Hillary hands over drives - after they've been professionally wiped clean!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

---

What is it specifically that the average voter is not supposed to be comfortable with?

I see Hillary was already dressed for jail today:

^What a stretch....

Shillary :lol

Just another Obama bigcorp shill.

That's three days I've bought coffee in my local shop when Fox was droning on about Hillary's emails, fantasies, conjectures, suppositions, could be's, might be's, wannabe's. Ailes must really think they've got Hillary supine and rapeable.

Fox and the right-wing hate media absolutely know the only chance, just a chance, of winning the WH is to destroy Hillary, if not in fact, then with months and months of slander, lies, FUD, fabricated controversy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

That's three days I've bought coffee in my local shop when Fox was droning on about Hillary's emails, fantasies, conjectures, suppositions, could be's, might be's, wannabe's. Ailes must really think they've got Hillary supine and rapeable.

Fox and the right-wing hate media absolutely know the only chance, just a chance, of winning the WH is to destroy Hillary, if not in fact, then with months and months of slander, lies, FUD, fabricated controversy.

---

It's an FBI investigation Boo.

Deal with it.

Fox felt really insulted, as they were REALLY insulted and ridiculed, by Hillary's "wipe" comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicCowboy

It's an FBI investigation Boo.

Deal with it.

---

... I bet it goes nowhere, finds nothing, unless Clintons have enemies in FBI, and FBI will get her for political, not legal, objectives.

"FBI investigation" is right up there with FBI shooting dozens of people over decades and NEVER making a mistake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

... I bet it goes nowhere, finds nothing, unless Clintons have enemies in FBI, and FBI will get her for political, not legal, objectives.

"FBI investigation" is right up there with FBI shooting dozens of people over decades and NEVER making a mistake.

---

Your posts just continue to confirm that you are batshit crazy.

*dizzy*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clipper Nation

---

Was this her actual reaction to the question teleprompted?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

That's three days I've bought coffee in my local shop when Fox was droning on about Hillary's emails, fantasies, conjectures, suppositions, could be's, might be's, wannabe's. Ailes must really think they've got Hillary supine and rapeable.

Fox and the right-wing hate media absolutely know the only chance, just a chance, of winning the WH is to destroy Hillary, if not in fact, then with months and months of slander, lies, FUD, fabricated controversy.

---

How exactly is the right fabricating her wiping her server?

http://www.caintv.com/state-dept.hey-we-never-issued

Which means whatever device she was using was as insecure as her homebrew server.
I guess this shouldn't be surprising when you think about it. If Hillary was using a homebrew server for all her e-mails, she'd have to get State Department IT help to set up the account on a government-issued computer, right? We already know Hillary wasn't too interested in getting government IT staff mixed up in her personal any type of her business. So why even bother to issue Hillary a computer when she wasn't going to use it anyway? You think she was going to sit there and do work on it?
No way. Hillary was going to use her own device connected to her own server. You try to get away with that at your job and tell me how it goes, but we all know the rules don't apply to America's self-styled royalty:


As the guy from CNET explains, this only further exacerbates the security problems inherent in Hillary's makeshift IT scheme. Anyone who's ever used a work-issued computer understands this. Your employer orders the computer and has it prepared in certain ways to be compatible with what's expected of you in your job. That will include the pre-loading of certain security software and possible blocking software. And in the case of the government, it apparently also includes a rather sophisticated process for marking classified material. In response to a recent column, reader UCrawford, who appears to have some knowledge about this, explained:

Classified and unclassified information are on separate servers entirely. Information classified as SECRET, for example, would never be processed on an unclassified system not rated to handle classification. You can move unclassified data up to a classified system through transferrable media fairly easily (the media would have to be approved and scanned for viruses, malware, etc). But for classified data to move down to an unclassified system, it's not just about removing markings and doing a virus scan on the thumbdrive...the data itself would have to be scrubbed of all classified references/sources/information, approved through a declassification authority, and transferred to an entirely different portable media (any unclassified thumb drive plugged into a TOP SECRET system, for example, would automatically be classified TOP SECRET and could never be plugged into an unclassified system again). It's a cumbersome process and most requests to declassify current TS data (which she's accused of having on her system) are automatically rejected because the chance of spillage is so great. And nobody would authorize TS data that hadn't been scrubbed to go to a unclassified government system...and especially not a personal system. Would never happen.
If Clinton had multiple instances of TS data on her unencrypted personal server, there's simply no way it was ever approved for transfer. Zero chance of that being a simple mistake or someone just deleting classification markings. They would have a) had to have been given access to a classified network (meaning they were briefed on proper procedure, thoroughly and repeatedly), b) put some kind of portable media into the network (illegal unless approved by the security officer...which is very unlikely), and c) downloaded classified data to it, removing the portion markings (highly illegal...and clearly explained as such to anyone with a clearance). Most people would be arrested and charged immediately for doing that if caught. In most cases, the server would be immediately seized as soon as it was recognized that classified data had been placed on it. And Clinton would have been briefed on proper procedure about classified as well, and is responsible for the behavior of all people operating under her instructions. There is zero chance she did not know that transferring data to her home server was illegal...procedure is spelled out in every single document she signed for her clearance and access.

