Brief Analysis of tonights game and what it means going forward.

- The spurs took this game seriously, no doubt so lets take the its only a regular season win BS out first.

- The spurs struggle in close games for a variety of reason but the biggest culprit today is Turnovers.

- The ball handlers today, particularly parker was so predictable that it allowed houston to defend the paint the way they did. Way too much predictable PnR/Pop with Tim and Lamarcus. Very little off ball screens for the starters. The offball screens today had zero convinctions and Purpose. Bigs shit the bed tonight, both the starters and the bench.

- The bench got fucked anally by terrence Jones and I expect Draymond Green who plays minutes with the bench to exploit the lack of toughness that second unit has.

- The Spurs crunchtime execution is soo poor because of one obvious reason. THEY DO NOT HAVE a crunch time identity. Unlike the older spurs that relied on Manu, Tim and to a lesser extent Tony..this team is still stuck between transitioning from Parker/Manu heavy crunchtime to allowing Leonard or LMA to make plays..Theyve been so poor the whole season.

- Pop has been shitting the bed. He has been soo poor in terms of outbounds playcalling..

- Until they bulild an identity in late game situations, they are going to conitune to be inconsistent on a possession by possesion basis.

- Disgusting how your best player is reduced to a bail out shooter.

- Green was actually awesome in the first half. But as evident LMA-Green just dont work on offense. It just does not. When the team is running through LMA green is basiclly a non factor since his Gravity is useless when LMA has the ball.

Please seek the help that was being offered to you by your family in your recent intervention.... we are all rooting for you here.

Glad OP is back. One of the great ones. :tu

Good analysis, but because it's apo, the usual suspects will hate on this thread.

Welcome back fam.

Crunch time identity is a good point. It's good when you have 3 veterans to bail you out but we should really put the ball in LMA and Kawhi's hands the most in the 4th. Parker shooting those bricks in the 4th is both disgusting and pretty fucking unbelievable. It's one thing when it's falling (clippers game) but he kept shooting when he clearly wasn't on. It's fucking unbelievable.

Thanks for the thoughts OP.

Didn't read.

Spurs lost on Christmas per par.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 100%duncan

Welcome back fam.

Crunch time identity is a good point. It's good when you have 3 veterans to bail you out but we should really put the ball in LMA and Kawhi's hands the most in the 4th. Parker shooting those bricks in the 4th is both disgusting and pretty fucking unbelievable. It's one thing when it's falling (clippers game) but he kept shooting when he clearly wasn't on. It's fucking unbelievable.

---

Leonard is at fault too. But I susupect there is closed door politics that keeps leonad and even LMA aggressive late.

For example Leonard and LMA was phenomenal against chicago only to be reduced to bail out shooters and tip ins late game. I hate to say it, but the big 3 does stagnate the ball when they are all playing together. Adlridge is still a fatass dong, but truth be told he has veey little fault in these late game situations. Its mostly Pop-Parker-Manu and sometimes Leonard who defers in certiain catches.

Spurs can eat a fat dick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNT Eagles 2016

Spurs can eat a fat dick.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Leonard is at fault too. But I susupect there is closed door politics that keeps leonad and even LMA aggressive late.

For example Leonard and LMA was phenomenal against chicago only to be reduced to bail out shooters and tip ins late game. I hate to say it, but the big 3 does stagnate the ball when they are all playing together. Adlridge is still a fatass dong, but truth be told he has veey little fault in these late game situations. Its mostly Pop-Parker-Manu and sometimes Leonard who defers in certiain catches.

---

I mean Kawhi needed to shoot that 3 when they were down by 4 with under 40 seconds left, he decided to take a contested 2, I get it that's his fault. I hate when he does that. But before the final minute it was all Parker and/or Duncan. No touches for LMA or Kawhi. It's disgusting. This is not 2005 anymore. I hate when Parker goes hero and Pop allows it there's simply no fucking explanation.

Agree in general. Kawhi was great IMO. LMA is still underwhelming though, IMO

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 100%duncan

I mean Kawhi needed to shoot that 3 when they were down by 4 with under 40 seconds left, he decided to take a contested 2, I get it that's his fault. I hate when he does that. But before the final minute it was all Parker and/or Duncan. No touches for LMA or Kawhi. It's disgusting. This is not 2005 anymore. I hate when Parker goes hero and Pop allows it there's simply no fucking explanation.

---

Yeah that was one of the biggest culprits too. Leonard was reduced to bail out scorer in the 2nd Half. What can we do though...its on pop to figure out how to fix this kind of problems. I find it difficult.to believe he will since this has been a constant for the last year and half.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Yeah that was one of the biggest culprits too. Leonard was reduced to bail out scorer in the 2nd Half. What can we do though...its on pop to figure out how to fix this kind of problems. I find it difficult.to believe he will since this has been a constant for the last year and half.

---

It doesn't help that he can't design an end-game play aswell. We saw it with OKC, Bulls and now this game. That fucking play was designed for a left elbow LMA three, who fucking does that? Unreal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

- The spurs took this game seriously, no doubt so lets take the its only a regular season win BS out first.

- The spurs struggle in close games for a variety of reason but the biggest culprit today is Turnovers.

- The ball handlers today, particularly parker was so predictable that it allowed houston to defend the paint the way they did. Way too much predictable PnR/Pop with Tim and Lamarcus. Very little off ball screens for the starters. The offball screens today had zero convinctions and Purpose. Bigs shit the bed tonight, both the starters and the bench.

- The bench got fucked anally by terrence Jones and I expect Draymond Green who plays minutes with the bench to exploit the lack of toughness that second unit has.

- The Spurs crunchtime execution is soo poor because of one obvious reason. THEY DO NOT HAVE a crunch time identity. Unlike the older spurs that relied on Manu, Tim and to a lesser extent Tony..this team is still stuck between transitioning from Parker/Manu heavy crunchtime to allowing Leonard or LMA to make plays..Theyve been so poor the whole season.

- Pop has been shitting the bed. He has been soo poor in terms of outbounds playcalling..

- Until they bulild an identity in late game situations, they are going to conitune to be inconsistent on a possession by possesion basis.

- Disgusting how your best player is reduced to a bail out shooter.

- Green was actually awesome in the first half. But as evident LMA-Green just dont work on offense. It just does not. When the team is running through LMA green is basiclly a non factor since his Gravity is useless when LMA has the ball.

---

Welcome back Apalisoc!
Thanks for this review.
I missed parts of the game, but from what I saw you have some good points.
Against a transition team you cannot turn the ball over, that is the majority of Houston's game.
Agree with you on crunchtime execution in close games. It has been lacking. It reminds me of the Bulls game. The Bulls defended both Kawhi/LMA well, but they don't have a 2 man game between them, or much chemistry, and on those occasions, Tim and Manu showed their age.

I feel like Lamarcus has not been the superstar we hoped in those cases, maybe Pop has changed his game so much with all these lobs, but a lot of them were expected and not quite open, thus they were deflected and actually not easy shots for LMA. Many passes were just off TBH. Some lobs were too high too wide, just off the mark.

