Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Cleveland will be boring, business as usual.
Philadelphia will be the entertainment, might need to call in the national guard for that :tu
Bernard keeps talking about a contested convention but every hour that talking point is looking less and less likely.
Your grandma won the Virgin Island last night. Bernie didn't even meet the 15% threshold and tonight is looking like he'll lose Puerto Rico which has 60 delegates up for grabs.
They're saying that she's now within 25 delegates of reaching 2383. With superdelegates that is.
Bernie's arguement is full of holes. He says he will flip all of your grandma's superdelegates and make them his. Therefore ignoring the popular vote and pledge delegates. :lol
06-05-2016
Mitch
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
Bernard keeps talking about a contested convention but every hour that talking point is looking less and less likely.
Your grandma won the Virgin Island last night. Bernie didn't even meet the 15% threshold and tonight is looking like he'll lose Puerto Rico which has 60 delegates up for grabs.
They're saying that she's now within 25 delegates of reaching 2383. With superdelegates that is.
Bernie's arguement is full of holes. He says he will flip all of your grandma's superdelegates and make them his. Therefore ignoring the popular vote and pledge delegates. :lol
Technically, it is going to be a contested convention unless Hillary gets the pledged delegates she needs from California. If you need to give her superdelegates it will be contested, but if she wins on the first ballot they avoid a brokered convention. A little bit of semantics, but it is what it is - Bernie isn't wrong that it will be contested, but he is wrong if it means he has a chance.
06-05-2016
Reck
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Technically, it is going to be a contested convention unless Hillary gets the pledged delegates she needs from California. If you need to give her superdelegates it will be contested, but if she wins on the first ballot they avoid a brokered convention. A little bit of semantics, but it is what it is - Bernie isn't wrong that it will be contested, but he is wrong if it means he has a chance.
None will have the the necessary pledge delegates. I think she'll be somewhere like 150-200 pledge delegates short.
Obama needed the help of superdelegates to get to the number. I dont remember the last time a democratic candidate got the whole amount of pledge delegates without the super. Maybe you can fill me in on that.
You cant constest something if you dont have the number. I'm confused by that logic. Specially when your only hope is to win over 70% of the vote plus flipping 400+ superdelegates.
I dont know, man.
06-05-2016
Mitch
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reck
None will have the the necessary pledge delegates. I think she'll be somewhere like 150-200 pledge delegates short.
Obama needed the help of superdelegates to get to the number. I dont remember the last time a democratic candidate got the whole amount of pledge delegates without the super. Maybe you can fill me in on that.
You cant constest something if you dont have the number. I'm confused by that logic. Specially when your only hope is to win over 70% of the vote plus flipping 400+ superdelegates.
I dont know, man.
Probably John Kerry in 2004, he won almost every state. It's just semantics, Reck, the term contested convention means you don't have a de-facto winner like Trump will be. It's not really a big deal, I don't know why Bernie thinks he will somehow get almost all the unbounds. I think he's just using the term to keep his base hopeful, I guess. It will not be brokered, though.
06-05-2016
Dirk Oneanddoneski
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
This one is 16 minutes with a lot of new footage
06-06-2016
Quetzal-X
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Oneanddoneski
This one is 16 minutes with a lot of new footage
:lolYou niggaz see how Jacob ran down Esau at 4:30 with that superior burst of takedown speed? :lol
2 Esdras 6:9
“For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth.”
:claw:fro:claw
06-06-2016
boutons_deux
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
... TSA freaks out about, ridiculous lefty political dissent and/or violence, which is promoted, congratulated by which non-Repug presidential wannabe?
by which leading Dems?
06-06-2016
rmt
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Good thing this stuff wasn't going on when I went to the Trump rally here. I went alone while hubby took kids to church.
06-06-2016
TheSanityAnnex
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
... TSA freaks out about, ridiculous lefty political dissent and/or violence, which is promoted, congratulated by which non-Repug presidential wannabe?
by which leading Dems?