So on top of all this, she was also operating outside the security of this system by using her own device as well as her own server.
The funniest thing about all this is that you know perfectly well Hillary set all this up to avoid public scrutiny of her e-mails. How did that work out? Now she's going to get more public scrutiny than she ever dreamed of. Some smart woman this is. Tell me again the rationale for electing her?

for the younger voters.... here is a bit of Hillary I am betting you wont remember...

Many people who may vote in the democratic primary election and the general election in 2016 have no real knowledge of Mrs. Clinton or her accomplishments. As a public service, I thought I would provide some input regarding her triumphs for consideration.

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
Many younger voters will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours
Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were:
· She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.
· She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.
· Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for lying under oath to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
· Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.
· After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

Now we are exposed to: the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans – “what difference does it make?” - Author unknown

Why is the author unknown?

CNN Busts Darrell Issa For Lying About Classified Hillary Clinton Emails

REP. DARRELL ISSA (R), CALIFORNIA: Well, Wolf, the one thing we now know is that, as they said, about 300 separate e-mails, maybe more, contain classified information. And I think it’s important to get above the discussion of classified documents and so on. If you or I go to a briefing, and we receive classified information, and we then produce an e-mail that says things that were in that briefing, that is disclosing classified information. That appears to be what happened.….

It’s not an accident to have 300 e-mails become retroactively, if you will, determined to be classified. That means somebody sent out classified information and did not recognize it as classified.

Huma, her assistant, her second daughter, :lol WTF? if you will, is brilliant. Hillary Clinton is brilliant. So the question is, are people that smart unable to recognize sensitive classified information? I don’t believe so.

And I think the FBI needs to look at this, because in fact her server may very well have been constantly observed by third parties, because quite candidly it’s not a classified network. It didn’t enjoy the robust protection that one would expect to have.

BLITZER: Well, my understanding is those 300 e-mails they’re looking at now, that they haven’t definitively ruled that it was classified information. They’re going over it right now. There seems to be a dispute going on between the State Department and other agencies of the U.S. government what should have been classified, even if it had not been classified at the time. Is that your understanding, as well?

ISSA: Well, it is. But I’ll give you a little piece of history. During my chairmanship, it was amazing how the State Department classified the most mundane information, even when publicly available. In this case, it appears as though State would like to say these things weren’t particularly classified.

Well, the CIA and NSA and other clandestine agencies appear to be appalled that very sensitive information was sent out on her nongovernment server in an unclassified format.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/08/...iticus+USA+%29

:lol Holy shit, this 0.1%er asshole Issa is SO fucking dumb

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Why is the author unknown?

---

Don't know and does it matter or make any of what was said untrue?

get ready for Joe Biden. this one might have legs.

Quote:

---

For months, the U.S. State Department has stood behind its former boss Hillary Clinton as she has repeatedly said she did not send or receive classified information on her unsecured, private email account, a practice the government forbids.

While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2016 presidential election, first sent or received it.


But the details included in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found.


The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.


In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.


This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters.


"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the White House's National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.


"If a foreign minister just told the secretary of state something in confidence, by U.S. rules that is classified at the moment it's in U.S. channels and U.S. possession," he said in a telephone interview, adding that for the State Department to say otherwise was "blowing smoke."

---

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0QQ0BW20150821

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

get ready for Joe Biden. this one might have legs.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0QQ0BW20150821

---

well, DUHHHH.

You just figuring that out?

I'm still calling Biden/Warren as the 2016 Democrat ticket.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex

Don't know and does it matter or make any of what was said untrue?

---

How does it make any of it true?

I remembered most of them but had forgotten about them stealing all that shit from the White House...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856

Quote:

---

After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.

Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

How does it make any of it true?

---

Are you saying it is untrue?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex

Are you saying it is untrue?

---

I'm asking who wrote it.

Calm down. You're as snarky as the article you posted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

I'm asking who wrote it.

Calm down. You're as snarky as the article you posted.

---

Since when is asking you to clarify considered snark?

Do you want to dispute what was written or deflect and go in circles asking who author unknown is?