Team had an identity problem early in the season, and at this point, they seemed better, but I really don't trust Danny to close out games or even deal with tight defenses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

Agree in general. Kawhi was great IMO. LMA is still underwhelming though, IMO

---

LMA is a beta thats why hes underwhelming. Hes a weird dude. He puts in the effort most of the time but its also clear hes atrocious with Parker and Green. LMA does play well with Leonard and Duncan though.

Spurs is still a great team but if they cant figure out a way to give their best player betfer shots than bail out shots from Parker and if they cant figure out Green-LMA and Parker-LMA and what their identity is going to be late game they wil lose a lot of close games in the playoffs and that might be enough for OKC, LA and GSW to beat them.

Make no mistake the clippers will be a tough nut to crack and as well as the thunder. If they dont get a good cushion against these teams before 2 minute mark they are most likely losing.

Cavs, dubs, LA, OKC are consistent in late game situations. It might not be pretty but the players know what they need to do, they know their roles etc. This team does not.

The discouraging aspect to this game was the offensive execution. Not to mention the Hack-A-AssholeWhoPlaysNBABallYetRefusesToLearnToShootFree Throws backfired. Spurs out rebounded, out assisted, had fewer turnovers, and only three more fouls with all the intentional fouling. Without seeing a score, those categories usually are to the winners advantage.

What really stings is seeing Harden prayers fall in back to back plays. Tonight was ass and the biggest dingleberries were Danny, Tony, Manu, and West. Tim and Kawhi tried, but the rest of the team emptied their bowels all over each other's chests.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

Welcome back Apalisoc!
Thanks for this review.
I missed parts of the game, but from what I saw you have some good points.
Against a transition team you cannot turn the ball over, that is the majority of Houston's game.
Agree with you on crunchtime execution in close games. It has been lacking. It reminds me of the Bulls game. The Bulls defended both Kawhi/LMA well, but they don't have a 2 man game between them, or much chemistry, and on those occasions, Tim and Manu showed their age.

I feel like Lamarcus has not been the superstar we hoped in those cases, maybe Pop has changed his game so much with all these lobs, but a lot of them were expected and not quite open, thus they were deflected and actually not easy shots for LMA. Many passes were just off TBH. Some lobs were too high too wide, just off the mark.

Team had an identity problem early in the season, and at this point, they seemed better, but I really don't trust Danny to close out games or even deal with tight defenses.

---

Lamarcus and Kawhi actually do pretty well together. Surprisngly. The spurs just dont feel like its a viable option. They are predicable in crunch time. Very predictable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 100%duncan

I mean Kawhi needed to shoot that 3 when they were down by 4 with under 40 seconds left, he decided to take a contested 2, I get it that's his fault. I hate when he does that. But before the final minute it was all Parker and/or Duncan. No touches for LMA or Kawhi. It's disgusting. This is not 2005 anymore. I hate when Parker goes hero and Pop allows it there's simply no fucking explanation.

---

Kawhi stepped in for a 2 b/c Ariza was all over him & wouldn't let him shoot a 3. Pop fuckin' drew up an isolation play when he should have called a quick hitter.:toast

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Kawhi stepped in for a 2 b/c Ariza was all over him & wouldn't let him shoot a 3. Pop fuckin' drew up an isolation play when he should have called a quick hitter.:toast

---

Idk if we're talking about the same play but he had an open 3 off a screen handoff from Tim iirc, they were coming from a stop, he needed to shoot that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Lamarcus and Kawhi actually do pretty well together. Surprisngly. The spurs just dont feel like its a viable option. They are predicable in crunch time. Very predictable.

---

Last I checked most team have predictable crunch time plays i.e. the Terry/Dirk PnP. It's whether or not the defense can stop it that matters. I've yet to see Kawhi/LMA in a PnR/PnP play, it's fuckin' Danny/LMA or Tim/Porker:bang

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SPURt

The discouraging aspect to this game was the offensive execution. Not to mention the Hack-A-AssholeWhoPlaysNBABallYetRefusesToLearnToShootFree Throws backfired. Spurs out rebounded, out assisted, had fewer turnovers, and only three more fouls with all the intentional fouling. Without seeing a score, those categories usually are to the winners advantage.

What really stings is seeing Harden prayers fall in back to back plays. Tonight was ass and the biggest dingleberries were Danny, Tony, Manu, and West. Tim and Kawhi tried, but the rest of the team emptied their bowels all over each other's chests.

---

Pop is senile. Hes doing a great job though tbh overall. :lol..hes just a stubborn motherfucker..hes.probably not the best coach in the league anymore.

He gets really cute at times..still a great coach. Just needs to fix his guys and how they play late game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

Welcome back Apalisoc!
Thanks for this review.
I missed parts of the game, but from what I saw you have some good points.
Against a transition team you cannot turn the ball over, that is the majority of Houston's game.
Agree with you on crunchtime execution in close games. It has been lacking. It reminds me of the Bulls game. The Bulls defended both Kawhi/LMA well, but they don't have a 2 man game between them, or much chemistry, and on those occasions, Tim and Manu showed their age.

I feel like Lamarcus has not been the superstar we hoped in those cases, maybe Pop has changed his game so much with all these lobs, but a lot of them were expected and not quite open, thus they were deflected and actually not easy shots for LMA. Many passes were just off TBH. Some lobs were too high too wide, just off the mark.

Team had an identity problem early in the season, and at this point, they seemed better, but I really don't trust Danny to close out games or even deal with tight defenses.

---

damn, 2 faced as fuck on the internet. You were just hatin on this dude when he left now you are excited he is back....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Last I checked most team have predictable crunch time plays i.e. the Terry/Dirk PnP. It's whether or not the defense can stop it that matters. I've yet to see Kawhi/LMA in a PnR/PnP play, it's fuckin' Danny/LMA or Tim/Porker:bang

---

Oh thats what I meant by predicable. Most teams run the same sets over and over. The point being is tha the spurs are deep and there is no reason to play the same way the other teams play.

That Danny-LMA and Tim-Pakrer two man games has to die already
..Jesus

Happy Holidays, apo..hope you're back for good, bro, this place is too corny and vanilla without you, G..

Hope everything is good with the family..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Pop is senile. Hes doing a great job though tbh overall. :lol..hes just a stubborn motherfucker..hes.probably not the best coach in the league anymore.

He gets really cute at times..still a great coach. Just needs to fix his guys and how they play late game.

---

The Hack-A-Crap worked against the Clippers in their last matchup, but I can't remember any games where that strategy worked outside of that. It takes everyone out of rhythm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

- The spurs took this game seriously, no doubt so lets take the its only a regular season win BS out first.

- The spurs struggle in close games for a variety of reason but the biggest culprit today is Turnovers.

- The ball handlers today, particularly parker was so predictable that it allowed houston to defend the paint the way they did. Way too much predictable PnR/Pop with Tim and Lamarcus. Very little off ball screens for the starters. The offball screens today had zero convinctions and Purpose. Bigs shit the bed tonight, both the starters and the bench.

