Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

any comment on Russian funds being funneled to the Trump campaign?

---

any comment on how you think this sends Trump to prison?

djohn2oo8. I’m waiting.

djohn2oo8

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Yes.

:lol FARA violations

Also.

“The charges against Patten were filed by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington rather than by Mueller. Mueller’s team likewise referred an investigation into Ukraine political work by other Manafort associates, lobbyist Tony Podesta and Vin Weber, to prosecutors in New York.”

---

Patten has agreed to cooperate with Mueller.

:lmao TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

any comment on how you think this sends Trump to prison?

---

Trump inaugural committee breaking federal law in accepting foreign donations. And how’s there’s a direct tie to Russian money there. Guess you can’t claim “no ties to Russia” :lmao

lol psa

Cats got his tongue

Still waiting on this one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

What are you saying will happen, TSA?

Call your shot.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Still waiting on this one.

---

response: Trump knows EVERYTHING and has the whole time. He's just teasing the swamp.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

djohn2oo8. I’m waiting.

---

You've been ignoring my question for pages, chickenshit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Trump inaugural committee breaking federal law in accepting foreign donations. And how’s there’s a direct tie to Russian money there. Guess you can’t claim “no ties to Russia” :lmao

---

How did the Trump inaugural committee break the law djohn? Do you not know what a straw buyer is?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You do realize Trump has known about the failed attempt to frame him with Russian collusion since he’s been in office don’t you? He’s had access to all the 302’s, access to all the texts, all the testimony, access to everything. Each new tweet is just making the general public aware of the incoming shitstorm that is about to be revealed. Trump is just toying with the conspirators now. ...[tweet omitted for brevity-RG]

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

I mean seriously... who at the white house is reading all of this? Be specific as possible.
Flesh out your fantasy here.

---

[TSA answers Pavlov instead]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

The "moon hoax" breaks down because of the number of people required to be quiet about it.
Tell me who EXACTLY is reading all of the material?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Who is reading the material? He’s the fucking President of the United States dipshit. He has the entire intelligence apparatus, military intelligence, and a trove of AG’s/prosecutors behind him. Trump has known everything the entire time. It’s really not hard to understand this.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

That is a lot of people, and not really at all specific. But it gives us a place to start.

So the President is reading ALL of this? Or just summaries? When exactly is he keeping up on the millions of documents being seized and dozens of witnesses being interviewed?

Accounts both before, and after he became president paint a picture of someone who barely reads bullet points.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...sident/549794/

What is your best evidence that the President actually reads complex materials?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

[tweet about how bad Hillary Clinton is]

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Hmm that doesn't seem to be an answer to any of my reasonable questions about what you are trying to assert is true. We have constant indications of a thinly staffed, overwhelmed administration.
Most recently:
White House faces brain drain at perilous moment
https://www.apnews.com/b780699b037640dda5b39f687f6a5fc7

Again, just so it doesn't get lost:

What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

[talks to someone else, ignores question again]

---

What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

You've been ignoring my question for pages, chickenshit.

---

It’s a stupid fucking question and has no relevance to Trump’s access to everything.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

How did the Trump inaugural committee break the law djohn? Do you not know what a straw buyer is?

---

i know exactly what it is. It is you who needs to look up the definition
:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

How did the Trump inaugural committee break the law djohn? Do you not know what a straw buyer is?

---

You think the real buyer didn't want anyone on team Trump to know he was actually giving the money?

He just wanted to make the straw buyer look fancy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You do realize Trump has known about the failed attempt to frame him with Russian collusion since he’s been in office don’t you? He’s had access to all the 302’s, access to all the texts, all the testimony, access to everything. Each new tweet is just making the general public aware of the incoming shitstorm that is about to be revealed. Trump is just toying with the conspirators now. ...[tweet omitted for brevity-RG]

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

I mean seriously... who at the white house is reading all of this? Be specific as possible.
Flesh out your fantasy here.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

[ answers Pavlov instead]

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

The "moon hoax" breaks down because of the number of people required to be quiet about it.
Tell me who EXACTLY is reading all of the material?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Who is reading the material? He’s the fucking President of the United States dipshit. He has the entire intelligence apparatus, military intelligence, and a trove of AG’s/prosecutors behind him. Trump has known everything the entire time. It’s really not hard to understand this.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

That is a lot of people, and not really at all specific. But it gives us a place to start.

So the President is reading ALL of this? Or just summaries? When exactly is he keeping up on the millions of documents being seized and dozens of witnesses being interviewed?

Accounts both before, and after he became president paint a picture of someone who barely reads bullet points.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...sident/549794/

What is your best evidence that the President actually reads complex materials?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

[tweet about how bad Hillary Clinton is]

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Hmm that doesn't seem to be an answer to any of my reasonable questions about what you are trying to assert is true. We have constant indications of a thinly staffed, overwhelmed administration.
Most recently:
White House faces brain drain at perilous moment
https://www.apnews.com/b780699b037640dda5b39f687f6a5fc7

Again, just so it doesn't get lost:

What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

[talks to someone else, ignores question again

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

It’s a stupid fucking question and has no relevance to Trump’s access to everything.

---

It isn't a stupid question. It is requiring you to prove one of the primary grounding assumptions of your entire argument.

If you know your argument is bullshit, I can see why you might not want to try and prove it.

Sophist.

Prove your assertion that "Trump knows everything" by showing that the underlying assumption, i.e. he actually can read and understand everything going on in a complex, multi-threaded, multi-tiered investigation, is a reasonable one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Still waiting on this one.

---

Already answered. I’m just going to sit back and enjoy the show.

Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

• Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;
• Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party(including donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
• Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
• Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.

Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to an FEC enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or both.


:lmao TSA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

i know exactly what it is. It is you who needs to look up the definition
:lmao

---

Then you should have no problem exposing how the Trump inaugural committee broke the law. So?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Already answered. I’m just going to sit back and enjoy the show.

---

Until you make another unprompted prediction that will bite you in the ass again.

:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

• Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;
• Making any contribution or donation to any committee or organization of any national, state, district, or local political party(including donations to a party nonfederal account or office building account);
• Making any disbursement for an electioneering communication;
• Making any donation to a presidential inaugural committee.

Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to an FEC enforcement action, criminal prosecution, or both.


:lmao TSA

---

I didn’t ask you how Patten broke the law. I asked you how the inaugural committee broke the law.

You look especially stupid when you burn yourself and add an emoticon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I didn’t ask you how Patten broke the law. I asked you how the inaugural committee broke the law.

You look especially stupid when you burn yourself and add an emoticon.

---

They accepted the money you stupid fucker :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I didn’t ask you how Patten broke the law. I asked you how the inaugural committee broke the law.

You look especially stupid when you burn yourself and add an emoticon.

---

... or when you have to add "wrong about pizzagate" to your profile. :rollin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

It isn't a stupid question. It is requiring you to prove one of the primary grounding assumptions of your entire argument.

If you know your argument is bullshit, I can see why you might not want to try and prove it.

Sophist.

Prove your assertion that "Trump knows everything" by showing that the underlying assumption, i.e. he actually can read and understand everything going on in a complex, multi-threaded, multi-tiered investigation, is a reasonable one.

---

Yes it was a stupid question based on false premise. I said Trump has “access to everything”. Anything he wants to know is given to him simply by requesting it from the agency he wants it from; FBI, CIA, NSA etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Yes it was a stupid question based on false premise. I said Trump has “access to everything”. Anything he wants to know is given to him simply by requesting it from the agency he wants it from; FBI, CIA, NSA etc.

---

So he hasn't actually requested any of this?

:lol TSA keeping it vague