Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reck

:lol thinking I read or take Chuck Ross tweets seriously. I scrolled right past them but I entertained that tweet for the purpose of clarity and lo and behold, there was no link to the actual claim that said former FBI said what he said.

And the kicker, it was a partisan hack job that took place behind closed doors and not even under oath.

End results are in:



:lol Me having to actually do your research work
:lol Owned by Fox news
:lol Not under oath
:lol Anonymous sources good now
:lol Moffa himself didn't specifically confirmed what your and Maddow's claim is
:lol Didn't even testify to the wild claim

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-warrants.html

:lol Left holding the bag again.

---

From your own article

“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”

“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”

:lol Reck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Fuck dude, he's asking you to clarify your question.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I'm too stupid to realize what a question looks like

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Fuck dude, he's asking you to clarify your question.

---

No. He’s knows the answer. He’s just stalling and trying to take it to the weeds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Dodge #1.

---

yes. it was a nothingburger.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

From your own article

“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”

“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”

:lol Reck

---

And yet I go to my first post about them saying "we just learned new information" but won't show you specifics or even outline the facts in writing.

You still dont know what an unsubstantiated claim is vs what a fact is.

I mean, the FBI guy in question himself didn't confirmed what Meadow is propping up. It's all in the quotes. :lol Grasping for wins that never come.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

From your own article

“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”

“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”

:lol Reck

---

lol won't be about the dossier

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Whenever they go on Hannity it's a verified nothing burger.

---

This is sure to be a big BOOM for the objective skeptics watching Sean Hannity. You can typically expect to see a massive public opinion shift after Hannity breaks a story.

Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment :rollin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment :rollin

---

Just like #pizzagate fell apart for you?

Silsby?

Uranium One?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Just like #pizzagate fell apart for you?

Silsby?

Uranium One?

---

Seth Rich as Guccifer

Susan Rice indictment

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Seth Rich as Guccifer

Susan Rice indictment

---

Yep.

Will it be that bad, TSA?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment :rollin

---

You've said this before. Then you carefully cultivate your news bubble so you feel validated, conveniently forgetting each of your prior predictions and theories, while the rest of the world moves forward with reality.

Whatever gets you off. It's well past the point of pathetic, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Just like #pizzagate fell apart for you?

Silsby?

Uranium One?

---

:lol poor Pavlov forced to go straight to whataboutism :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Seth Rich as Guccifer

Susan Rice indictment

---

TSA has been shit on so much on this board throughout the years that he thinks the golden glow on his skin is gold.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol poor Pavlov forced to go straight to whataboutism :lol

---

That's what you did since this thread started :lmao

My theory stands unchanged.

How many of your theories have come and gone in the past year and a half, TSA?

Serious question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

That's what you did since this thread started :lmao

My theory stands unchanged.

How many of your theories have come and gone in the past year and a half, TSA?

Serious question.

---

I don’t keep notes on what theories I throw out Pav.

You pushed muh Russia and are now trying to distance yourself as fast as you can. It’s understandable but a chickenshit move. djohn is at least going down with the sinking ship with pride.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I don’t keep notes on what theories I throw out Pav.

You pushed muh Russia and are now trying to distance yourself as fast as you can. It’s understandable but a chickenshit move. djohn is at least going down with the sinking ship with pride.

---

My theory remains as it always has from the start.

You got amnesia about all your failed theories. So many....

You're ashamed.

lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I don’t keep notes on what theories I throw out Pav.

You pushed muh Russia and are now trying to distance yourself as fast as you can. It’s understandable but a chickenshit move. djohn is at least going down with the sinking ship with pride.

---

The only sinking ship around here is Trumps presidency and I surely hope you are around when we all make fun of you at the end if it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I don’t keep notes on what theories I throw out Pav.

---

You say this like it's something to be proud of. All it means is you have no conviction and you're content to push out whatever bullshit the liars you idolize tell you to push out, without caring if they're true or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurminator

You say this like it's something to be proud of. All it means is you have no conviction and you're content to push out whatever bullshit the liars you idolize tell you to push out, without caring if they're true or not.

---

coming from someone who’s pushed the muh Russia for two years :lol

TSA's only defense for his shitty record is he hasn't kept track of how shitty his record is. :rollin

:lol muh Russia crew coping mechanisms

:lol muh Russia crew pretending this thread never happened

Of course this thread happened.

Flynn is still cooperating.

lol TSA projecting hard -- conveniently forgot all his previous theories that went to shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol muh Russia crew pretending this thread never happened

---

Flynn plead guilty to a felony

:lol muh judge sullivan
:lol muh exculpatory evidence
:lol muh plea withdrawal