- The bench got fucked anally by terrence Jones and I expect Draymond Green who plays minutes with the bench to exploit the lack of toughness that second unit has.

- The Spurs crunchtime execution is soo poor because of one obvious reason. THEY DO NOT HAVE a crunch time identity. Unlike the older spurs that relied on Manu, Tim and to a lesser extent Tony..this team is still stuck between transitioning from Parker/Manu heavy crunchtime to allowing Leonard or LMA to make plays..Theyve been so poor the whole season.

- Pop has been shitting the bed. He has been soo poor in terms of outbounds playcalling..

- Until they bulild an identity in late game situations, they are going to conitune to be inconsistent on a possession by possesion basis.

- Disgusting how your best player is reduced to a bail out shooter.

- Green was actually awesome in the first half. But as evident LMA-Green just dont work on offense. It just does not. When the team is running through LMA green is basiclly a non factor since his Gravity is useless when LMA has the ball.

---

A very cogent analysis. I particularly like your crunch time analysis. In crunch time we were completely dysfunctional. However, I do take issue with your first point. We didn't take this game seriously enough to exert much effort, and Pop didn't take the game seriously enough to think about his strategy and play-calling very seriously. We were very disinterested.

Aldridge and Green have terrible chemistry in every facet of the offense, tbh..

Green gets very little out of the Aldridge post ups..Green can't run the pick & pop with Aldridge..Aldridge gives the ball to Green and expects him to create like Wes Matthews, for some reason, not sure how he hasn't noticed that Danny can't dribble:lol..

I know Aldridge is naturally a pussy and a beta, but he needs to be way more aggressive, rather than trying too hard to play "Spurs ball".. That era is over, tbh..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Oh thats what I meant by predicable. Most teams run the same sets over and over. The point being is tha the spurs are deep and there is no reason to play the same way the other teams play.

That Danny-LMA and Tim-Pakrer two man games has to die already
..Jesus

---

I'm talking about crunch time, you can't have guys running around like chickens w/ their heads cut off & resorting to a bailout shot against a scrambling end of game defense. Give the ball to Kawhi let LMA set a screen & go from there, take Tim out & have Danny/Manu spotting up on the opposite corner w/ Tony cutting to keep the defense occupied. If Kawhi get trapped then pitch it to Tony & let him be the secondary playmaker.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

but they don't have a 2 man game between them, or much chemistry, and on those occasions, Tim and Manu showed their age.

---

And Pop doesn't make any effort to facilitate that 2-man game, we didn't see calls to involve both...tbh.

Also, the Spurs actually have a weird tendency to ignore Kawhi's mismatches, he was guarded by Harden 7-8 minutes in the 3rd quarter and they didn't exploit it...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Cavs, dubs, LA, OKC are consistent in late game situations. It might not be pretty but the players know what they need to do, they know their roles etc. This team does not.

---

Agree with you on this.
It might just kill us if we don't figure out this one thing TBH because I really think we are very, very solid in most respects. Chemistry/identity has been an issue against elite teams. Road games against good teams have been troublesome too, particularly when our bench struggles and it wasn't quite on fire tonight or defensively stout.

\

IMO, the basket played a big part in this game. In the first half, the Rockets struggled to make baskets. In the second half, it was the Spurs struggling to make baskets. Meanwhile, both teams seemed to have much more success on the opposite end of the court.

holy shit, I agree with this guy

The only saving grace is we're still 25-6 and all of our losses have come on the road against mediocre-good teams

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Lamarcus and Kawhi actually do pretty well together. Surprisngly. The spurs just dont feel like its a viable option. They are predicable in crunch time. Very predictable.

---

Wait, I thought your initial post was about lack of crunch time identity (= dysfunctionality, = UNpredictability)? They are still in the process of moving from Tim/Manu/Tony end game to Kawhi/LMA end game. WE don't even know what we are doing at crunch time; how can we be predictable?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37

I know Aldridge is naturally a pussy and a beta, but he needs to be way more aggressive, rather than trying too hard to play "Spurs ball".. That era is over, tbh..

---

Kawhi is ready to be the man but Pop doesn't want him to dominate the ball & refuses to let him run PnR/PnPs. Tony/Manu would have to die in a car accident before Kawhi is handed the keys to run plays besides isolations.:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37

Aldridge and Green have terrible chemistry in every facet of the offense, tbh..

Green gets very little out of the Aldridge post ups..Green can't run the pick & pop with Aldridge..Aldridge gives the ball to Green and expects him to create like Wes Matthews, for some reason, not sure how he hasn't noticed that Danny can't dribble:lol..

I know Aldridge is naturally a pussy and a beta, but he needs to be way more aggressive, rather than trying too hard to play "Spurs ball".. That era is over, tbh..

---

I just said the same thing in the other thread bro. Hes such a huge beta. Aldridge needs to understand the personel around him. Pass the ball to parker or Leonard or go to work instead of that two man Green-LMA game. Fuking pussy even passes up open shots to do a two man game with Green. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

- The Spurs crunchtime execution is soo poor because of one obvious reason. THEY DO NOT HAVE a crunch time identity. Unlike the older spurs that relied on Manu, Tim and to a lesser extent Tony..this team is still stuck between transitioning from Parker/Manu heavy crunchtime to allowing Leonard or LMA to make plays..Theyve been so poor the whole season.

---

It's somewhat based on transitioning, somewhat based on the fact that neither Leonard nor Aldridge can create for others or get to the line. It also doesn't help matters, that the lineup lacks three-point shooting, particularly if Leonard has the ball in his hands.

It's the same, old problems with this team. Not only the loss, but the manner in which they lost was so predictable, that I predicted the exact way it would happen in the "they should sweep the four game home stand" thread. We're now going on a season and a half of this.

Tonight was also a perfect example of why I continue to harp on the need for a Neal/Belinelli type. Pop should have seen this coming, had Butler in uniform and played at least one of Bonner or him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

Agree with you on this.
It might just kill us if we don't figure out this one thing TBH because I really think we are very, very solid in most respects. Chemistry/identity has been an issue against elite teams. Road games against good teams have been troublesome too, particularly when our bench struggles and it wasn't quite on fire tonight or defensively stout.

\

---

LeBron/Wade/Bosh couldn't closeout games during their 1st season as the Heatles so I'm not surprised the current Spurs are struggling esp. when Tony is milk carton status. LMA is Bosh status (spot up for 3s in crunch time) so Manu/Tony need to hand the keys to Kawhi just like Wade did for Lebron.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

I just said the same thing in the other thread bro. Hes such a huge beta. Aldridge needs to understand the personel around him. Pass the ball to parker or Leonard or go to work instead of that two man Green-LMA game. Fuking pussy even passes up open shots to do a two man game with Green. :lmao

---

At this point I wouldn't mind starting Simmons since he has good chemistry w/ LMA aka can dribble/make plays:lol. Danny should just play w/ Bobo/Manu.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steeledl

damn, 2 faced as fuck on the internet. You were just hatin on this dude when he left now you are excited he is back....

