What's our record without Parker?

Any top 50 guard would have provided the same shit. Its really mpre so that Green is playing now. And the fact that Laprivitolla plays when Porker is out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DAF86

Losing to Brazil in Brazil is expected, tbh. Specially with a coach that should be retired.

---

Argentina was all round bad in that game.. change of guards bro.. time of Messi is over..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gilmor

Argentina was all round bad in that game.. change of guards bro.. time of Messi is over..

---

Argentina was bad but it wasn't because of Messi. Messi is still clearly the best player in the World son. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DAF86

Argentina was bad but it wasn't because of Messi. Messi is still clearly the best player in the World son. :lol

---

No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apalisoc_9

Any top 50 guard would have provided the same shit. Its really mpre so that Green is playing now. And the fact that Laprivitolla plays when Porker is out.

---

we were winning without Green, can't say the same without Parker. He's the head of the snake after all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 313

we were winning without Green, can't say the same without Parker. He's the head of the snake after all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brazil

Also a dude that is struggling without him is Aldridge tbh, Parker just spoon feed him on offense pretty much all the time

---

Another shitty game.

'but but Parker makes him better' :cry :cry

5-13 tonight

These Parker fans...:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YGWHI

Another shitty game.

'but but Parker makes him better' :cry :cry

5-13 tonight

These Parker fans...:lmao

---

Still better than 3-13 against the Clippers & 5-18 against the Pistons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht

Still better than 3-13 against the Clippers & 5-18 against the Pistons

---

Do the math, stupid troll.

5-13 against Kings

4-13 against Pels

5-15 against Rockets

6-14 against Pistons

5-13 against Rockets

5 shitty shooting games vs only 2 is still better??

:lmao



'but Parker makes him better' :cry :cry

:lmao

2-0 against Houston WITH Parker
0-1 against Houston WITHOUT Parker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

they are 7 new players hello
also tp has to adjust to the 7 new players and everyone with them
the head of the snake is missing and it makes leonard and others do more

---

special needs.

this thread :lol

spurs with parker: 17-4... but don't give him too much credit for victories, he shot 0 for 6 in two of them and had 1 assist in two of them as well

spurs without parker: 7-2... the two losses were against a fully healthy clipper team and the rockets (a game which we lost by 2)

if parker sat out the next two games and the spurs win, then our record without parker would be better than our record with him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gambit1990

this thread :lol

spurs with parker: 17-4... but don't give him too much credit for victories, he shot 0 for 6 in two of them and had 1 assist in two of them as well

spurs without parker: 7-2... the two losses were against a fully healthy clipper team and the rockets (a game which we lost by 2)

if parker sat out the next two games and the spurs win, then our record without parker would be better than our record with him.

---

Truth bomb.

what's really funny is that parker fans are kawhi haters... and they want to chalk up our record to tony when it's kawhi who's been doing the heavy lifting.

Bump just because Spurs record with Parker is pretty damn impressive

our record without parker was so important that parker fans had to make a thread about it?

spurs winning % with parker: 77.42
spurs winning % without parker: 77.78

spurs winning % with patty: 79.49
spurs winning % without patty: 77.5

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 313

Just curious..

---

without parker the spurs are .818
with parker the spurs are .781

is there a point you were trying to make OP?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

It's not good tbh

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheGreatYacht

Spurs CLEARLY missing the head of the snake. Aren't even a .500 team without him.

What the fuck do these armchair GM's know tbh

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nathan89

Murray is a couple years away from being 3rd string caliber.

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gambit1990

:lmao

---

He was bad but now I very excited about his potential.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gambit1990

without parker the spurs are .818
with parker the spurs are .781

is there a point you were trying to make OP?

---

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gambit1990

our record without parker was so important that parker fans had to make a thread about it?

spurs winning % with parker: 77.42
spurs winning % without parker: 77.78

spurs winning % with patty: 79.49
spurs winning % without patty: 77.5

---

Patty was fucking awful tonight. thank god for murray

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 313

Patty was fucking awful tonight. thank god for murray

---

^ elite poster

Spurs got blown out in Cleveland last season with Porker. Just saying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FkLA

Spurs got blown out in Cleveland last season with Porker. Just saying.

---

:wow

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FkLA

Spurs got blown out in Cleveland last season with Porker. Just saying.

---

Mills was 2-6 for 4 points and 2 assists in 21 minutes in that game. Much worse than Parker, just saying