Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

You have a 200 fucking page thread and have claimed at least 20 people would be indicted and charged by now. Add that to all your orlther wild claims and you're batting a solid .025
Yeah you keep doing you and you keep being right you delusional fuck :rollin

---

It’s up to about 32 people indicted isn’t it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Im not trying to play gotcha because of the word tense you moron :lol


Hillary will be indicted
I think Hillary will be indicted

---

Neither happened in any case

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Hillary's crimes were out in public arena for anyone to see.

---

What were her crimes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

7 months, 386 pages, 0 indictments

It's over

:lmao

---

I missed this gem too

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

I missed this gem too

---

lololololol!!!!!!!


Yet, he has the nerve to show up here and claim a win and then of course

"muh bets"

:lol:lol:lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs Homer

lololololol!!!!!!!


Yet, he has the nerve to show up here and claim a win and then of course

"muh bets"

:lol:lol:lol

---

And I know he doesn’t want me to pull up the post where I talked him into a money bet because he only wanted to bet accounts on spurstalk :lol

Lost in all this is the fact that Trump - at the G20 - approached Putin in secret to lick his boots again.

I knew when he said he was canceling that he would try to suck up to his Handler in secrecy.

He did.

How did we find out?





RUSSIA REPORTED IT.


When you have the US President compromised - you can embarrass him anytime just for fun!


https://investigaterussia.org/media/...proached-putin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Look at it this way and what’s public:

Team Trump offered Putin a Penthouse in the proposed Trump Tower Moscow
Team Trump met with Russians in Trump Tower for dirt on Hillary
Team Trump coordinated with Wikileaks on the timing of the release of those emails
Team Trump MET with Julian Assange prior to the release of those emails
Flynn talked with Russians about the sanctions and was caught lying about it

Those are things that are public. And yeah a shitload of things still under seal. It would seem when Flynn was caught lying about having discussions with Kisylak about those sanctions, he would tell who ordered him to have those conversations. So when you say things not supported by what we know now, that’s bullshit.

---

Spurs Homer says Flynn spilled the beans about a quid pro quo.

As likely as that may be, don't know that from the Flynn information just released by Mueller.

Funniest thing about TSA. He claims that Mueller isn’t building a case on conspiracy or collusion. This same fool who claims to know what Mueller is doing claimed Horowitz was going to charge Comey

https://media.giphy.com/media/3Kz2JgzhJRB2E/giphy.gif

Look y'all.

I think DJT is crooked as hell and has way too many conflicts of interest to be the President, but that does not mean I'm going to agree with the smug certainty put forward of posters attending the Twitter School of Law, about the legal consequences for DJT.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Look y'all.

I think DJT is crooked as hell and has too many conflicts of interest to also be the President, but that does not mean I'm going to agree with the smug certainty about the legal conclusions for DJT put forward by posters from the Twitter School of Law.

---

Well good thing Mueller doesn’t care if you agree or not.

Mueller isn't going to do shit to DJT because he follows the rules. DOJ rules say the president can't be indicted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs Homer

What would you call someone who takes the side of the people who conspired with an enemy government to attack our elections and defend Russia in his words and actions?

What do you call people who have seen public info confirming that Trump sold out the USA to Russia and still attack other people who call him out on it?

What do you call people who, no matter what tons of evidence have been spoon-fed to them - continue to give the traitor in chief the benefit of the doubt because "all the evidence is not in" even after tons of incriminating evidence (much of it done by the traitor himself in public) has been presented.

I would say that in this case it is high time for people to decide if they care about a cult con man criminal or their own democracy.

---

Greedy, uncaring concerning financial laws, and clueless in his new position’s protocol.

Just like his business practices.
The guy has been in over 3000 lawsuits.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Mueller isn't going to do shit to DJT because he follows the rules. DOJ rules say the president can't be indicted.

---

Incorrect.

well, we'll see about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

well, we'll see about that.

---

Yes we shall. Because Rosenstein said that was an opinion, and shouldn’t be inferenced when regarding today’s matters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djohn2oo8

Yes we shall. Because Rosenstein said that was an opinion, and shouldn’t be inferenced when regarding today’s matters.

---

also

nixons case set the precedent that a prez is not above the law and can be subpoenaed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs Homer

also

nixons case set the precedent that a prez is not above the law and can be subpoenaed

---

... and Slick Willie also subpoenaed and testified before grand jury

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

... and Slick Willie also subpoenaed and testified before grand jury

---

:tu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

... and Slick Willie also subpoenaed and testified before grand jury

---

And Trump could refuse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

And Trump could refuse.

---

And then RapeK will rule he's allowed to refuse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

And Trump could refuse.

---

Can’t refuse a subpoena. Would have to fight it in court.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pgardn

And Trump could refuse.

---

... which would be like Trash taking the 5th.

SCOTUS, in the Clinton case, has ruled that a President could be subpoenaed

"I consider this case all but settled by Clinton v. Jones. In that case,

President Clinton sought to stay a sexual harassment case filed against him until at least the expiration of his term in office.

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Clinton.

The Court found that a sitting president is not entitled to absolute immunity from civil litigation

based on acts that occurred before taking office.

Put another way, the president may only be entitled to immunity from civil litigation under exceptional circumstances."

https://www.vox.com/2018/3/15/169974...p-russia-probe

And Mueller's case against Trash would be for when Trash was colluding with Russia as a private citizen, not so-called President.

...