---

I liked this review and let him know.
I am not like you... hate spewing out all the friking time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Make no mistake the clippers will be a tough nut to crack and as well as the thunder. If they dont get a good cushion against these teams before 2 minute mark they are most likely losing.

Cavs, dubs, LA, OKC are consistent in late game situations. It might not be pretty but the players know what they need to do, they know their roles etc. This team does not.

---

Obviously, even the Rockettes know what they are going to run, too. But how can we be "predictable" if WE don't know what our roles are?

We don't know them. Therefore, far from being predictable, we are totally dysfunctional and chaotic at crunch time in these close games.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Kawhi is ready to be the man but Pop doesn't want him to dominate the ball & refuses to let him run PnR/PnPs. Tony/Manu would have to die in a car accident before Kawhi is handed the keys to run plays besides isolations.:lol

---

This os why late game situations is so cringy. Sometimes you will see Parker or Manu differ to kawhi but Pop is such a stubborn mofo its evident at times Manu-Parker-Leonard struggle becausd they dont know what the fuck to do. They know Leonard is a much superior player but pop has his playcalls tol so they're always stuck in between.

I believe it was in the Dallas game late in the fourth when Parker passed up an open shot to pass the ball to leonard. The 1st to 3 quarter roles are in conflict with the late game roles that it fucks them up royally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

This os why late game situations is so cringy. Sometimes you will see Parker or Manu differ to kawhi but Pop is such a stubborn mofo its evident at times Manu-Parker-Leonard struggle becausd they dont know what the fuck to do. They know Leonard is a much superior player but pop has his playcalls tol so they're always stuck in between.

I believe it was in the Dallas game late in the fourth when Parker passed up an open shot to pass the ball to leonard. The 1st to 3 quarter roles are in conflict with the late game roles that it fucks them up royally.

---

The power struggle is real, it won't be long before Kawhi chokes a bitch in the locker-room.:lol I wouldn't mind if Kawhi renegade & started calling his own plays ala Kirby/Rondo/Lebron.:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I liked this review and let him know.
I am not like you... hate spewing out all the friking time.

---

Just keep it real..... don't be talking shit about him acting glad he is gone and then excitedly welcome him back.

LeBron sucked in prime time today too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TD 21

It's somewhat based on transitioning, somewhat based on the fact that neither Leonard nor Aldridge can create for others or get to the line. It also doesn't help matters, that the lineup lacks three-point shooting, particularly if Leonard has the ball in his hands.

It's the same, old problems with this team. Not only the loss, but the manner in which they lost was so predictable, that I predicted the exact way it would happen in the "they should sweep the four game home stand" thread. We're now going on a season and a half of this.

Tonight was also a perfect example of why I continue to harp on the need for a Neal/Belinelli type. Pop should have seen this coming, had Butler in uniform and played at least one of Bonner or him.

---

Leonard has shown flashes of creating. I think they are convinced he can. They are probbly going to go with die and live with Leonard in the 4th team once everyones roles settles in.

I agree about having another three pointer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Kawhi is ready to be the man but Pop doesn't want him to dominate the ball & refuses to let him run PnR/PnPs. Tony/Manu would have to die in a car accident before Kawhi is handed the keys to run plays besides isolations.:lol

---

Unfortunately for us Kawhi is our best player in every aspect of the game. I am torn. As long as he is a 45% 3-point threat, I'm not sure I,want the ball in his hands to run PnPs and such. It is a real dilemma until/unless Danny comes around.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sasaint

A very cogent analysis. I particularly like your crunch time analysis. In crunch time we were completely dysfunctional. However, I do take issue with your first point. We didn't take this game seriously enough to exert much effort, and Pop didn't take the game seriously enough to think about his strategy and play-calling very seriously. We were very disinterested.

---

I think some guys were disinterested... not all. Kawhi and LMA were balling, but Tony/Tim looked bad to start the game.

Do you feel like Tim is starting to show his age TBH? At times he does look old, there is always the defensive effort, but offensively I thought Timmy started off poorly.

Game was lost beyond just the crunchtime execution. We had many mistakes and empty posessions. Tony was bad most of the time I saw him.

I saw a brief stretch of the bench when they were engaged. Simmons made some plays. Obviously I missed 2 entire Q and some of the 4th Q. .. that is why I am so interested in others' reviews and appreciate opinions (that are not pure hate threads, more like observations and criticism.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

The power struggle is real, it won't be long before Kawhi chokes a bitch in the locker-room.:lol I wouldn't mind if Kawhi renegade & started calling his own plays ala Kirby/Rondo/Lebron.:lol

---

I dont think Manu minds at all though nor timmy. Parker and Pop is the weird cat..But i wouldnt be surpirsed to know if Pop is doing these shit in purpose to fully start running Leonard in the fourth.

Pop is such a weird dude. Plays a lot of mind games so he can get his..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steeledl

Just keep it real..... don't be talking shit about him acting glad he is gone and then excitedly welcome him back.

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

I dont think Manu minds at all though nor timmy. Parker and Pop is the weird cat..But i wouldnt be surpirsed to know if Pop is doing these shit in purpose to fully start running Leonard in the fourth.

Pop is such a weird dude. Plays a lot of mind games so he can get his..

---

Tim doesn't get in anyone's way but Manu can't help himself but play hero ball when the opportunity presents itself. :lol Pop rarely calls crunch time plays for Porker so that isn't the issue.:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37

Aldridge and Green have terrible chemistry in every facet of the offense, tbh..

Green gets very little out of the Aldridge post ups..Green can't run the pick & pop with Aldridge..Aldridge gives the ball to Green and expects him to create like Wes Matthews, for some reason, not sure how he hasn't noticed that Danny can't dribble:lol..

I know Aldridge is naturally a pussy and a beta, but he needs to be way more aggressive, rather than trying too hard to play "Spurs ball".. That era is over, tbh..

---

I suspect they are both doing what Pop wants.
I can't think they would go to that play without Pop's sanction.
It's the same with Tony heroballing. Whether it works or not, Pop lets him. When Pop wants the ball to move, he commands it.
...
Danny has been the worst player in our regular rotation. It is a problem. I am not sure about Simmons starting over him TBH. I don't think Pop is ready to try that, and I don't think Danny is a good fit for the bench. In case people haven't noticed it is not so much drive and kick by Manu as all perimeter players in the bench making plays off the dribble nowadays, even Patty is dribbling much more, and both Simmons/Kyle make plays too on their own cutting and driving. That is not Danny's game. Danny needs to start, but he's been awful in Pop's new role or offense.

It really needs to be Kawhi/LMA 2 man game, not Danny. Danny needs to spot up and give up the ball if he doesn't have a shot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sasaint

Unfortunately for us Kawhi is our best player in every aspect of the game. I am torn. As long as he is a 45% 3-point threat, I'm not sure I,want the ball in his hands to run PnPs and such. It is a real dilemma until/unless Danny comes around.

---

In that case, Simmons FTW:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Leonard has shown flashes of creating. I think they are convinced he can. They are probbly going to go with die and live with Leonard in the 4th team once everyones roles settles in.

I agree about having another three pointer.

