Warriors are terrifying, tbh..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chinook

Nah. you've just been completely driven off your ground and are still trying to claim you had a legitimate argument.



No one's ever argued that. It's not evidence of anything by itself. You need the "the top two scorers scoring more points is critical to a team winning" premise to connect them. That is the actual point of contention, and unless you're willing to go that far, your "evidence" means nothing.



No team's proven they can stop the Spurs either, jackass. SA did just blitzkrieg the shit out of the SB, though. You can say what you want about the role-players, but when you base your ENTIRE FUCKING ARGUMENT around PPG for those guys, them clearly being reduced to negatives is a big freaking deal.



No one cares about your opinion or mine. But no, the Spurs have been historically good against Curry, including the most recent game. You cherry-picking one game isn't a sign or anything other than a man desperately wanting to be right.



Um, no. Last night was a better victory than a blowout would have been. Again, teams get blown out all the time. It's not a big deal. In fact, GS has been blown out in five of their seven losses this season. Kerr would have just burned the tape and moved on. This was a game the Warriors wanted and couldn't get. They weren't able to close, even when having the lead in the fourth. Don't let the post-game comments fool you: This was the Warriors' worst loss of the year. Only people like you think GS will just blow out SA in four games. The Spurs getting a tight 50-50 game is much more informative.



I don't have a ton of issues with this except for your continued assumptions that the Spurs' defense is essentially irrelevant in this series.



This is what EVERY chicken-little person says. That's what timvp said about Memphis 2013. It's what a lot of people said about OKC in 2014. Giving box-score and 2K analysis doesn't somehow make your opinion objective and more sound.



Nope. Not betting that the Spurs beat Houston in a series either.



I don't be on what other people do. And I think you're desperately trying to save face after you've had so many threads go bad on you recently (including some where I've been on your side).

---

Chinook going hard. :lol

midnightpulp is a troll guys. Never been right on anything. Dude is going up the "Top 10 Worst Posters on ST". :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

midnightpulp is a troll guys. Never been right on anything. Dude is going up the "Top 10 Worst Posters on ST". :lmao

---

Can you summarize his points though? The whole debate is about what to conclude from limited evidence. They are fighting over whether the spurs have a 30,40, or 50% chance at a seven games series. This is hardly a cat fight. You're over stimulated from the game deebom, try taking a nap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by K...

Can you summarize his points though? The whole debate is about what to conclude from limited evidence. They are fighting over whether the spurs have a 30,40, or 50% chance at a seven games series. This is hardly a cat fight. You're over stimulated from the game deebom, try taking a nap.

---

It's an issue with him. Adderall and his helmet do help, though.

You are a subtle troll. Nice try. :lmao

I don't think people read midfaggot now and expect top notch analysis. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

I don't think people read midfaggot now and expect top notch analysis. :lol

---

I don't think anyone reads you :lol

Except for me, since I like toying with retards. See my (one sided) battles with Kool, your Godfather, over the years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

I don't think anyone reads you :lol

Except for me, since I like toying with retards. See my (one sided) battles with Kool, your Godfather, over the years.

---

This isn't going like you expected faggot. Everyone can clearly see your own contradictions. I don't need to say shit. :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

This isn't going like you expected faggot. Everyone can clearly see your own contradictions. I don't need to say shit. :lmao

---

Point out the contradictions. I'll wait.

Acting like I haven't already. Wow. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

It might just not be enough though. That's entirely plausible due to a number of factors:

1) Warriors are a top 5 defensive team themselves.
2) The whistle can largely dictate how much D you can really play, especially on the road. HCA might be enough of a difference.
3) They're much more of a "complete" product than the Spurs at this point.

I still think Kerr would rather play any other team than the Spurs in a playoff series, but that doesn't mean there's fear or anything like that. If we were to play a series against them right now, I would think they would still be favored.

---

It's amazing how Chinook doesn't grasp this simple point.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=256116&page=9

:lmao

Chinook and Midnightpulp is interesting debate...

But Chinook is winning this battle for sure

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=256116&page=9

:lmao

---

Tony being held to a relatively low scoring night resulted in 87 big points. 87 big points isn't enough to beat the Warriors in the post-season. So I was proven right about him needing to be that additional scorer. We can't trust Patty House and his 3 point efforts.

