-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Perfect time to pivot from Russia
what has this guy ever been right about?
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Robert Mueller's lead prosecutor drops hint suggesting Russian collusion is still very much on the menu
"one of the most tantalizing" hints that Special Counsel Robert
Mueller "is still pursuing the central question of whether there was some kind of deal between Russia and the Trump campaign"
during the 2016 presidential election, The New York Times reported Sunday night.
The theory that
Trump campaign officials were in talks to effectively cede Eastern Ukraine to Russia and
maybe ease Russian sanctions
while Russia was helping the Trump campaign
"This goes to the larger view of what we think is going on, and what we think is the motive here,"
Mr. Weissmann said.
"This goes, I think, very much to the heart of what the special counsel's office is investigating." ...
https://theweek.com/speedreads/82307...till-much-menu
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/10/u...a-inquiry.html
Pootin helps Trash win, then Trash lifts sanctions AND bullies NATO into inaction while Pootin invades, occupies, reclaims Ukraine for Mother Russia
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Perfect time to pivot from Russia
Investigators follow the breadcrumbs wherever they go, surely you've watched police procedurals before.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
"John F. Solomon is an American media executive and columnist.
He is currently vice president of digital video and an opinion contributor for The Hill.[1]
He is known primarily for his tenure as an executive and editor-in-chief
at The Washington Times. :lol
He has been accused of
biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and
of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Solomon
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Uh oh Schiff already starting to question Mueller. Not a good sign for the boards Russia hoax pushers :lol
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Uh oh Schiff already starting to question Mueller. Not a good sign for the boards Russia hoax pushers :lol
Schiff isn't questioning Mueller's efforts, he just thinks Mueller could go further. Mueller's team has plenty of other Trash+mafiya criminalities to nail down.
How does Schiff actually know how far Mueller has gone into Trash's finances?
Then there's SDNY also drilling into Trash's finances.
"not a good sign for the board's " Trash fellators.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Uh oh Schiff already starting to question Mueller. Not a good sign for the boards Russia hoax pushers :lol
:lol why is that not a good sign?
Explain.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Its always a good sign to expose
MORE
treasonous fuckery!
rofl
comrade TSA
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
You've gotta stop falling for the same four or five guys, dude.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
lol we've already been over the fisa title i stuff over and over and over again...
here's the first one i found after a simple search
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...=1#post9280296
and lol going back to the woods procedure well. TSA just recycling old stories per par...
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
:lol no shit. One week it's the grocer, another week it's the high school coach.
Now it's the CPA.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Robert Mueller’s secret weapon has Trump’s team scared
https://www.newsmax.com/CMSPages/Get...teName=Newsmax
Federal Prosecutor on Special Counsel Mueller’s team,Andrew Weissmann, has several of Trump’s legal team worried because of his “hardball” tactics.
Melber explained that he is known for being “effective” and “controversial.”
Melber said that unlike most prosecutors, Weissmann is not afraid to go after family members.
Sean Hannity calling Weissmann “a legal nightmare.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/rob...e+Raw+Story%29
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
spurraider21
lol we've already been over the fisa title i stuff over and over and over again...
here's the first one i found after a simple search
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...=1#post9280296
and lol going back to the woods procedure well. TSA just recycling old stories per par...
That link is from a year ago. Baker and Anderson's testimony is not an old recycled story as they hadn't even testified at the time of the link you posted.
New info
"Anderson told investigators that her direct supervisor, FBI General Counsel Baker, had personally read and reviewed the Page FISA, lending her additional confidence in the review process. However, according to Baker, he had only read the “factual section” relating to probable cause, and had not read or reviewed any other section of the Page FISA, including the Woods file.
The Woods file, which provides facts supporting the allegations made in the FISA application, is attached to every FISA application and is provided by the originating FBI agent in each case.
Baker, during questioning as to why the FBI failed to disclose the political motivations of dossier author Steele to the FISA court testified this fact should have been vetted during lower levels of preparation."
New info
Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy general counsel for the FBI and head of the bureau’s National Security and Cyber Law Branch, who approved the application for a warrant to spy on Page before it went to FBI Director James Comey. During her Aug. 31 testimony, she described the FISA application process as being a linear path and noted there is a specific “system called FISAMS within the Bureau that tracks in a linear fashion all the approvals on a FISA.”
Yet, despite the rigid description provided by Baker and Anderson, it appears the linearity process was not adhered to in the case of the Page FISA. According to Anderson, pre-approvals for the Page FISA were provided from both Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, before the FISA application was ever presented to her for review.
“[M]y boss and my boss’ boss had already reviewed and approved this application. And, in fact, the Deputy Attorney General, who had the authority to sign the application, to be the substantive approver on the FISA application itself, had approved the application. And that typically would not have been the case before I did that,” said Anderson.
Anderson told investigators that the Page FISA “was handled a little bit differently in that sense, in that it received very high-level review and approvals — informal, oral approvals — before it ever came to me for signature.”