---

Not really. I'm sure he'll get incrementally better in those situations, almost by default (similar to a DeRozan), but he's just not cut out to be that kind of player, at least on a championship team.

This is less of a chemistry issue than it's being made out to be. As I've said umpteen times, we saw it all of last season, too. They're atrocious in the clutch, especially on the road, against .500 or better teams, mainly because they no longer have a traditional go-to perimeter player.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TD 21

Not really. I'm sure he'll get incrementally better in those situations, almost by default (similar to a DeRozan), but he's just not cut out to be that kind of player, at least on a championship team.

This is less of a chemistry issue than it's being made out to be. As I've said umpteen times, we saw it all of last season, too. They're atrocious in the clutch, especially on the road, against .500 or better teams, mainly because they no longer have a traditional go-to perimeter player.

---

Hard to improve when you go unnoticed for a long stretch and all you're suddenly expected to bail the team out with a minute left to play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Tim doesn't get in anyone's way but Manu can't help himself but play hero ball when the opportunity presents itself. :lol Pop rarely calls crunch time plays for Porker so that isn't the issue.:lol

---

Said the same thing about Manu but i dont want to get in heated arguments and sensless aeguments with elnono. Even Manu admitted in his last intervire sometimes he shoots too much aka Heroball :lmao

I said it after the bulls game and everyone came storming at me with a bleeding vagina only for manu to admit he shoots too much at times a week after in one of his interviews. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Leonard has shown flashes of creating.

---

Agree. We have seen some nice pick and rolls between Kawhi and Tim, in fact, Tim scored after one of those p&r in the 4th quarter...

At this point of the season, Kawhi should replace Danny in the equation of two man game with LMA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TD 21

Not really. I'm sure he'll get incrementally better in those situations, almost by default (similar to a DeRozan), but he's just not cut out to be that kind of player, at least on a championship team.

This is less of a chemistry issue than it's being made out to be. As I've said umpteen times, we saw it all of last season, too. They're atrocious in the clutch, especially on the road, against .500 or better teams, mainly because they no longer have a traditional go-to perimeter player.

---

Going to have to disagree with you here. Still, i think you are one of the few here who actually knows the sports so you can be right.

My point being is that there are various ways to get a clutch touch. Either on the triple threat or deep post. They are a great defensive team, they can afford to go this route offensively as oppopsed to a full breakdown the defense in crunch time via perimetter attackers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TD 21

Not really. I'm sure he'll get incrementally better in those situations, almost by default (similar to a DeRozan), but he's just not cut out to be that kind of player, at least on a championship team.

---

-He doesn't have bad numbers in those situations, in fact, the last time I looked at his stats he was the 2nd best Spurs player in those pick and roll situations after Parker.

-If Danny driving and trying to run pick and rolls is the option, I'd rather to see Kawhi with the ball in his hands instead of Green.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

In that case, Simmons FTW:lol

---

I would argue Kyle.
I think Kyle is more clutch and smart in half court offense and has come through in games against playoff teams already playing with the starters (Grizzlies/Boston). Both games saved possessions and made the right play. He was very good defensively too might I remind you.

It won't matter though. Danny is not getting benched. We might get off that wagon early.

It is like calling for Tony to get benched last season: it ain't going to happen.

Live and die by Danny I guess. What I hope is that Pop adjusts his role.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Said the same thing about Manu but i dont want to get in heated arguments and sensless aeguments with elnono. Even Manu admitted in his last intervire sometimes he shoots too much aka Heroball :lmao

I said it after the bulls game and everyone came storming at me with a bleeding vagina only for manu to admit he shoots too much at times a week after in one of his interviews. :lmao

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I think some guys were disinterested... not all. Kawhi and LMA were balling, but Tony/Tim looked bad to start the game.

Do you feel like Tim is starting to show his age TBH? At times he does look old, there is always the defensive effort, but offensively I thought Timmy started off poorly.

Game was lost beyond just the crunchtime execution. We had many mistakes and empty posessions. Tony was bad most of the time I saw him.

I saw a brief stretch of the bench when they were engaged. Simmons made some plays. Obviously I missed 2 entire Q and some of the 4th Q. .. that is why I am so interested in others' reviews and appreciate opinions (that are not pure hate threads, more like observations and criticism.)

---

I do not agree that LMA was balling. He looked as soft and bereft of energy as any game since he joined the Spurs. Kawhi may have been but the others on the floor with him were getting the ball to him for the most part at times or spots that were quite awkward expecting him to go get his own and bail them out.

As for Tim, it is impossible for me to judge at this stage of the season. Frankly, it has been my assumption all along that the plan was for Tim's role to diminish through this regular season as we brought LMA online. I expected this process to be complete when late this season or next, Tim came off the bench with the second unit (which would be in large part our old starting lineup). With that assumption, I gauged Tim's performance this season to be one of disciplined deference to our future "stars". (His stats are already at second unit-type levels.) Seen through that lens, I have not seen games like this as a sign of age, but of Tim's kind of losing his way, his understanding of his new role when others are expected to be The Man at crunch time. But, it is possible that my assumptions have clouded my perception, and these type performances are just a sign of age. The team, while looking very encouraging at times, is still struggling to discover its new identity - especially at crunch time, as apalisoc_9 brought out in his thread. I am willing to give Tim the benefit of the doubt until after the Rodeo Roadtrip.

IMHO, Simmons and Kawhi were the lone bright spots tonight. Every time out now, Simmons looks more and more comfortable and confident, playing within himself, making plays not turnovers. He will get some decent, regular rotation minutes before the season is over if he continues to make these strides.

To be honest, Pop worries me as much as the guys on the floor. He doesn't seem to know what he wants the team to do at times. He doesn't know how to use all of his new toys, and it is distracting him more than his usual mad science. If I had been Pop, I would have played Simmons more and Manu less in the second half. I also would have played Patty at crunch time. (Come to think of it, Patty was a bright spot, too.) for a team that played the most beautiful series in NBA playoff history and had that fabulous 8-pass possession just last game, our passing tonight was an abomination - laughably bad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I would argue Kyle.
I think Kyle is more clutch and smart in half court offense and has come through in games against playoff teams already playing with the starters (Grizzlies/Boston). Both games saved possessions and made the right play. He was very good defensively too might I remind you.

It won't matter though. Danny is not getting benched. We might get off that wagon early.

It is like calling for Tony to get benched last season: it ain't going to happen.

Live and die by Danny I guess. What I hope is that Pop adjusts his role.

---

Kyle will never play over simmons or any meanigful games until he starts taking those wide ope corner threes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Kyle will never play over simmons or any meanigful games until he starts taking those wide ope corner threes.

---

You might be quite right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Kyle will never play over simmons or any meanigful games until he starts taking those wide ope corner threes.

---

Against Minny he was a little more intent on taking his shot, and he hit a trey, IIRC. I think the guy can develop that shot to a respectable level, but 1) he has to be more aggressive and 2) Pop has to encourage it more and cut him a little more slack. Not sure either one of those things will happen this season, if ever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sasaint

I do not agree that LMA was balling. He looked as soft and bereft of energy as any game since he joined the Spurs. Kawhi may have been but the others on the floor with him were getting the ball to him for the most part at times or spots that were quite awkward expecting him to go get his own and bail them out.