But at least Tony was d-ing up while Patty was losing his battle with Barb:lolsa. So he surprised me in proving his worth in other ways :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

Tony being held to a relatively low scoring night resulted in 87 big points. 87 big points isn't enough to beat the Warriors in the post-season. So I was proven right about him needing to be that additional scorer. We can trust Patty House and his 3 point efforts.

But at least Tony was d-ing up while Patty was losing his battle with Barb:lolsa. So he surprised me in proving his worth in other ways :tu

---

We won with Tony scoring 6 points. Proved you wrong already faggot. Go read your posts. :lmao

I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

Tony being held to a relatively low scoring night resulted in 87 big points. 87 big points isn't enough to beat the Warriors in the post-season. So I was proven right about him needing to be that additional scorer. We can't trust Patty House and his 3 point efforts.

But at least Tony was d-ing up while Patty was losing his battle with Barb:lolsa. So he surprised me in proving his worth in other ways :tu

---

87pts is enough when the opponent scores 79pts..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coachmac87

Chinook and Midnightpulp is interesting debate...

But Chinook is winning this battle for sure

---

He actually has no argument since he didn't clearly state a premise. I don't even really know what or why he's debating. I gather he thinks the Spurs defense can equalize the Warriors' offense, but nothing really suggests that it can long term.

Methinks he just kneejerks when people don't have deluded homer opinions about his beloved Spurs, and Danny Green specifically.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coachmac87

I


87pts is enough when the opponent scores 79pts..

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

He actually has no argument since he didn't clearly state a premise. I don't even really know what or why he's debating. I gather he thinks the Spurs defense can equalize the Warriors' offense, but nothing really suggests that it can long term.

Methinks he just kneejerks when people don't have deluded homer opinions about his beloved Spurs, and Danny Green specifically.

---

You use the promise that the Spurs can't keep that Spurs defense, but you expect the Warriors to keep their offense. WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW. :lmao


:lmao


























:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

We won with Tony scoring 6 points. Proved you wrong already faggot. Go read your posts. :lmao

---

Cool. I'll be sure to tune to watch the Spurs in the Finals next week.

Oh, wait.

:lol thinking 87 points will be enough to win a playoff series against them.

I'd love to bet you, as well, but you're obviously cut from the welcher cloth, much like your godfather.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

Tony being held to a relatively low scoring night resulted in 87 big points. 87 big points isn't enough to beat the Warriors in the post-season. So I was proven right about him needing to be that additional scorer. We can't trust Patty House and his 3 point efforts.

But at least Tony was d-ing up while Patty was losing his battle with Barb:lolsa. So he surprised me in proving his worth in other ways :tu

---

Dude, let it go. You don't have to go around stamping out fires. It's obvious we need Tony. Is obvious we need "the others" too. In reality Tony's inconsistency makes him one of the others.

Does this faggot ever think? :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

He actually has no argument since he didn't clearly state a premise. I don't even really know what or why he's debating. I gather he thinks the Spurs defense can equalize the Warriors' offense, but nothing really suggests that it can long term.

Methinks he just kneejerks when people don't have deluded homer opinions about his beloved Spurs, and Danny Green specifically.

---

You use the premise that the Spurs can't keep that Spurs defense, but you expect the Warriors to keep their offense. WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW. :lmao


:lmao


























:lol


:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabom

You use the promise that the Spurs can't keep that Spurs defense, but you expect the Warriors to keep their offense. WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW. :lmao


:lmao


























:lol

---

There you go again, forgetting how to read.

The Warriors won't average 115 points per against the Spurs, but the Spurs ain't holding them to 92 points, either.

Equalize means can the Spurs play good enough defense relative to their own offense to beat Golden State in a series?

I say no. And I'm not going to continue to humor you until you honestly answer that question. Time to step up with a take.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnightpulp

He actually has no argument since he didn't clearly state a premise. I don't even really know what or why he's debating. I gather he thinks the Spurs defense can equalize the Warriors' offense, but nothing really suggests that it can long term.

Methinks he just kneejerks when people don't have deluded homer opinions about his beloved Spurs, and Danny Green specifically.

---

You can look at it any way you want..but Spurs defense is becoming a problem...

Holding any team to under 80pts is impressive these days..but the Warriors??? You've already stated how great Steph and Klay are at scoring the ball..

What needs to happen for you to be confident?? 30pt blow outs??