Do you label gang killings left wing since the overwhelming majority of them are Democrats?
06-06-2016
pgardn
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
... TSA freaks out about, ridiculous lefty political dissent and/or violence, which is promoted, congratulated by which non-Repug presidential wannabe?
by which leading Dems?
You reply with this boots?
Just denounce the punks trying to make trouble taking cheap shots at people from behind.
Then go on about the subject above in another section.
You saw the video, denounce the punks as cowards. You think these cowards are going to vote for Bernie?
I can't stand Trump, but no excuses or misdirect necessary for this behavior.
You are as chicken shit as they are with your misdirect.
06-06-2016
boutons_deux
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex
Do you label gang killings left wing since the overwhelming majority of them are Democrats?
gang killings aren't are political terrorism, dumbfuck. violent gang members vote? :lol
06-06-2016
boutons_deux
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgardn
You reply with this boots?
Just denounce the punks trying to make trouble taking cheap shots at people from behind.
Then go on about the subject above in another section.
You saw the video, denounce the punks as cowards. You think these cowards are going to vote for Bernie?
I can't stand Trump, but no excuses or misdirect necessary for this behavior.
You are as chicken shit as they are with your misdirect.
That's total of people KILLED by rightwingnuts.
How many dead people from lefties over the same period?
your game and your shit is pitifully weak.
06-06-2016
SpursforSix
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
That's total of people KILLED by rightwingnuts.
How many dead people from lefties over the same period?
your game and your shit is pitifully weak.
How many humans has Kim Jong Un murdered?
06-06-2016
boutons_deux
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpursforSix
How many humans has Kim Jong Un murdered?
:lol Is he American? :lol Is he a lefty? :lol
goddam, you rightwingnuts got some really weak shit
06-06-2016
SpursforSix
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
:lol Is he American? :lol Is he a lefty? :lol
goddam, you rightwingnuts got some really weak shit
How many? I'm waiting.
06-06-2016
TheSanityAnnex
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
... TSA freaks out about, ridiculous lefty political dissent and/or violence, which is promoted, congratulated by which non-Repug presidential wannabe?
by which leading Dems?
Your list needs some revisions
Neo-nazi James von Brunn, the US Holocaust Museum shooter, June 2009, has been labelled a "right-wing" terrorist, and no doubt many vaguely think of him as a "Christian" terrorist.
In fact, he could just as easily be called a "left-wing" terrorist: He hated Israel, opposed the Iraq War, thought 9/11 was an inside job, hated Fox News, hated neo-cons, hated Bush and McCain, and finally he hated Christianity, and said he was a socialist (the Nazis were collectivists).
He referred to "the insane teachings of Jesus", and said the gospels are: "stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation - a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep - he named his hoax "Christianity." ... "Christianity" destroyed Roman Civilization." So he is not a Christian terrorist.
Andrew Joseph Stack, the perpetrator of the Austin tax office suicide attack in Feb 2010, has been labelled a "right-wing" terrorist.
He is a convert to Islam, and said in the threats that he was: "a local Muslim terrorist on a roll." A witness says that he: "called himself a mujahedeen".
Acts 17 Apologetics point out that some people rushed to call him a "Christian" terrorist, and the local Police Chief even said: "He picked Dearborn as a stop because of the huge Arab and Muslim population." When in fact he picked a Shia Muslim mosque because he was a Sunni Muslim.
In a similar phenomenon to the Tucson blood libel against Sarah Palin, people even accused Acts 17 Apologetics of inciting the attack! They have a lovely response: "It seems that our hate speech (i.e. drawing attention to disturbing facts about Islam, while maintaining our love for Muslims) somehow caused the Sunni-Shia split. Perhaps Jem believes that Nabeel and I constructed an Acts 17 time machine, travelled back to 632 and caused division in the Muslim community right after Muhammad died. Perhaps I went to Abu Bakr and said, "Hey! You should be leader!" Then Nabeel went to Ali and said, "You're better than Abu Bakr!" Fourteen centuries later, the division we caused led a Sunni convert to attack a mosque. Acts 17 must be even craftier than we thought!"