As for Tim, it is impossible for me to judge at this stage of the season. Frankly, it has been my assumption all along that the plan was for Tim's role to diminish through this regular season as we brought LMA online. I expected this process to be complete when late this season or next, Tim came off the bench with the second unit (which would be in large part our old starting lineup). With that assumption, I gauged Tim's performance this season to be one of disciplined deference to our future "stars". (His stats are already at second unit-type levels.) Seen through that lens, I have not seen games like this as a sign of age, but of Tim's kind of losing his way, his understanding of his new role when others are expected to be The Man at crunch time. But, it is possible that my assumptions have clouded my perception, and these type performances are just a sign of age. The team, while looking very encouraging at times, is still struggling to discover its new identity - especially at crunch time, as apalisoc_9 brought out in his thread. I am willing to give Tim the benefit of the doubt until after the Rodeo Roadtrip.

IMHO, Simmons and Kawhi were the lone bright spots tonight. Every time out now, Simmons looks more and more comfortable and confident, playing within himself, making plays not turnovers. He will get some decent, regular rotation minutes before the season is over if he continues to make these strides.

To be honest, Pop worries me as much as the guys on the floor. He doesn't seem to know what he wants the team to do at times. He doesn't know how to use all of his new toys, and it is distracting him more than his usual mad science. If I had been Pop, I would have played Simmons more and Manu less in the second half. I also would have played Patty at crunch time. (Come to think of it, Patty was a bright spot, too.) for a team that played the most beautiful series in NBA playoff history and had that fabulous 8-pass possession just last game, our passing tonight was an abomination - laughably bad.

---

I only watched sections of the game, so I could quite be wrong on LMA overall, just the minutes I watched he was fine I guess.

I thought Kawhi kept making defensive plays specially in the 2nd Q, that is why I think regardless of how the game went for him offensively, he was trying to win this one. The minutes I watched of him, he was competing.

I am unsure about Tim's role. To start the season, I thought he was posting up on the left block and grabbing post up position before LMA early and thus bumping LMA to the dunker's spot, which aggravated LMA early deferential state and lack of aggressiveness. I really thought there was some bumping going on between them, not intentional, just Tim getting to his spots out of habit, LMA not getting to his spots bc he doesn't want to step on toes. At the time, Tim gave an interview when he admitted the team didn't have an established identity and he didn't even know his own role. It has started to come together, defense first, the lob throws, Tony had played really well until this game getting everyone involved and picking his spots, and Pop was taking advantage of Tim's passing skill, etc. Tim is still special in the SL and honestly when its been LMA/West, as good of a passer as West is, they are not as good. But I thought Tim didn't look good this game. He also struggled against the Pels. and Bulls. It is kind of a pattern when we struggle that Tim is not quite himself. Note we won games without Tim too. Wizards we went with Boban. Timberpups last game, all the starters got benched in the 3rd Q, and although ppl want to diminish the contributions by Kyle, the 3rd Q was his best showing. I thought the SL in the Timberwolves game didn't have the energy either, and may I also remind others the game was close until that 3rd Q. It was not on Kawhi. I thought Tim/LMA were having a bad game.

The concern is that Simmons or Kyle are unlikely to bump anyone in the rotation, right now they are bumping just each other, and both guys can play and have played well when given opportunities. I believe in Kyle's potential and I think he was very restrained by Pop to start the season bc the kind of player he can become you have to truly, really trust. At his core, he's a guy that likes to make plays for others, but he's a young kid, basically a rookie since Pop sent him down to the dleauge last year and didn't really concern himself with him until this season. It doesn't surprise me that Pop is reluctant to trust this two bc it took Pop a good 3 years to trust Kawhi with the ball to begin with. I would not expect either guy to be fasttracked. Kyle is young and the Spurs can afford to take a scenic route with him. To really use him at his best you have to trust him like you trust Manu. He's going to have to earn that from Pop, and Pop is going to be supremely tough (tougher than on Manu, he wont get away with bad shot selection, TO, etc)

I believe Simmons broke through because even if he's not trusted with the ball, he's a great transition scorer, and plays well off the ball and off other people. He's a better roleplayer right way, and his transition scoring is something that the team really lacks outside of Kawhi, but in reality, in terms of trust he is in the same boat.

Pop has had the luxury or relying on his vets this long. Even a guy of Kawhi's talent (a genuine MVP candidate in this league in his own right) didn't even really get Pop's trust with the ball until last season. Heck fans in this boards are still claiming for Kawhi to get the ball more. So even though I love both Simmons and Kyle and believe in their potential, I also think they are not getting fasttracked in any way over what it took Kawhi to get to where he is, specially not over Manu or Danny.

The concern for me right now is why Pop is trusting Danny with the ball so much, I don't think he's done well. I am thinking maybe Pop is stuck at this point.

Some great analysis and some people over thinking. Pops letting them figure it out. Pop can play God and clone an idea of his or he can let things play out and be as it should. Problem is we got a couple players who are still in the mold in which they were crafted and who can blame them. They can still get w's but when they aren't on it's a L. Parker and everybody can say its KL and LMA's team all they want but until they start letting them lead in the clutch we are only sewing seeds of future failure due to a lack of identity. KL and LMA need clutch shots that win or lose games and they need the big 3's trust and support during the learning curve. When it was Duncan's team we went at Shaq even though it didn't seem like it was a good matchup or favorable. You win some you lose some. Bottom line the play should be a Leonard post or a Aldridge post or even pick and pop. Put KL and LMA in a pick and roll and get everyone out the way. Two best players working together.

Side note: Some players have off nights. Just because a player has a percentage next to his name doesn't mean he's going to reach it every night.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I would argue Kyle.
I think Kyle is more clutch and smart in half court offense and has come through in games against playoff teams already playing with the starters (Grizzlies/Boston). Both games saved possessions and made the right play. He was very good defensively too might I remind you.

It won't matter though. Danny is not getting benched. We might get off that wagon early.

It is like calling for Tony to get benched last season: it ain't going to happen.

Live and die by Danny I guess. What I hope is that Pop adjusts his role.

---

Does he pull out or finish inside?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNT Eagles 2016

Does he pull out or finish inside?

---

Rude!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

Rude!

---

Just kidding! Sorry. I thought you ignored me earlier, that's what you posted :( I promise I won't say anything like that again if you don't ignore me... please? = )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNT Eagles 2016

Just kidding! Sorry. I thought you ignored me earlier, that's what you posted :( I promise I won't say anything like that again if you don't ignore me... please? = )

---

I ignored you in the thread, bc we were loosing the game and you were going ballistic lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

- The spurs took this game seriously, no doubt so lets take the its only a regular season win BS out first.

- The spurs struggle in close games for a variety of reason but the biggest culprit today is Turnovers.

