Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kikoluna
Mavs Is not automatic. Historically they give us good battles.
Historically, yes. But if Dirk doesn't go for 30 or 40 on a lights out night, I think we're probably fine. No Monta to kill us. It's good we have the Pacers in the rearview :lmao:
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Don't worry, Dublets. The mighty Wolves are just too good.
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurtacular
That game is for 41-0 imo; the game vs. the Monta-less Mavs should be a formality unless Mavs are playing for a s six seed or something.
Mavs is in Dallas, GS and OKC are what stand between the Spurs and 41-0.
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DrunkTXLabrat
wolves
Re: Celtics, Blazers, Wolves, Spurs, Grizzlies. In that order.
Dang. Spurs would've been more fun if the Warriors streak was still going. I think they would've played for pride. We'll never know for sure.