It doesn't bother me. I enjoy debating about this tbh. I jus want you to explain why you think it's superficial? Because I don't think you've closely examined the two. You're just saying so becaus the Warriors are the champs?
Printable View
GSW >>>>> those Nash led Suns teams
And it's not even close
I think that the Warriors are playoff tested and committed to playing on both sides of the ball. The 2005 Suns were neither of those things. Thus my opinion that any statistical similarities are much more superficial than informative. And I did examine those statistics before posting in this thread.
The only thing those two teams have in common are they both scored a lot of points and the media constantly jerked them off 24/7.
A few differences off the top of my head:
- The Warriors can play slow. Their fast break is not a gimmick. They play excellent team ball, set good screens and get a ton of points in the paint.
- The Warriors have several guys that are excellent defenders, and they play good team defense. They're like the Heat team that got Ray Allen to play defense.
- Curry is a true two way player, scores a ton of points and actually deserves his MVP.
- The Warriors are super deep, and they can win games without grinding down their starters.
Yeah but they were jerked off for good reason. Suns won 62 games that year in a deeper league. They were averaging 110+ pts per game and say what you want about Nash...he was a dominant player at his position. Curry just does it in a different way.
People just shrug off that 05 Suns team because they didn't win a title. But they went up against a PRIME DUNCAN, PRIME MANU and a damn good Tony Parker...id say the 05 team was the best Spurs championship team.