Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

Russia Is Attacking the U.S. System From Within

A new filing by Special Counsel Robert Mueller shows how Russia uses the federal courts to go after its adversaries.

a Russian troll farm currently locked in a legal battle over its alleged interference in the 2016 election appeared to wage yet another disinformation campaign late last year—this time targeting Mueller himself.

the special counsel’s office turned over 1 million pages of evidence to lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting as part of the discovery process.

But someone connected to Concord allegedly manipulated the documents and leaked them to reporters,

hoping the documents would make people think that Mueller’s evidence against the troll farm and its owners was flimsy.

The tactic didn’t seem to convince anyone,

but it appeared to mark yet another example of

Russia exploiting the U.S. justice system to undercut its rivals abroad.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...courts/581884/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

I never claimed you said the lawyer made it up. Apologize for lying, Pavlov.

---

:lol then why were you talking like I did, TSA?

Explain.

Quote:

---

Weissmann seems unbelievably stupid due to the fact he has been caught multiple times pulling dirty shit.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...dirty_cop.html

In order for CNN to not have been tipped off by the SCO you had to come up with a laughable conspiracy theory of someone changing the metadata.

---

Do you think people connected with or supporters of Roger Stone are above altering metadata to discredit Mueller?

There was rampant speculation Stone would be indicted because the grand jury had been reconvened. Including from Stone himself.

Quote:

---

The SCO tipping off CNN would accomplish the early morning raid and perp walk of Roger Stone being caught on camera.

---

Which accomplishes what?

Explain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

:lol Schiff

---

Why would you and Trump want the report to be secret?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjUvfZj-Fm0

Darrin Googled that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Darrin Googled that.

---

Muh sauces

Quote:

---

on how someone could have obtained sealed grand jury indictments.

---

Wouldn't surprise me if it was Matt Whitaker tbh...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Muh sauces

---

you go out of your way to find this shit, tbh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

you go out of your way to find this shit, tbh

---

I've posted that same video at least three times already. :lol

TSA concerned with how Stone was arrested when weeks ago he laughed off the idea of Stone being arrested :lol

Comrade TSA -

90

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

I've posted that same video at least three times already. :lol

---

Point remains

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

:lol then why were you talking like I did, TSA?

Explain.

---

I wasn't

Quote:

---

Do you think people connected with or supporters of Roger Stone are above altering metadata to discredit Mueller?

There was rampant speculation Stone would be indicted because the grand jury had been reconvened. Including from Stone himself.

---

No I don't think they above that but your scenario where they would makes no sense. The document was sent from CNN to Stone's lawyer. Stone's lawyer sent to the judiciary. Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?

Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no

Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?

How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?

Quote:

---

Which accomplishes what?

Explain.

---

A sensational muh Russia news story to smear Trump by association even though the indictment had nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion.

So your theory makes no sense at all.

What was the first document on the DOJ site? Was it the same as the draft? The lawyer's wording is terrible there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

So your theory makes no sense at all.

What was the first document on the DOJ site? Was it the same as the draft? The lawyer's wording is terrible there.

---

Sorry, multiple questions pending.

Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?

Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no

Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?

How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Sorry, multiple questions pending.

Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?

Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no

Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?

How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?

---

Who gives a shit.
A traitor to this country - got arrested in a "by the book" arrest.

Who gives a fuck that is not a russian traitor?

Just you dumbshit traitorous piece of shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Sorry, multiple questions pending.

Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?

---

Dunno. Probably wasn't altered. Sounds like the draft was on the website from the lawyer's messy narrative.

Quote:

---

Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no

---

Since that's a matter of opinion, no.

Quote:

---

Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?

---

I see no point to it tbh, especially since those on the right are whining about the FBI's tactics like little bitches.

Quote:

---

How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?

---

Goes back to my question about the first document on the DOJ site.

Maybe you can take a crack at it.

I don't think you will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Dunno. Probably wasn't altered. Sounds like the draft was on the website from the lawyer's messy narrative.

Since that's a matter of opinion, no.

I see no point to it tbh, especially since those on the right are whining about the FBI's tactics like little bitches.

Goes back to my question about the first document on the DOJ site.

Maybe you can take a crack at it.

I don't think you will.

---

There was no Pacer heading on the document. It wasn't from the website. How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

There was no Pacer heading on the document. It wasn't from the website.

---

What was the first document from the website?

Why does he go on about the first document from the website?

Are you going to take a crack at that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlov

What was the first document from the website?

Why does he go on about the first document from the website?

Are you going to take a crack at that?

---

Irrelevant. First and second on PACER had PACER header.

Who would have access to a draft copy of the indictment before it was filed under seal? How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment without a PACER header before it was filed under seal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Irrelevant. First and second on PACER had PACER header.

---

Where does it say the first had a PACER header?

And again, why would Weissmann have to send an entire document to CNN with his name on it? Dude could just call someone to tip them off. If it's his draft, it's more likely it isn't him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TSA

Irrelevant. First and second on PACER had PACER header.

Who would have access to a draft copy of the indictment before it was filed under seal? How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment without a PACER header before it was filed under seal?

---

this is just wrong. wayback machine to the rescue

https://web.archive.org/web/20190125...ustice.gov/sco

this is from january 25. you can click the indictment that was posted there. no pacer heading.

then you flip forward one day to january 26 (or i'll just directly link here... https://web.archive.org/web/20190126...ustice.gov/sco )

and you click the indictment again and there is a pacer heading

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spurraider21

this is just wrong. wayback machine to the rescue

https://web.archive.org/web/20190125...ustice.gov/sco

this is from january 25. you can click the indictment that was posted there. no pacer heading.

then you flip forward one day to january 26 (or i'll just directly link here... https://web.archive.org/web/20190126...ustice.gov/sco )

and you click the indictment again and there is a pacer heading

---

You're missing the point. How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment with metadata showing it was created and modified a full day before the indictment was filed under seal?

Lol wrong again