Or do Kawhi and LMA look better without Parker? Sure, TP played well but it didn't translate into a win.
Printable View
Or do Kawhi and LMA look better without Parker? Sure, TP played well but it didn't translate into a win.
No, LMA doesn't look good with or without Parker.
aldridge played bad tonight
Cancerrique. :wowQuote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
Kawhi looks more aggresive without Parker on the court.
That's a fact.
Parker is an alpha. :hatQuote:
Originally Posted by YGWHI
the whole team does.
No. He's just an old point guard who is desperate for attention, aging badly, and hurting the team on both ends.Quote:
Originally Posted by Play Boban
LMA has been shit since that hot streak around the new year
Nice try.Quote:
Originally Posted by YGWHI
ISQuote:
Originally Posted by will_spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan89
You're an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by YGWHI
GWHQuote:
Originally Posted by YGWHI
Is it just me or some here still trying to put the blame on a dude who played 23 mn scoring 16 at 8/12 with 4 assists for a loss ?
:lmao
Judging by how stretches of our offense in the third and fourth quarter, including when the Spurs fell significantly behind, it seemed that the only shot the offense could get was a long two from Patty Mills, I would argue that they needed more Parker, not less.
parker putting himself first last night. he can do that off the bench, not when starting with kawhi & lma.
Thank god for Porker, tbh :lol
So if Parker goes 15/15 with 13 assists and he rest of the team plays bad and we lose, let's blame Parker. Got it.
Parker: 8/12 and 4 ast
Mills: 3/10 and 2 ast
Let's blame Parker
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SASdynasty!
because parker went 15/15 and had 13 assists last night?
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by gambit1990
True that, I didn't watch the game but it looked a lot more Patty's fault than Parker's. Neither Aldridge or Kawhi had an impressive line though. Disappointed that Pop already pulled Murray out of the rotation completely. Kyle Anderson should only be getting trash minutes or playing when Kawhi is out or Simmons is hurt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazil
So you didn't watch but here you are talking about it. :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by 8FOR!3
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
I'm not saying tp had a bad game. I'm saying his good game didn't translate into a win last night. There are plenty of players who put up great stats that don't translate into wins.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazil
Parker wasn't out there at the end of the game
Great thread
He was having a great game yet pop benched him. Hmmm. Wonder why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Pop sees the big picture. You can't, which is why you're a shmuck on a board making a stupid thread and not a 5 time champ coachQuote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
Lol. Exactly, fuck face. He was seeing that tp wasn't actually doing anything to help the team win. No wonder your wife cheated on you for years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Lol no, he was putting Patty in crunch time for Patty sake.Quote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
I like how you get frustrated so easily tho
I don't know if you watched that game, but Patty was awful again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazil
Dabom and crew are deflecting. I don't know why they want more shots for Lamarcus, who had a bad game too.
"Well that escalated quickly".gif :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
Who here said LMA needed more shots? People are specifically saying kawhi did.Quote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
So Pop put MVPatty for his feelings? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
He mentioned he was developing young players... I would have rather he were developing MurrayQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Patty's sake? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Crew. LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
Blake is getting cucked all over this thread. :lmao
Patty is as developed as he'll ever be. He's played in some big games in his career. So I'm not sure what Blake means by Patty's "sake".Quote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
He has always been a backup, not a starter, and the 6th man was Manu. If they are promoting him in the future... that is development for him to close games etc. Despite him being older (not some youngster), Spurs could conceivably contemplate increasing his role and moments like that are development.Quote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
Ugh no. Patty has also started plenty of games in his career. As I said, he's as developed as he'll ever be. He's closed games out before which is way more pressure than starting. Blake just needs to take the L.Quote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
OkQuote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
I am getting out of this bc I don't care about your feud with Blake.:toast
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SAGirl
Lol you're too stupid to discuss further.Quote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
Take your imaginary win and make t shirt.
I analyzed the stat line. Didn't say that was the end all be all but it matters some. Parker's was clearly better than Patty's. Aldridge and Kawhi had a similar stat sheet like they did in their last loss which I did watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabom
Looking at stat lines. :lmao
:lmao
Worst use of lol emoticon I've seen in a whileQuote:
Originally Posted by dabom
You guys are retarded
Who used the cuck hotline? :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
The real question should be...
Is it just me? Or are end of game calls always going to favor the other team...?
Cavs: LeBron calls timeout - doesn't have possession - timeout awarded anyways.
Mavs: Carlisle calls timeout - Curry doesn't have possession - timeout awarded anyways.
I was more talking about posts below your OP tbh... yeah he did not translate but not really his faultQuote:
Originally Posted by RD2191
You know the refs will get it right when the Spurs call a timeout without possession.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenomanul
I could've sworn they also let 4 seconds run off the clock when we were intentionally fouling the guy with the ball, until Manu came in and made the foul obvious...Quote:
Originally Posted by cd98