I'm sorry but the spurs is going to get 2001nd by the warriors

:(

2001 lakers all over again

:(

Yeah a 67 win team is going to get swept. Something that has never happened before in NBA history.

Faggot OP covering all his bases.

it is a possibility, tbh...Spurs offensive troubles in this matchup are pretty alarming.

Bad omen: the last 60+ win team to get swept by another +60 win team was the 1996 Magic (60-22) by 1996 Bulls (72-10) :cry

Agreed. You are sorry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Faggot OP covering all his bases.

---

I thought it'd be GSW's offense to do the trick, not the defense, but here we are.

Bruh, 2001 Spurs were the equivalent of the 2007 Cavs.:lol

Besides, the Duds are more similar to the 2010 Suns than '01 Lakers.

You really need to work on your thread titles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

:(

2001 lakers all over again

:(

---

Laker fan troll doing her thing...

Spoken like a true fake fan.

Op is a faggot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tully365

You really need to work on your thread titles.

---

I think it's part of his shtick tbh.

No shit Sherlock.

No shame in losing to a 73 win team that has pretty much every position a matchup advantage vs you.

No shame at all.

If spurs can get to WCFs and win two games vs worriers. I'll be a happy camper.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spursistan

it is a possibility, tbh...Spurs offensive troubles in this matchup are pretty alarming.

Bad omen: the last 60+ win team to get swept by another +60 win team was the 1996 Magic (60-22) by 1996 Bulls (72-10) :cry

---

The sonics won 64 games and lost in 6 to the bulls. You guys are reaching in the sense that when it comes to nba history no team that has won 64 plus games has ever been swept. I don't see the spurs making that type of history.

Spurs are basically a 70 win team, considering they coasted to end the regular season.

With that kind of dominance in a season, I still wonder if the league has become that top heavy, or the Spurs are just unlucky that they have such a good team and will likely get outmatched by a 6'3" PG who just has too much range.

OP was a baby in 2001

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thispego

OP was a zica baby in 2001

---

Fify

Vanilla

Getting swept <> getting 2001 Lakers'd

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...71/027/d6a.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thispego

OP was a baby in 2001

---

And acts like one in 2016

So Lamarcus Aldridge is going to be taken out by a flagrant 2 before the Spurs meet the Warriors?

lol our #2 option isn't Derek fucking Anderson anymore so I think we'll be fine. some of y'all are such weenies :lol

Pop's been keeping the Warriors secret formula bottled all season...I feels it.

Let's hope they both make it that far! I feel an early upset brewing...Houston are gonna give GS a bit of trouble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones

Pop's been keeping the Warriors secret formula bottled all season...I feels it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Russo21

Let's hope they both make it that far! I feel an early upset brewing...Houston are gonna give GS a bit of trouble.

---

The Clippers have been playing pretty damn good too. I could see them fucking the Warriors up.

Should the Spurs forfeit?

Spurs in 6. I've already run the statistics and metric analysis.

There is also a 42% probability that LAC takes out the Warriors. So we might be looking at a rematch from last season.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dex

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...71/027/d6a.jpg

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones

Pop's been keeping the Warriors secret formula bottled all season...I feels it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tmtcsc

The Clippers have been playing pretty damn good too. I could see them fucking the Warriors up.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpursforSix

Spurs in 6. I've already run the statistics and metric analysis.

There is also a 42% probability that LAC takes out the Warriors. So we might be looking at a rematch from last season.

---

:bobo

Not that bad, but I expect warriors in 6.

It would suck, but I'm prepared for it. The Warriors are far past the point I thought they would start breaking down. Jump-shooting teams simply don't last like this. They've made a deal with the devil and there's nothing to be done. My question is how many games they actually lose in the POs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kawhitstorm

Bruh, 2001 Spurs were the equivalent of the 2007 Cavs.:lol

Besides, the Duds are more similar to the 2010 Suns than '01 Lakers.

---

they're coming off a chip and their best player is playing at an all time level. pretty 01 lakers-like

Only 10(?) number 2 seeds have ever won the NBA championship.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peacemaker885

Only 10(?) number 2 seeds have ever one the NBA championship.

---

How many have ever twoed it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peacemaker885

Only 10(?) number 2 seeds have ever won the NBA championship.

---

How man 2 seeds won 67 games or went 40-1 at home?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BillMc

How man 2 seeds won 67 games or went 40-1 at home?

---

Pretty sure Spurs are the only one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BillMc

How man 2 seeds won 67 games or went 40-1 at home?

---

Good point. 67 wins usually gets you the #1 seed.

are*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peacemaker885

Pretty sure Spurs are the only one.

---

The only other team to accomplish both of those were the #1 seed in the east and won the NBA title. (Celtics)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TXstbobcat

The only other team to accomplish both of those were the #1 seed in the east and won the NBA title. (Celtics)

---

So if we're basically the 86 Celtics, one of the greatest teams of all time, YET we have a better point differential and defense than they did (I think, haven't confirmed this) I think we should be confident. Not overly so - that's a fantastic Warriors team - but they are NOT invincible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

they're coming off a chip and their best player is playing at an all time level. pretty 01 lakers-like

---

If you are going to go that route then they are more similar to the '92 Bulls as that might have been their ACTUAL best squad (rather than '96) since Jordan was at his PEAK. Plus, Jordan/Pippen/Horace are more comparable to Curry/Klay/Draymond than Shaq/Kobe along w/ being a small team w/ dominant perimeter players like the Duds.