- The ball handlers today, particularly parker was so predictable that it allowed houston to defend the paint the way they did. Way too much predictable PnR/Pop with Tim and Lamarcus. Very little off ball screens for the starters. The offball screens today had zero convinctions and Purpose. Bigs shit the bed tonight, both the starters and the bench.

- The bench got fucked anally by terrence Jones and I expect Draymond Green who plays minutes with the bench to exploit the lack of toughness that second unit has.

- The Spurs crunchtime execution is soo poor because of one obvious reason. THEY DO NOT HAVE a crunch time identity. Unlike the older spurs that relied on Manu, Tim and to a lesser extent Tony..this team is still stuck between transitioning from Parker/Manu heavy crunchtime to allowing Leonard or LMA to make plays..Theyve been so poor the whole season.

- Pop has been shitting the bed. He has been soo poor in terms of outbounds playcalling..

- Until they bulild an identity in late game situations, they are going to conitune to be inconsistent on a possession by possesion basis.

- Disgusting how your best player is reduced to a bail out shooter.

- Green was actually awesome in the first half. But as evident LMA-Green just dont work on offense. It just does not. When the team is running through LMA green is basiclly a non factor since his Gravity is useless when LMA has the ball.

---

Great points. I think that Danny and Timmy have lost their offensive identities in the SL. Tim has the talent to kind of make it work, whereas Danny relies on that pristine ball movement to make his impact offensively.

You bring up a very good point about the identity crisis being a big reason for the crunch time success, but I don't want us running the offense through LMA in crunch time, tbh. With the regression of his post game, he's now more suitable as a second-banana type. Kawhi should be a go-to guy, but his inability to effectively attack the basket is a big negative. His 1st step is mediocre and he just doesn't do a good job of dipping his shoulder consistently on his dribble drives. Once he improves one or both of those flaws, he'd be a MORE viable late-game iso or pnr option.

On another note, I honestly don't know what I'll do if I see another pathetic low-post pumpfake/forced shot combo from LMA...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I ignored you in the thread, bc we were loosing the game and you were going ballistic lol

---

Alright then lol glad we're on okay terms now

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNT Eagles 2016

Alright then lol glad we're on okay terms now

---

:toast

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TDfan2007

Great points. I think that Danny and Timmy have lost their offensive identities in the SL. Tim has the talent to kind of make it work, whereas Danny relies on that pristine ball movement to make his impact offensively.

You bring up a very good point about the identity crisis being a big reason for the crunch time success, but I don't want us running the offense through LMA in crunch time, tbh. With the regression of his post game, he's now more suitable as a second-banana type. Kawhi should be a go-to guy, but his inability to effectively attack the basket is a big negative. His 1st step is mediocre and he just doesn't do a good job of dipping his shoulder consistently on his dribble drives. Once he improves one or both of those flaws, he'd be a MORE viable late-game iso or pnr option.

On another note, I honestly don't know what I'll do if I see another pathetic low-post pumpfake/forced shot combo from LMA...

---

Yeah LMA is a hideous post up option as I have said months ago when posters where getting at me for saying it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Leonard is at fault too. But I susupect there is closed door politics that keeps leonad and even LMA aggressive late.

---

lol conspiracy!

Win some lose some....wasn't spurs night...Spurs play rockets again.....Jan 2......Spurs win in a blowout....Book it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

I would argue Kyle.
I think Kyle is more clutch and smart in half court offense and has come through in games against playoff teams already playing with the starters (Grizzlies/Boston). Both games saved possessions and made the right play. He was very good defensively too might I remind you.

It won't matter though. Danny is not getting benched. We might get off that wagon early.

It is like calling for Tony to get benched last season: it ain't going to happen.

Live and die by Danny I guess. What I hope is that Pop adjusts his role.

---

Kyle should have been put in the court against the Rockets. It was obvious the Parker had trouble finding any openings to score. The Rockets and Clippers have very good defenses in the paint that Parker has trouble scoring against. At least KA can score against a player that is stuck to his hip.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TDfan2007

Great points. I think that Danny and Timmy have lost their offensive identities in the SL. Tim has the talent to kind of make it work, whereas Danny relies on that pristine ball movement to make his impact offensively.

You bring up a very good point about the identity crisis being a big reason for the crunch time success, but I don't want us running the offense through LMA in crunch time, tbh. With the regression of his post game, he's now more suitable as a second-banana type. Kawhi should be a go-to guy, but his inability to effectively attack the basket is a big negative. His 1st step is mediocre and he just doesn't do a good job of dipping his shoulder consistently on his dribble drives. Once he improves one or both of those flaws, he'd be a MORE viable late-game iso or pnr option.

On another note, I honestly don't know what I'll do if I see another pathetic low-post pumpfake/forced shot combo from LMA...

---

The best three players in a post up are:

Diaw
Leonard
Anderson

I rate Diaw higher than Leonard because he can also make the passing play.

LMA isn't even close to these 3. Furthermore, he's not even ahead of Tim Duncan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TDfan2007

Great points. I think that Danny and Timmy have lost their offensive identities in the SL. Tim has the talent to kind of make it work, whereas Danny relies on that pristine ball movement to make his impact offensively.

You bring up a very good point about the identity crisis being a big reason for the crunch time success, but I don't want us running the offense through LMA in crunch time, tbh. With the regression of his post game, he's now more suitable as a second-banana type. Kawhi should be a go-to guy, but his inability to effectively attack the basket is a big negative. His 1st step is mediocre and he just doesn't do a good job of dipping his shoulder consistently on his dribble drives. Once he improves one or both of those flaws, he'd be a MORE viable late-game iso or pnr option.

On another note, I honestly don't know what I'll do if I see another pathetic low-post pumpfake/forced shot combo from LMA...

---

Lets be fair to Leonard, he can't be both working his ass off in defense and carrying the offensive load in offense. Somebody else has got to take that offensive load and unfortunately Spurs have a max player that does have the talent but lacks the skillset, basketball IQ and toughness to play. Spurs just have a bigger Richard Jefferson on the team.

Spurs had the opportunity to steal a Draymond Green, but they picked up a weak-minded LMA instead.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SAGirl

The concern for me right now is why Pop is trusting Danny with the ball so much, I don't think he's done well. I am thinking maybe Pop is stuck at this point.

---

I definitely want Danny in the court because he does an excellent job in defense. Though his passing skills are nowhere near either Anderson's or Simmons and hopefully he's not forcing the issue because he can see that younger guys can actually pass!

Spurs had both defensive and offensive problems in this game. The offense during crunch time was the biggest problem. Parker had zero opportunities penetrate. Duncan got in the groove late in the game, but was horrible most of the game. Spurs need a consistent scorer in offense but don't really have one if Leonard has to work overtime also in defense. Leonard is best as a second option and messes up when he needs to force the issue. Spurs also don't want to be playing Lebron ball.

The missing piece is obviously LMA, who supposedly should be a threat offensively. Yet, he was guarded by second year player Clint Capella.... Max player LMA can't even score against Clint Capella!!! That's because he just doesn't have advanced skills that he can exploit against younger players. For the record, LMA scored a total of 6 points the entire 2nd half of the game.

