher

Can you give me some clarification on how the government enters the woman's uterus? You lost me there.

---

Forcing a woman to have an unwanted baby to term is not entering their uterus?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Splits

Forcing a woman to have an unwanted baby to term is not entering their uterus?

---

That would be. That's not what I understood TB's position to be.

:lol

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y64...ps39055456.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TeyshaBlue

So NPFuckingR was raping Sanger's words?
:lmao

---

What Sanger words did NPR rape?

Exactly. None

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TeyshaBlue

Exactly. None

---

this article?

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpo...m_campaign=app

No, moonbat. The one I posted right before your lazy conflation.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/pe..._eugenics.html

Or, rather, lazy attempt at conflation.

Sanger was for birth control, or fit or unfit people, not resoundingly clear, "complex", as the PBS article says.

Your adored neurosurgeon as dumbfuck, incompetent politician says Sanger was a racist who established PP in black areas to abort black babies, which is also the slander, raping her words out of context, from the pro-birth militants.

another aspect to "eugenics":

Forced sterilization of 1000s "fit" blacks was practiced in may "Christian" Confederate states

"In the end, over 65,000 individuals were sterilized in 33 states under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States in all likelihood without due multi-ethnic and ethnic minority perspective.

The 27 states where sterilization laws remained on the books (though not all were still in use) in 1956 were: Arizona,California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota,Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin.^[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization#United_States

some amazing RECENT info, supporting my position that the PIC is rotten with sadists

"during a period of four years (2006-2010). According to pundit Shanzeh Khurram, "at least 148 women at the California Institution for Women in Corona and Valley State Prison for Women in Chowchilla received tubal ligation, a surgical procedure for permanent sterilization in which a woman's fallopian tubes are closed."

Despite the fact that the practice is illegal, inmates were coerced into these invasive procedures by doctors who failed to explain the medical intricacies of the surgeries they were about to undergo."

http://mic.com/articles/53723/8-shoc...in-u-s-history

back to Sanger, the PBS and NPR articles don't make her out to be pro-abortion to suppress the black population because they were black, but she supported contraception and abortion for everygody giving them control over their lives.

I was responding directly to your moronic post


"I know how they started with Margaret Sanger who believed in eugenics"

wow, his "intelligence" certainly doesn't extend beyond his practice of medicine.


Then you started your usual game of deflection and goal post moving. Nothing new.

Ben Carson has mounted a full response to the story that he had reportedly participated in a study involving fetal tissue research— though even his answer isn’t fully satisfying.

In a post published late Thursday night on Facebook, Carson said that the claim that he actually did research on fetal tissue is “simply is not true.”

Instead, he explained, of the four doctors whose names were on the research paper, his own participation in the study was limited to supplying samples of brain tumors that he had collected from patients. Researchers then compared these with other tissue samples they already had on hand. “Pathologists do this work to gain clues about tumors,”
Carson wrote.

He continued:

I, nor any of the doctors involved with this study, had anything [sic] to do with abortion or what Planned Parenthood has been doing. Research hospitals across the country have microscope slides of all kinds of tissue to compare and contrast. The fetal tissue that was viewed in this study by others was not collected for this study.

http://www.nationalmemo.com/ben-cars...esearch-story/

:lol

Thanks for reposting that. If you'd bother to read you would've seen that here:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8164201


:rolleyes

5 Things To Know About The Center for Medical Progress' Seventh Attempt To Smear Planned Parenthood


Anti-Choice Organization Releases Another "Documentary" Video Attacking Planned Parenthood

1. Video Still Shows No Clear Evidence Of Illegality And Key Witness Provides No Evidence That Planned Parenthood Broke The Law

2. Video Features More Third-Party Tissue Procurement Companies

3. Video Uses Highly-Edited Clips Of Planned Parenthood Officials Already Debunked As Deceptively Edited And Showing Nothing Illegal

4. Video Again Largely Relies On Third-Party Technician Who Did Not Work For Planned Parenthood, But Worked For A Middleman Company That Sold Fetal Tissue Donations To Researchers

5. StemExpress Says Technician Featured In Video Violated Employment Agreement

http://mediamatters.org/research/201...dical-p/205026

Awesome. More deflection.

Inside San Antonio’s New $3 Million Abortion Facility

http://www.texasobserver.org/inside-...tion-facility/