A friend said about him: "He was more of a liberal type; he wasn't happy with the former [Bush] administration. He was more happy with this [the Obama] administration -- as far as presidential administrations."
Of course, primarily he was mentally ill.
But don't you think that if he was a Tea Party supporter, all hell would have broken loose?
It also emerged that the shooter created a webpage with the name "Mohammed Salem", though there is no evidence he was Muslim.
Max Fisher gives an account of a horrific anti-Muslim crime in Dec 2014: "In December, a man in Kansas City wrote on his SUV that the Koran was a "disease worse than Ebola," then drove it into a 15-year-old Muslim boy in front of a local mosque, severing his legs and killing him."
However, it emerged that the shooter was a left-wing atheist who hated the GOP and was a fan of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Max Fisher portrays the murder of Ahmed Al-Jumaili in Texas in Mar 2015 as an anti-Muslim hate crime.
However, it seems the killer was a gangsta black teenager.
06-06-2016
TheSanityAnnex
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
No one should justify violence. But to try to call out one side without stating the obvious facts of violence at trump rallies committed by scared little white people who are only brave in crowds like fellow inbreds (see op, cocksucker, retard and the rest) has not only been far more prevalent but actually encouraged by the assumed new leader of the repub party is cowardly.
Congratulations on finally actually trying to contribute to the topic. Please back your claim that the violence has been far more prevalent by Trump supporters...best of luck!
06-06-2016
TheSanityAnnex
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
False equivalence, typical rightwingnut bullshit of "can't defend our right wing assholes, so let's pull down the non-rightwingers"
... TSA freaks out about, ridiculous lefty political dissent and/or violence, which is promoted, congratulated by which non-Repug presidential wannabe?
by which leading Dems?
06-06-2016
Mitch
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Botox Deuce, being a moron like usual.
06-06-2016
CosmicCowboy
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
Lol. You are dedicated. Clinging to the brain that does your thinking.
I have no need to get drug into the mud where you exist out of fear. Incendiary rhetoric by your masters has contributed to all of these recorded incididents. But you choose to try to blur the argument about what pieces of shit you cocksucker retard etc are for being so dependent on others to think.
It's like you're running the standard "right" playbook, willfully ignore, distract, and deflect real life so the stupidest of the stupid lap it up like retarded hogs at the inbred trough. Seriously kill yourselves.
In other words, you can't back it up and are too big of a pussy to admit it.
We get it.
Tired ass Shtick.
06-06-2016
TheSanityAnnex
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnerific
Lol. You are dedicated. Clinging to the brain that does your thinking.
I have no need to get drug into the mud where you exist out of fear. Incendiary rhetoric by your masters has contributed to all of these recorded incididents. But you choose to try to blur the argument about what pieces of shit you cocksucker retard etc are for being so dependent on others to think.
It's like you're running the standard "right" playbook, willfully ignore, distract, and deflect real life so the stupidest of the stupid lap it up like retarded hogs at the inbred trough. Seriously kill yourselves.
All your tough talk and you are going to scamper away like a little bitch? You claimed that violence at Trump rallies, by Trump supporters was far more prevalent. Back your claim big guy.
"But to try to call out one side without stating the obvious facts of violence at trump rallies committed by scared little white people who are only brave in crowds like fellow inbreds (see op, cocksucker, retard and the rest) has not only been far more prevalent but actually encouraged by the assumed new leader of the repub party is cowardly."
06-06-2016
Quetzal-X
Re: Why aren't we having a National conversation about Leftist violence?
As long as the racist portion of honkeys keep swillin' n' pillin' its good all aroun for humanity tbqfh