Spurs didn't have a chance to get Draymond Green. Dude was a RFA and would have stayed in GSW regardless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UNT Eagles 2016

Spurs didn't have a chance to get Draymond Green. Dude was a RFA and would have stayed in GSW regardless.

---

I think you forget what happened pre-season, Green had issues because GSW wasn't willing to pay up.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13...-impasse-talks

Spurs could have used that opportunity to put the squeeze on GSW. Either up their salary or snatch up one of their best play makers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurtech09

Win some lose some....wasn't spurs night...Spurs play rockets again.....Jan 2......Spurs win in a blowout....Book it

---

Yeah if last game was at home we would have won.

Draymond is a huge beneficiary of curry :lol curry attracts so much attention thus leading to cutting lanes, open shots etc this team would be worse with draymond as he has a worse skillset than LMA

As Mel_13 would say #ceperez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 100%duncan

Draymond is a huge beneficiary of curry :lol curry attracts so much attention thus leading to cutting lanes, open shots etc this team would be worse with draymond as he has a worse skillset than LMA

As Mel_13 would say #ceperez

---

LMA with a skillset??? WTF are you talking about. He's got next to zero skills.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ceperez

LMA with a skillset??? WTF are you talking about. He's got next to zero skills.

---

#ceperez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

Agree in general. Kawhi was great IMO. LMA is still underwhelming though, IMO

---

He created many opportunities for himself, just to have his teammates hit his ankles with the ball or throw a lob into the rafters. There was no one between him and the basket quite a few times and an errant pass resulted in a TO. I thought he was using the system perfectly, the team just wasn't capitalizing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mnky

He created many opportunities for himself, just to have his teammates hit his ankles with the ball or throw a lob into the rafters. There was no one between him and the basket quite a few times and an errant pass resulted in a TO. I thought he was using the system perfectly, the team just wasn't capitalizing.

---

You know how many fucking lobs by tim were shit and how many shitty passes by tony. OMG. :lmao

I SUSPECT

Closed door politics keep Leonard from...


And people take this clown seriously. His sauces in the locker room...
This is just pitiful.

Good take by OP. Welcome back from your vacation or whatever it was.

Turnovers, defensive rebounding early (when a cushion should have been built) and missed layups were the reason for losing.

I was actually surprised to see Rockets had the same number of TO and less OReb. Hack-a wasn't the culprit either - Capella and Howard combined for under 50%.

Kawhi, LMA and Duncan all had good games, as did Green defensively. But when the guards all shit the bed, this team's going to struggle to score. Scary as Houston put out a defense to snuff out Spurs offense similar to what GS and OKC employ.

On the bright side, the Spurs lost by only four to a team that has turned the corner recently and has been good at home despite playing its worst game of the season, save the NOP game when Ryan Anderson turned into Larry Bird.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ceperez

Kyle should have been put in the court against the Rockets. It was obvious the Parker had trouble finding any openings to score. The Rockets and Clippers have very good defenses in the paint that Parker has trouble scoring against. At least KA can score against a player that is stuck to his hip.

---

No surprise Simmons had the lowest +/- and yes, I know the stat can be taken out of context.

His poor shooting killed Spurs in a game they had bad spacing. A shooter or Anderson, who's more careful with the ball and a better passer (Simmons has shown flashes of being a decent passer) would have been preferred. Not to mention Simmons is bad on D defending pick and roll teams.

Okay... I exaggerate about LMA ineptness. He's got about the level of skills as Dwight Howard. Happy now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

You know how many fucking lobs by tim were shit and how many shitty passes by tony. OMG. :lmao

---

Yes and yes. Tony I expect it, has always hit the bigs in their ankles. Tim..was driving me crazy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Kyle will never play over simmons or any meanigful games until he starts taking those wide ope corner threes.

---

Watched some sections in league pass that I missed last night. Simmons passes open 3s just as much Tbh. He passed on two wide open last night and missed the one he took. They were helping off him pretty strongly, but it would have been the same for Kyle. We can't really say either guy is a shooter. I think they are both very reluctant at this point and will have to be pushed by the coaching staff to shoot, same as they had to push Boris.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cjw

No surprise Simmons had the lowest +/- and yes, I know the stat can be taken out of context.

His poor shooting killed Spurs in a game they had bad spacing. A shooter or Anderson, who's more careful with the ball and a better passer (Simmons has shown flashes of being a decent passer) would have been preferred. Not to mention Simmons is bad on D defending pick and roll teams.

---

Kyle is just really good in half court sets. An unlikely stat, other than Tony he has the highest % of the team on self generated unassisted 2 pt shots. Those are all the midrange buckets he has created entirely for himself when he's forced to save a possession that was going nowhere. It's a significant fact when you consider Danny can't get his own shot or save possessions if the ball ends up in his hands in crunch time, and Manu has been great for the most part, but struggled some games, and when he does, Danny is inadequate. Tony was very poor last night too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ceperez

I definitely want Danny in the court because he does an excellent job in defense. Though his passing skills are nowhere near either Anderson's or Simmons and hopefully he's not forcing the issue because he can see that younger guys can actually pass!

Spurs had both defensive and offensive problems in this game. The offense during crunch time was the biggest problem. Parker had zero opportunities penetrate. Duncan got in the groove late in the game, but was horrible most of the game. Spurs need a consistent scorer in offense but don't really have one if Leonard has to work overtime also in defense. Leonard is best as a second option and messes up when he needs to force the issue. Spurs also don't want to be playing Lebron ball.

The missing piece is obviously LMA, who supposedly should be a threat offensively. Yet, he was guarded by second year player Clint Capella.... Max player LMA can't even score against Clint Capella!!! That's because he just doesn't have advanced skills that he can exploit against younger players. For the record, LMA scored a total of 6 points the entire 2nd half of the game.

---

I think Danny is a liability in crunch time. Defenses are tougher and he can't get his own shot or make the right play for someone else, he just makes very bad decisions. POP wants everyone to be unselfish even in crunch time which is why he sticks with Manu over Danny. Manu at 25 mins this game, IMO too much. He's good for 20, at most 22. After that he's tired, his shot will abandon him and he will get in Manu brain farts-he wants to take over, but can't. Manu has heart though, always will try to win a game and go down trying. He just can't like he used to.

I haven't been a fan of Pop overpaying Manu in games. We have rarely won in those situations (maybe very early in the season when Manu was well rested and had a very strong start. Even then it was against subpar competition.)

POP should really trust Anderson or Simms more. Kawhi 40 mins. It's possible the mins on Kawhi combined with his exertion on defense is leaving him depleted to close out these games. It was similar against Chicago.

Boris and David also struggled defending the Rockets bigs and we must admit Kyle is better defensively than Simmons. He's disruptive in passing lanes, racks up deflections, blocks shots, gets steals, not foul prone, better contesting shots and going around or under screens. Simmons is much better on pressuring the ball, but does a poor job on maneuvering screens and doesn't have the tools to alter shots or passing lanes like Anderson, due to Anderson's quick hands and his length.

OP is a faggot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by unforeseen

OP is a faggot.

---

I second that motion.