The unusual preliminary review and approval from both McCabe and Yates appears to have had a substantial impact on the normal review process, leading other individuals like Anderson to believe that the Page FISA was more vetted than, perhaps, it really was. It is not known why McCabe and Yates both chose to insert themselves at an early stage into the Page FISA process.
McCabe, who was fired for lying to the DOJ Inspector General, is currently being investigated by a grand jury. Yates, who was fired by President Donald Trump for failing to impose the so-called “travel ban,” was responsible for the issuance of a July 2015 opinion that allowed the DOJ & FBI to refuse Inspector General access to information collected under Title III of the Federal Wiretap Act.
Anderson told investigators that in general, as an approver, she was verifying that processes had been followed and legal sufficiency existed for the FISA, but noted that she did so with “a great degree of deference to the many lawyers who have reviewed that application before me.”
But in the specific case of the Page FISA, Anderson viewed the situation as particularly unique, noting that “I wouldn’t view it as my role to second-guess that substantive approval that had already been given by the Deputy Director and by the Deputy Attorney General in this particular instance.”
Anderson also testified that she had not read the Page FISA prior to signing off on the application and passing it along to FBI Director James Comey for final signature.
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
What's your conspiracy theory here, TSA?
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia
WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...mpaign-n970536
lol
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia
WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...mpaign-n970536
lol
Eventually this committee's findings will be in the same category as the Nunes' committee's findings -
July 27,2016 "russia if you are listening...i hope you find those missing emails"
July 27, 2016 - Russia attacks the clinton campaign email server and steals emails -
Russians: "russia is trying to help trump win and we have damaging info on hrc"
Junior traitor: "i love it"
and then they follow through on this meeting to exchange (quid pro quo) promises/deals/conspire/collude
Since taking office - Trump has consistently done everything he can to avoid sanctioning russia - even after Congress almost unanimously approved the sanctions
In FULL PUBLIC VIEW - these events described above - are conspiracy to defraud -
Add to that the entire PUBLIC VIEW of Trump openly aiding and abetting Russia after they attacked the USA - and the entire planet can see these crimes in FULL PUBLIC VIEW!
Yet - ANOTHER - Republican led committee has decided that we are all blind and deaf and has tried to give Trump a "temporary 24-36 media cycle" win.
Sure. Go ahead and disbelieve your lying eyes :lmao
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs Homer
Eventually this committee's findings will be in the same category as the Nunes' committee's findings -
July 27,2016 "russia if you are listening...i hope you find those missing emails"
July 27, 2016 - Russia attacks the clinton campaign email server and steals emails -
Russians: "russia is trying to help trump win and we have damaging info on hrc"
Junior traitor: "i love it"
and then they follow through on this meeting to exchange (quid pro quo) promises/deals/conspire/collude
Since taking office - Trump has consistently done everything he can to avoid sanctioning russia - even after Congress almost unanimously approved the sanctions
In FULL PUBLIC VIEW - these events described above - are conspiracy to defraud -
Add to that the entire PUBLIC VIEW of Trump openly aiding and abetting Russia after they attacked the USA - and the entire planet can see these crimes in FULL PUBLIC VIEW!
Yet - ANOTHER - Republican led committee has decided that we are all blind and deaf and has tried to give Trump a "temporary 24-36 media cycle" win.
Sure. Go ahead and disbelieve your lying eyes :lmao
WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.
WOMP WOMP
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs Homer
Eventually this committee's findings will be in the same category as the Nunes' committee's findings -
July 27,2016 "russia if you are listening...i hope you find those missing emails"
July 27, 2016 - Russia attacks the clinton campaign email server and steals emails -
Russians: "russia is trying to help trump win and we have damaging info on hrc"
Junior traitor: "i love it"
and then they follow through on this meeting to exchange (quid pro quo) promises/deals/conspire/collude
Since taking office - Trump has consistently done everything he can to avoid sanctioning russia - even after Congress almost unanimously approved the sanctions
In FULL PUBLIC VIEW - these events described above - are conspiracy to defraud -
Add to that the entire PUBLIC VIEW of Trump openly aiding and abetting Russia after they attacked the USA - and the entire planet can see these crimes in FULL PUBLIC VIEW!
Yet - ANOTHER - Republican led committee has decided that we are all blind and deaf and has tried to give Trump a "temporary 24-36 media cycle" win.
Sure. Go ahead and disbelieve your lying eyes :lmao
The emails were stolen and published before July 27 2016 you fucking dipshit
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TSA
The emails were stolen and published before July 27 2016 you fucking dipshit
Here you go Comrade:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...sia-email-hack
The conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton campaign through the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton’s personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted seventy-six email addresses at the domain for the Clinton campaign.
that was what I meant!
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spurs Homer
Here you go Comrade:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...sia-email-hack
The conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton campaign through the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton’s personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted seventy-six email addresses at the domain for the Clinton campaign.
that was what I meant!
You said emails were stolen on July 27 2016, they were not.
The emails were stolen and published before July 27 2016 you fucking dipshit.
March 21 2016 Podesta emails hacked
April 12 2016 DCCC hacked
April 16 2016 DNC hacked
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
-
Re: Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions