-
Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Hand grenades and horseshoes . . .
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
That's nice and all, but would he have been worth it, tbh?
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Russ
Hand grenades and horseshoes . . .
.....and nuclear warheads
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Of course a pairing of Kawhi and Durant would have been awesome and in my opinion more unstoppable that GSW w/ Durant. That said, GSW became the most hated team and people will debate the legitimacy of any title they win and will call them failures for any year they don't win a title. So probably good he didn't come.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Of course we were...
Here is the full list in order:
Dubs
Spurs
Cavs
Thunder
Clippers
...this lazy motherfucker just printed out the overall 15/16 standings, as he wanted to get the easiest ring possible.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty20
That's nice and all, but would he have been worth it, tbh?
Of course.
The Spurs probably can't afford Gasol with Durant on board. But a starting lineup of Parker, Leonard, Durant, Aldridge, and Lee/Dedmon doesn't look too shabby.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cd98
Of course a pairing of Kawhi and Durant would have been awesome and in my opinion more unstoppable that GSW w/ Durant. That said, GSW became the most hated team and people will debate the legitimacy of any title they win and will call them failures for any year they don't win a title. So probably good he didn't come.
Being called failures in the years they don't win won't stop em from being pretty damn happy with the years they do win.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
If Golden State had won the NBA Finals last year, Durant would be in a Spurs uniform right now.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Ofc we were the 2nd seed :lol but niglet hates kawhi so who knows
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lefty20
That's nice and all, but would he have been worth it, tbh?
Of course. The Warriors nuked their depth to get him and it was worth it, hard to imagine the same not being true for the Spurs.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
LOL...Clippers. They needed an elite SF more than any other team of the list but those locker room issues..
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
I was saying to a friend of mine, I didn't want the Warriors to win last season as I hated their over-celebrating, so I went back and forth throughout that whole series on who I wanted to win. I picked Cleveland as the lesser of two evils, but I didn't want them winning either because I thought that opened the door for Durant to Goldenstate. I had no idea he was that serious about coming to the Spurs. I thought we would have been third on the list behind OKC, Goldenstate and then the Spurs as a long shot.
Now that he left, it's pretty obvious to me that he wanted out of OKC because of Westbrook. They just weren't the best of friends. I should have went for Goldenstate, but I had no idea the Spurs were even in the running. I thought he'd stay in OKC.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ice009
I was saying to a friend of mine, I didn't want the Warriors to win last season as I hated their over-celebrating, so I went back and forth throughout that whole series on who I wanted to win. I picked Cleveland as the lesser of two evils, but I didn't want them winning either because I thought that opened the door for Durant to Goldenstate. I had no idea he was that serious about coming to the Spurs. I thought we would have been third on the list behind OKC, Goldenstate and then the Spurs as a long shot.
Now that he left, it's pretty obvious to me that he wanted out of OKC because of Westbrook. They just weren't the best of friends. I should have went for Goldenstate, but I had no idea the Spurs were even in the running. I thought he'd stay in OKC.
The Warriors, and Raymond especially, have been tampering all of last season. The Spurs may have been a consideration, but I doubt it was even close.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Dublettes lost to the Heatles :lol
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Thank God..Would rather the spurs not have his bitch ass..
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Uriel
If Golden State had won the NBA Finals last year, Durant would be in a Spurs uniform right now.
He has indeed said 'no way' he would go to GSW if they won the title, which goes to show how insecure and stupid Durant is.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mudyez
Of course we were...
Here is the full list in order:
Dubs
Spurs
Cavs
Thunder
Clippers
...this lazy motherfucker just printed out the overall 15/16 standings, as he wanted to get the easiest ring possible.
:lol
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Durbeta can suck my ****.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mudyez
Of course we were...
Here is the full list in order:
Dubs
Spurs
Cavs
Thunder
Clippers
...this lazy motherfucker just printed out the overall 15/16 standings, as he wanted to get the easiest ring possible.
:lol
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
I still haven't heard whether or not Kawhi was at the recruiting meeting? If he wasn't, then I do think Kawhi didn't really want him on the team due to his comments about Kawhi.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daledondale
Durbeta can suck my ****.
:bobo
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ice009
I still haven't heard whether or not Kawhi was at the recruiting meeting? If he wasn't, then I do think Kawhi didn't really want him on the team due to his comments about Kawhi.
He was with his GF who was giving birth to his kid, I think.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Most times Spurs are #2 ... I would have liked KD in SA ...
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Snaq O'Meal
Of course.
The Spurs probably can't afford Gasol with Durant on board. But a starting lineup of Parker, Leonard, Durant, Aldridge, and Lee/Dedmon doesn't look too shabby.
Tony Parker couldnt stop that lineup if he tried
Hed definitely try too
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mudyez
Of course we were...
Here is the full list in order:
Dubs
Spurs
Cavs
Thunder
Clippers
...this lazy motherfucker just printed out the overall 15/16 standings, as he wanted to get the easiest ring possible.
:lol
Basically wanted to get his ass carried. Looking at that list I'm convinced he still would have joined the Warriors if they won the championship. The only question would have been whether the Warriors would make the moves to get him after B2B titles.
In order of personal glory Thunder>Clippers>Spurs>Cavs>Warriors
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
It's BS. He only says that because he knows how much respect the entire league has for the Spurs and Popovich. He hates Leonard and everyone knows it.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fireball
Most times Spurs are #2 ... I would have liked KD in SA ...
Apparently, Spurs are like that great girl that's good for you, but it's kinda boring so you never pick her, then tell your friends you should have.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rasuo214
:lol
Basically wanted to get his ass carried. Looking at that list I'm convinced he still would have joined the Warriors if they won the championship. The only question would have been whether the Warriors would make the moves to get him after B2B titles.
In order of personal glory Thunder>Clippers>Spurs>Cavs>Warriors
It's a technicality anyway. Warriors could and should have won the Finals. They were fully equipped to be a championship and were improved from the previous season. Actual title or not didn't make much difference.
I don't blame him for getting away from WB. But they did almost reach the Finals and choked.
I think Durant just knows asterisks and analysis don't speak louder than a ring. Whatever ridiculous super team you put together, if you won you won. You can still take credit as the best player. Lebron set up the precedent for that.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NameLess Scrub
I think Durant just knows asterisks and analysis don't speak louder than a ring. Whatever ridiculous super team you put together, if you won you won. You can still take credit as the best player. Lebron set up the precedent for that.
Eh, I don't see too many similarities with what LeBron did, unless you just mean Durant made a move as a free agent (which applies to everyone).
LeBron went to a Heat team that was either outside of the playoffs or being bounced in the 1st round. Sure, Bosh joined but he was a top 20 player with no success previously. Hell, Bosh was injured almost an entire playoff run and they still made the finals (and LeBron routinely led the Heat in Pts/Ast/Rebs/Stls in their championship runs). The Cavs' second best player was Mo Williams, and instantly went to a 20 win team when LeBron left.
GSW are the 2-time defending WC Champs, 1 minute away from going back to back, have 3 top 15 players on the roster including the back-to-back MVP, and where the title favorites (according to Vegas) for this season even before Durant signed (OKC had 7/1 odds, third). It's essentially the biggest front-running move in NBA history. Him trying to say he's taking a hard road or saying he wouldn't have signed if GSW shows his insecurities with accepting he's a front-runner.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
resistanze
Eh, I don't see too many similarities with what LeBron did, unless you just mean Durant made a move as a free agent (which applies to everyone).
LeBron went to a Heat team that was either outside of the playoffs or being bounced in the 1st round. Sure, Bosh joined but he was a top 20 player with no success previously. Hell, Bosh was injured almost an entire playoff run and they still made the finals (and LeBron routinely led the Heat in Pts/Ast/Rebs/Stls in their championship runs). The Cavs' second best player was Mo Williams, and instantly went to a 20 win team when LeBron left.
GSW are the 2-time defending WC Champs, 1 minute away from going back to back, have 3 top 15 players on the roster including the back-to-back MVP, and where the title favorites (according to Vegas) for this season even before Durant signed (OKC had 7/1 odds, third). It's essentially the biggest front-running move in NBA history. Him trying to say he's taking a hard road or saying he wouldn't have signed if GSW shows his insecurities with accepting he's a front-runner.
I think you make very valid on why Durant's move is worst (except for people who don't mind, or player fans), but it's still the same concept to me.