Coach: Phil Jackson (67-15)PTS/G: 109.9 (5th of 27) ▪ Opp PTS/G: 99.5 (3rd of 27)
SRS: 10.07 (1st of 27) ▪ Pace: 94.4 (22nd of 27)
Off Rtg: 115.5 (1st of 27) ▪ Def Rtg: 104.5 (4th of 27)
Expected W-L: 66-16 (1st of 27)

Coach: Steve Kerr (73-9)PTS/G: 114.9 (1st of 30) ▪ Opp PTS/G: 104.1 (19th of 30)
SRS: 10.38 (1st of 30) ▪ Pace: 99.3 (2nd of 30)
Off Rtg: 114.5 (1st of 30) ▪ Def Rtg: 103.8 (5th of 30)
Expected W-L: 65-17 (2nd of 30)

Those Bulls were pushed to 7 games by the Knicks b/c Ewing feasted on their frontline:

OP I've seen you slip in and out of piss poor english so I know you're a bullshitter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

OP I've seen you slip in and out of piss poor english so I know you're a bullshitter.

---

Supposedly he went back to his native country so he had his excellent Canadian manners devolved by the rough South Asian cultures.

Gotta have a lil faith mang.
https://i.imgur.com/567v8pw.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/5cQONG1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .G.

Gotta have a lil faith mang.
https://i.imgur.com/567v8pw.jpg

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .G.

Gotta have a lil faith mang.
https://i.imgur.com/567v8pw.jpg

---

Dude, that's my house/pic :lol wtf.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spur|n|Austin

Dude, that's my house/pic :lol wtf.

---

No shit?
Fuckit :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I. Hustle

How many have ever twoed it?

---

Haha. You gotta dumb it down though ... went over everyone's heads.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leetonidas

lol our #2 option isn't Derek fucking Anderson anymore so I think we'll be fine. some of y'all are such weenies :lol

---

The Spurs didn't have Anderson after game 1 of the second round.

I realize that, my point being the Spurs have a much better team overall than the 2001 squad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Keepin' it real

And acts like one in 2016

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .G.

No shit?
Fuckit :lol

---

fuggin reddit ey?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spur|n|Austin

fuggin reddit ey?

---

Yessum

A lot of the analysts over at ESPN, NBA.com and CBS Sports have the spurs not even making the WCF, they all think it's OKC/Warriors so OKC would get 2001nd by the warriors.

No one thought the New York Giants had a chance against the undefeated New England Patriots, but they won.

No one thought the Detroit Pistons had a chance against the 2004 LA Lakers with 4 HOF starters.

No one thought 8th seed Denver Nuggets had a chance against the 1st seed Seattle Supersonics in 94

San Antonio is old, but SA is smart, and deep and the best defensive team in the NBA, by a long shot. More importantly, SA is built for the playoffs and GSW is not.

Let's hope this is like Memphis in 6 thread tbh

I expect a great series. 6 or 7 games. We will see..

Spurs need to worry about OKC first....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpursforSix

Spurs in 6. I've already run the statistics and metric analysis.

There is also a 42% probability that LAC takes out the Warriors. So we might be looking at a rematch from last season.

---

I can see the Clippers upsetting the Warriors too...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ibleedslvrnblk

Spurs need to worry about OKC first....

---

:bobo Actually the Grizz...then OKC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dex

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...71/027/d6a.jpg

---

:lol

If there's anything that should give Spurs fans hope, it's the playoff version of Klay Thompson, tbh:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daslicer

Yeah a 67 win team is going to get swept. Something that has never happened before in NBA history.

---

No one has ever gone against a 73 in team either.

Been saying it all year, I'm not as scared of the Warriors as other people are. Yes they are phenomenal, but I want to see them deal with real playoff pressure going against a team that is disciplined to ball out for 48 minutes of every game.

Sure they have the better weapons, but the Spurs are like a veteran boxer that's taking your best punches and still punching back strategically to land but also take you to deep waters into the late rounds. If the Warriors can still beat them, then I tip my cap. Until then, I've still got my reservations.

Now, Warriorefs is the gorilla in the room.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMX7

No one has ever gone against a 73 in team either.

---

Right and you honestly believe the Spurs are going to get swept? I just don't see that happening because again I will go with historic odds and repeat what I said which is "No team in NBA history that has won 64 plus games has ever been swept." I can't see the spurs making that type of history. Teams that get swept usually don't have a competitive spirit or the talent to compete. Spurs have both of these things in spades so I don't see the Warriors sweeping. If the Spurs lose it will be in 6 or 7.

Everyone thought that was gonna be a classic series.I still remember watching awful NBA2nite show host by Fred Carter and he said "This series destined for 7 games", but a lot of people felt that way,including Spurs fans.The Spurs were playing great basketball entering that series.

Referring to 2001 WCF bloodbath.

Will be interesting to see who from SA really wants to win. Who will be physical, who will bring the intensity, besides Manu?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

:(

2001 lakers all over again

:(

---

FUCK OFF!!!

This Warriors team couldn't carry the '01 Lakers' jock. They at their absolute best would sweep us at out absolute worse. This one goes at least 6.