Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

“Cohen implicated Trump” is all the prosecutor was after.

---

Sooooooooooo deep state.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

on the eve of an election? :lol

---

Dodge #1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

:lol

---

Dodge #1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Dodge #1

---

On the eve of an election, no.

No is my answer, TSA.

The timing shits on your family man conspiracy theory.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

“Cohen implicated Trump” is all the prosecutor was after. They know a campaign finance charge will never hold up in court against Trump. Nothing will come of this concerning Trump.

---

No, it directly implicates Trump. During the election, chicken fucker, with multiple felonies.

That is some weapons grade delusional bullshit you got there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

“Cohen implicated Trump” is all the prosecutor was after. They know a campaign finance charge will never hold up in court against Trump. Nothing will come of this concerning Trump.

---

God bless you, a TRUE AMERICAN.
THANK YOU for your commitment to the messaging!
#MAGA #DrainTheSwamp #LockHerUp #SpiritCooking #Pizzagate
@ realdonaldtrump @ infowars @ prisonplanet @ tuckercarlson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol solely that reason

Are there no other reasons you can think of that a husband and father would have for not wanting an affair exposed publicly?

---

If Trump has other reasons he can explain them in an interview with Robert Khuzami.

Pretty simple.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol solely that reason

Are there no other reasons you can think of that a husband and father would have for not wanting an affair exposed publicly?

---

Sure.

Problem is that they were made right before the election and per the plea BECAUSE of the election.

Do you have some evidence to support some other thesis?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Not a Russian Bot

God bless you, a TRUE AMERICAN.
THANK YOU for your commitment to the messaging!
#MAGA #DrainTheSwamp #LockHerUp #SpiritCooking #Pizzagate
@ realdonaldtrump @ infowars @ prisonplanet @ tuckercarlson

---

ROFL...

masterful. Props. :tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

No, it directly implicates Trump. During the election, chicken fucker, with multiple felonies.

That is some weapons grade delusional bullshit you got there.

---

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

---

https://assets.rbl.ms/18330388/980x.jpg

It was a thing of value, chicken fucker. That is the way the law works. Sorry, you fail so hard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Avenatti

The developments of today will permit us to have the stay lifted in the civil case & should also permit us to proceed with an expedited deposition of Trump under oath about what he knew, when he knew it, and what he did about it. We will disclose it all to the public.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

---

Crime isn't crime.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

---

Quote:

---

However, under federal campaign finance rules, a contribution is “anything of value given, loaned or advanced to influence a federal election.”

A “knowing and willful” violation of those rules — which Cohen admitted to — can lead to criminal charges.

Excessive in-kind contributions do not usually result in criminal prosecution, said Jonathan Biran, a partner at Biran Kelly and former prosecutor with the Justice Department’s public integrity unit.

“What sets this apart is the amount of the things of value — and also, one might argue, the importance of the issue that was the subject of these payments,” he said. “In other words, to prevent the surfacing of these allegations.”

---

Oh fucker of chickens, it matters fuckall whether campaign funds were used or not.

Do you want the law? I can lay that smackdown on your dumb ass too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You’re blinded by your hatred of Trump. Wasn’t a campaign expenditure. Campaign money wasn’t used. Cohen didn’t even commit a crime by making the payment.

---

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30116

Quote:

---

(i) expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, his authorized political committees, or their agents, shall be considered to be a contribution to such candidate;

---

Yes or no, chicken fucker, was this an "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate"

chicken fucker — so edgy

i get it now.

the "s" is for spineless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

chicken fucker — so edgy

---

Why do you support Trump, Darrin?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

Who also happens to be a GOPer. Nice and balance.

---

Who also happened to be opposed by Republicans and nominated for his position by Bill Clinton.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30116


Yes or no, chicken fucker, was this an "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate"

---

Do you think you are more knowledgeable on this subject than the FEC chairman yes or no?

Bradley Smith was notoriously anti campaign finance laws... so i'm not surprised that he's pretty laxed with how he thinks they should be implemented/tried

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

Bradley Smith was notoriously anti campaign finance laws... so i'm not surprised that he's pretty laxed with how he thinks they should be implemented/tried

---

" He is best known for his writing and activities opposing campaign finance regulation."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradle...law_professor)

... and being a Repug, he's corrupt behind his academic credentials. He's for any money corrupting all politics, because he knows the right-wing oligarchy will outbid the non-oligarchy to corrupt legislatures and judges.

Read this today:

The Golden Rule: He Who Has The Gold, Makes the Rules.

... is how the oligarchy is destroying America.

LOL TSA

:lmao remember remember the 28th of Augustember Stealth Jeff