Lebron just didn't have the same level of certainty, and his team up was more modest, so to speak.
Let's say, hypothetically, that Durant, Curry, Dray and Thompson decided to all leave their teams and sign Philly, along with a couple of nice ring chasers that are willing to sign for cheap. Is it that big of a difference? Miami were not contenders, but it's not like he signed with the exact same roster they had before.
In any case, it's the same point to me. Old concepts of competition and meaning of championships don't have the same value to these guys as they had to old timers of the NBA. A ring is a ring.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Don't say wassup to that bitch ass
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chinook
He was with his GF who was giving birth to his kid, I think.
She was actually giving birth to Tony's son.:wakeup
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
resistanze
1 minute away from going back to back
We were even closer than that.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
It was OKC or GS. Everything else is bullshit.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurious
We were even closer than that.
:lol
Still, I consider GSW to be closer to going B2B as they had already one in the bag. The effects of 6 had direct impact on the 2014 beat down, imo
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RD2191
It was OKC or GS. Everything else is bullshit.
This
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
I. Hustle
Don't say wassup to that bitch ass
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
elemento
It's BS. He only says that because he knows how much respect the entire league has for the Spurs and Popovich. He hates Leonard and everyone knows it.
One person gets it.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NameLess Scrub
Apparently, Spurs are like that great girl that's good for you, but it's kinda boring so you never pick her, then tell your friends you should have.
Like a Betty to the Warriors' Veronica?
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
KD coming in would hinder Kawhi's growth tbh
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RD2191
It was OKC or GS. Everything else is bullshit.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Snaq O'Meal
Like a Betty to the Warriors' Veronica?
Had to look it up. Apparently yes :lol
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NameLess Scrub
I think you make very valid on why Durant's move is worst (except for people who don't mind, or player fans), but it's still the same concept to me.
Lebron just didn't have the same level of certainty, and his team up was more modest, so to speak.
Let's say, hypothetically, that Durant, Curry, Dray and Thompson decided to all leave their teams and sign Philly, along with a couple of nice ring chasers that are willing to sign for cheap. Is it that big of a difference? Miami were not contenders, but it's not like he signed with the exact same roster they had before.
In any case, it's the same point to me. Old concepts of competition and meaning of championships don't have the same value to these guys as they had to old timers of the NBA. A ring is a ring.
I guess in theory it's the same thing. But for me we already know that core has won a historical amount of games and a title , so they're not an unknown. Maybe LeBron had the same initial fear - ironically he ended up carried his teams even after leaving to the Heat.
Honestly, part of your points about rings is the fault of these retired players and sports media, imo. You have Robert Horry and Kenny Johnson punking Hall of Hamers because they don't have rings. The 'Gotta win a ring!' culture affects sensitive folk like Durant particularly, and he'd rather win one the easiest way possible than to have a chance to retire without one and be criticized (even though he's avoided criticism his entire career).
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mudyez
Of course we were...
Here is the full list in order:
Dubs
Spurs
Cavs
Thunder
Clippers
...this lazy motherfucker just printed out the overall 15/16 standings, as he wanted to get the easiest ring possible.
Durbeta really is a complete pussy. If he had any pride or desire to lead a team, the Thunder and Clippers would have been at the top of his list, not the bottom.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
resistanze
I guess in theory it's the same thing. But for me we already know that core has won a historical amount of games and a title , so they're not an unknown. Maybe LeBron had the same initial fear - ironically he ended up carried his teams even after leaving to the Heat.
Honestly, part of your points about rings is the fault of these retired players and sports media, imo. You have Robert Horry and Kenny Johnson punking Hall of Hamers because they don't have rings. The 'Gotta win a ring!' culture affects sensitive folk like Durant particularly, and he'd rather win one the easiest way possible than to have a chance to retire without one and be criticized (even though he's avoided criticism his entire career).
Fair points.
-
Re: Spurs were #2 behind the Warriors on KD's list
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Clipper Nation
Durbeta really is a complete pussy. If he had any pride or desire to lead a team, the Thunder and Clippers would have been at the top of his list, not the bottom.
Well, at least the Clippers have been choking out of the playoffs for years and had an actual need at his position.
OKC of course needed him, though I understand not wanting to play with Westbrook.